Our previous studies have shown that quercetin inhibits Cox-2 and Bcl-2 expressions, and induces human leukemia HL-60 cell apoptosis. In order to investigate the role of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) on quercetin-induced apoptosis of HL-60 cells, we used flow cytometry to detect cell apoptosis. The expressions of LKB1, phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK), and Cox-2 protein were detected in HL-60 cells and normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by western blot. The expressions of LKB1, p-AMPK, and Cox-2 were detected in HL-60 cells after culture with quercetin. The expressions of p-AMPK were detected in HL-60 cells after culture with AMPK inhibitor Compound C. Then, the expressions of LKB1, p-AMPK, and Cox-2 were detected in HL-60 cells after culture with quercetin alone or quercetin + Compound C. It was found that there was no significant difference in LKB1 between PBMCs and HL-60. p-AMPK in PBMCs was higher than that in HL-60, while Cox-2 was lower. After culture of HL-60 with quercetin, p-AMPK was increased, Cox-2 was decreased, but LKB1 remained unchanged. After culture of HL-60 with Compound C, p-AMPK was decreased. There was no significant difference in LKB1 between the quercetin-alone and the quercetin + Compound C groups. p-AMPK decreased more significantly, while Cox-2 increased more significantly in the quercetin + Compound C groups than those in the quercetin-alone groups. Taken together, these findings suggested that quercetin activates AMPK expression in HL-60 cells independent of LKB1 activation, inhibits Cox-2 expression by activating AMPK, and further regulates the Bcl-2-dependent pathways of apoptosis to exert its anti-leukemia effect.
To investigate the effect of a microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) inhibitor MK886 on cell cycle of the human acute myeloid leukemia HL-60 cells. HL-60 cells were treated with different concentration of MK886 (10, 25, 50 µmol/L) for 24 h. Flow cytometry, Western blot and ELISA were used to measure cell cycle, cyclin D1, mPGES-1, PGE(2), Akt, P-Akt and C-MYC. The results indicated that after treated with MK886, the percentage of HL-60 cells decreased in G(0)/G(1) phase and increased in S phase, and expressions of mPGES-1, cyclin D1, P-Akt and C-MYC and synthesis of PGE(2) decreased significantly. It is concluded that MK886 can arrest HL-60 cells in G(0)/G(1) phase, the mechanism of which is possibly associated to inhibition of mPGES-1 expression, reduction of PGE(2) synthesis, suppression of Akt phosphorylation and C-MYC expression, down-regulation of cyclin D1 expression.
Compared with HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplant, the outcomes of haploidentical donor (HID) transplant for refractory acute leukemia need to be further explored. In this study, we compared the outcomes of HID with MSD for refractory acute leukemia.This study population came from two prospective multicenter trials (NCT01883180, NCT02673008). Two hundred and seventy-eight patients with refractory acute leukemia were enrolled in this study, including 119 in HID group and 132 in MSD group. Sequential intensified conditioning was employed in all patients, and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was administered in patients in the absence of active GVHD and according to minimal residual disease (MRD) from day + 60 post-transplantation for preventing relapse.The complete remission of leukemia by day + 30 post-transplant were 94% and 93%, respectively, in HID and MSD groups (p = .802). The 1-year incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD was 62% and 54% (p = .025), and 3-year incidence of chronic GVHD was 55% and 55% (p = .789), respectively, in two groups. HID transplant had lower incidence of first episode of MRD positivity and relapse than MSD transplant (28% vs 45%, p = .006; 26% vs 38%, p = .034). There was higher infection-related mortality in HID than MSD (8% vs 2%, p = .049) within the first 100 days' post-transplant. The 5-year overall survival was 46% and 42% (p = .832), respectively; the 5-year disease-free survival was 43% and 39% (p = .665), in HID and MSD groups, respectively.HID transplant has lower relapse, but higher infection-related mortality and similar survival rates in refractory acute leukemia by the strategy of sequential intensified conditioning followed by DLI compared with MSD transplant.
Background: Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after allo-HSCT is a devastating complication with limited therapeutic options. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in BOS after allo-HSCT.Methods: Eighty-one allo-HSCT recipients with BOS diagnosed within 6 months were enrolled in this multicentre prospective cohort study. The choice of prednisone and azithromycin combined with or without MSCs was based on patient preferences (MSC n=49, non-MSC n=32). The primary endpoint was response rate at 3 months, defined as the proportion of patients achieving FEV1 improvement or steroid sparing.Findings: Response rate was 35/49 patients (71%, 95% CI 59 to 84%) and 14/32 (44%, 27 to 61%) in MSC and non-MSC group, respectively (p=0*013). The addition of MSCs was associated with a better difference for change in FEV1 rate of decline, compared to non-MSC group (53 ml/months, 2 to 103; p=0*040). The 3-year overall survival post-diagnosis was 70*6% (55*9 to 85*3%) and 58*2% (36*1 to 78*5%) in MSC and non-MSC group, respectively (p=0*21). Clinical improvement was accompanied by a significant increase of interleukin (IL)-10-producing CD5+B cells. Infections and leukemia relapse were no significant difference between two groups. MSCs were well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. Interpretation: MSCs might be an effective and safe therapy for BOS after allo-HSCT. These data also offer insight into potential biological mechanisms of MSC treatment and support further investigation in larger randomized controlled trials. Our study strengthens evidence for clinical practice of MSC therapy in BOS.Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02543073.Funding Statement: This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA105500 and 2017YFA105504), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81770190 and 81700176), the Health Collaborative Innovation Major Projects of Guangzhou City (201508020254), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2014B020226004).Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.Ethics Approval Statement: The protocol was approved by institutional review board at each centre. Written informed consents were obtained from all participants in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(23.036 .093 25.536)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(45.87 1.273 16.18)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(69.945 .996 12.078)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(20.66 -19.689 31.932)'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)