Building the future: junior doctors as leaders
2
Citation
2
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Keywords:
Clinical Governance
Editorial board
LIU has subscriptions to Journal Citation Reports and SCOPUS. While JCR's Impact Factor is more widely known, SCOPUS includes more citations making it possible one will find the journal they are searching for indexed in SCOPUS and not in JCR.
Impact factor
Web of science
Cite
Citations (0)
The objective of this article is: a) to identify Peruvian researchers with high, medium and low impact factor according to Web of Science and Scopus databases; b) to identify the bibliometric factor with the highest influence on h-index of Peruvian esearchers; c) to compare h-index between Web of Science and Scopus, at an individual and institutional level. Data were collected from Web of Science and Scopus (189 Peruvian researchers, 28 institutions on Web of Science and 33 on Scopus), between September 1823, 2013. Then, institutional registries were created and linear regression analysis with stepwise procedure was run to identify bibliometric factors with higher influence on the h-index of Peruvian researchers. Web of Science and Scopus showed interesting simmilarities in the h-index of Peruvian academic institutions. At individual level, documents indexed in citation database had the highest influence on the h-index. Regression model identified bibliometric factors with higher influence on the h-index of Peruvian researchers, however further large scale studies are needed to improve external validity.
Web of science
Impact factor
Cite
Citations (16)
This guide is intended mainly for faculty at UNK, but can also be utilized by students for assignments and in their work on research projects. This page will introduce Scopus as a tool in the Scholarly Communications landscape.
Cite
Citations (0)
Citation database
Bibliographic database
Web of science
Sample (material)
Cite
Citations (38)
This study aims to find out the development of the publication of scientific articles about the TPACK (Technological Pedagogic Content Knowledge) Model. The research method used was a literature review using a bibliometric analysis approach that started by searching the TPACK model keywords in the Scopus journal database from 2013 to 2022. The study results revealed that within a period of 10 years, from 2013 to 2022, there were 528 publications of the TPACK model published in Scopus-indexed journals. Meanwhile, the United States is the country that contributes the most to the number of published articles. The Journal of Physics Conference is listed as the journal that has contributed the most to the dissemination of the Scopus-indexed TPACK model articles. To get more comprehensive results, further research is not only limited to Scopus-indexed journals but also includes the integration of the TPACK component in the learning to be studied.
Web of science
Cite
Citations (4)
Since last year (2015) MERCon publications are visible in the SCOPUS database/index. This is a significant achievement because SCOPUS is increasingly being used by many agencies to judge the research performance of both individuals and institutions. Both the THES (Times Higher Education Supplement) and QS (Quacquarelli Symonds) university ranking systems use SCOPUS. For this reason the University of Moratuwa is moving towards treating SCOPUS as a benchmark for quality publications. So MERCon's inclusion in SCOPUS is indeed a big step towards its international credibility; it will also probably attract progressively better quality papers in years to come, including overseas ones.
Cite
Citations (0)
Journal field classifications in Scopus are used for citation-based indicators and by authors choosing appropriate journals to submit to. Whilst prior research has found that Scopus categories are occasionally misleading, it is not known how this varies for different journal types. In response, we assessed whether specialist, cross-field and general academic journals sometimes have publication practices that do not match their Scopus classifications. For this, we compared the Scopus narrow fields of journals with the fields that best fit their articles' titles and abstracts. We also conducted qualitative follow-up to distinguish between Scopus classification errors and misleading journal aims. The results show sharp field differences in the extent to which both cross-field and apparently specialist journals publish articles that match their Scopus narrow fields, and the same for general journals. The results also suggest that a few journals have titles and aims that do not match their contents well, and that some large topics spread themselves across many relevant disciplines. Thus, the likelihood that a journal's Scopus narrow fields reflect its contents varies substantially by field (although without systematic field trends) and some cross-field topics seem to cause difficulties in appropriately classifying relevant journals. These issues undermine citation-based indicators that rely on journal-level classification and may confuse scholars seeking publishing venues.
Publication
Web of science
Citation impact
Cite
Citations (0)
Abstract This study presents and explains the phenomenon of indexjacking , which involves the systematic infiltration of hijacked journals into international indexing databases, with Scopus being one of the most infiltrated among these databases. Through an analysis of known lists of hijacked journals, the study identified at least 67 hijacked journals that have penetrated Scopus since 2013. Of these, 33 journals indexed unauthorized content in Scopus and 23 compromised the homepage link in the journal's profile, while 11 did both. As of September 2023, 41 hijacked journals are still compromising the data of legitimate journals in Scopus. The presence of hijacked journals in Scopus is a challenge for scientific integrity due to the legitimization of unreliable papers that have not undergone peer review and compromises the quality of the Scopus database. The presence of hijacked journals in Scopus has far‐reaching effects. Papers published in these journals may be cited, and unauthorized content from these journals in Scopus is thus imported into other databases, including ORCID and the WHO COVID‐19 Research Database. This poses a particular challenge for research evaluation in those countries, where cloned versions of approved journals may be used to acquire publications and verifying their authenticity can be difficult.
Web of science
Cite
Citations (12)
To assess the quality and impact of medication safety outputs issued by the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) to the NHS in England and Wales.A multi-method study comprising (1) focus groups and interviews with NHS Chief Pharmacists and (2) an electronic survey of medical, nursing and clinical governance directors.Acute sector respondents agreed that the medication outputs had a major impact on patient safety. Pharmacists welcomed national support for medication safety improvement, despite the resulting workload. Medical Directors were much less likely to be aware of alerts and Rapid Response Reports (RRRs) than their nursing and clinical governance colleagues. One key finding was the inability of around half of NHS trusts to communicate effectively and reliably with their junior doctors.Medication alerts issued by the NPSA have stimulated significant work to improve medication safety and are believed to have had an important impact on patient safety.
Clinical Governance
Cite
Citations (13)
У зв‘язку із Європейською інтеграцією для оцінки ефективності наукової діяльності роботи викладачів використовуються кількісні оцінки за допомогою публікацій у науко метричних базах Scopus та Web of Science. Таким чином передбачається збільшення відсотка публікації українських вчених у світі. На жаль, такий підхід не враховує незалежну експертну оцінку результатів із врахуванням затребуваності світовою наукою, специфіку навчальної дисципліни, характер колаборації. Колаборація визначається кількістю вчених, що займаються написанням роботи. Також така кількісна оцінка не враховує рівня журналу, в якому була опублікована наукова стаття. Це призводить до неправильної оцінки рівня наукової діяльності науко-педагогічних кадрів у навчальних закладах освіти. Наукометричні бази Scopus та Web of Science використовують індекс Хірша для кількісної оцінки показників науковця.
Web of science
Cite
Citations (0)