Environmental stimuli and intestinal stem cell behavior

2012 
The intestine carries out important functions related to digestion and absorption. It is composed of three distinct layers, an outer muscle layer, a mesenchymal layer and the epithelial layer. The epithelial layer forms the protective barrier that faces the luminal content of the intestine. In order to maintain barrier function the epithelial layer needs constant replenishment. This is ensured by continuous cellular replication in proliferative crypt compartments. Following exit from the crypt, cells adopt fates along either secretory or absorptive lineage and will, after three to four days, be exfoliated into the lumen of the intestine from the tips of the villi. Intestinal stem cells located at the bottom of the proliferative crypt compartment ensure lifelong maintenance of the organ (Fig. 1A). Figure 1. Diagram of the intestinal stem cell niche. (A) Lgr5-expressing columnar-based crypt cells (CBCs) intercalated between Paneth cells are indicated in green. Stem cells located in position +4 are yellow. Lrig1 is expressed in a gradient ... Adult stem cell niches are far more heterogeneous than previously anticipated.1 The intestinal stem cell niche can be subdivided by the relative position within the crypt. Stem cells located in position +4, just above secretory Paneth cells, express HopX, Bmi1 and Tert. These cells are generally less mitotically active than Lgr5-expressing stem cells located at the bottom of the proliferative crypts intercalated between Paneth cells (Fig. 1A).2,3 It has been argued that both populations represent the most primitive stem cell; however, recent studies suggest that stem cells can interconvert between the two states (Fig. 1B).3 Fate mapping from cells in position 4 and at the bottom of the crypt supports this.2,4 The positional cues responsible for cellular sorting into different functional stem cell compartments are poorly characterized. The only known effector of cellular positioning is Wnt (wingless-related MMTV integration site) signaling.5 Wnt is highly expressed by Paneth cells along with other mitotic factors, such as ErbB and Notch ligands.6 This could functionally account for the differences observed in proliferative potential along the stem cell axis. The discrete expression patterns of Lgr5 and HopX also support the existence of distinct microenvironments that supports cellular identities. A thorough characterization of the factors responsible for stem cell identity will help delineate and define the functional relationship between the distinct stem cell populations. Tissue homeostasis is governed by balanced loss and gain of cells. The stem cell niche supports constant proliferation via pro-mitotic stimuli. In order to control the amplitude of signaling strength, many pathways have developed negative feedback loops. Lrig1 (Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 1) is a negative feedback regulator of ErbB-mediated growth factor signaling.7 Lrig1 marks stem cells in various epithelial tissues including the intestinal epithelium, where it is expressed within the entire stem cell niche including the +4 and Lgr5-expressing cells (Fig. 1).8,9 The functional relevance of Lrig1 and negative feedback regulation is clear from the pronounced expansion of the intestinal stem cell compartment observed in the Lrig1-KO mouse model.9 This is mediated via increased ErbB signaling and demonstrates the importance of balanced signaling strength within the stem cell niche.9 Moreover, an independent study reveals that Lrig1-KO animals have a higher incidence of colorectal cancer, suggesting that unbalanced stem cell proliferation increases tumor susceptibility.10 Future studies will address whether additional feedback regulators control signaling strength within the intestinal stem cell niche and how homeostasis within the stem cell compartment affects tumor susceptibility.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    9
    References
    0
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []