Supplementary Figure S2 from Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Biomarker-Stratified Phase Ib Microbiome Modulation in Melanoma: Impact of Antibiotic Preconditioning on Microbiome and Immunity
Isabella C. GlitzaYongwoo David SeoChristine N. SpencerJennifer R. WortmanElizabeth M. BurtonFarah A. AlayliChristopher P. LooShikha GautamAshish DamaniaJulie DensmoreJustin FairchildChristopher R. CabanskiMatthew C. WongChristine B. PetersonBrian WeinerNathan HicksJohn AuniņšChristopher McChalicherEmily WalshMichael T. TetzlaffOmid HamidPatrick A. OttGenevieve M. BolandRyan J. SullivanKenneth F. GrossmannNadim J. AjamiTheresa LaValleeMatthew R. HennHussein A. TawbiJennifer A. Wargo
0
Citation
0
Reference
10
Related Paper
Abstract:
<p>Spiderplot demonstrating change of lesion size from pre-treatment baseline</p>In 459 migraine attacks, information provided to patients (from negative to neutral to positive) modified placebo and medication outcomes in a progressive fashion.
Pill
Cite
Citations (364)
Μελέτη της πολυπαραγοντικής αναλγησίας στο μετεγχειρητικό πόνο μετά από λαπαροσκοπική χολοκυστεκτομή
Σκοπός:Ο βασικός σκοπός της μελέτης ήταν να ελεγχθεί αν ο συνδυασμός γκαμπαπεντίνης (600mg 4ώρες προεγχειρητικά, 600mg 24ώρες μετά), κεταμίνης (0.3mg/kg πριν την αναισθησία), λορνοξικάμης (8mg πριν την αναισθησία και 8mg/12ώρες) και τοπικής έγχυσης ροπιβακαΐνης (5ml 7.5% στα σημεία εισόδου των trocar) έχει καλύτερη αναλγητική δράση σε σχέση με το καθένα από αυτά τα φάρμακα ξεχωριστά τις πρώτες 24 ώρες μετά από λαπαροσκοπική χολοκυστεκτομή. Δευτερεύων σκοπός ήταν να εξετασθεί αν αυτός συνδυασμός έχει λιγότερες επιπλοκές σχετιζόμενες με την κατανάλωση οπιοειδών.Μέθοδος:Διεξήχθη μία ελεγχόμενη τυχαιοποιημένη μελέτη σε 2 νοσηλευτικά κέντρα. 148 ασθενείς ηλικίας 18-70 ετών κατανεμήθηκαν τυχαία σε 6 ομάδες (28 σε κάθε ομάδα) με τη χρήση λογισμικού: A (γκαμπαπεντίνη/κεταμίνη/λορνοξικάμη/ροπιβακαΐνη), B (γκαμπαπεντίνη/placebo/placebo/placebo), Γ (placebo/κεταμίνη/placebo/placebo), Δ (placebo/placebo/λορνοξικάμη/placebo), E (placebo/placebo/placebo/ροπιβακαΐνη) και ΣΤ (placebo/placebo/placebo/placebo). Μόνο ο κύριος ερευνητής γνώριζε την ομάδα κάθε ασθενούς και παρείχε τα φάρμακα και τα εικονικά φάρμακα σε καλυμμένες προγεμισμένες σύριγγες. Η κύρια έκβαση της μελέτης ήταν η 24ωρη κατανάλωση μορφίνης. Δευτερεύουσες εκβάσεις ήταν η συχνότητα των σχετιζόμενων με τα οπιοειδή επιπλοκών (ναυτία, έμετος, καταστολή, κνησμός και δυσκολία ούρησης).Αποτελέσματα:Μόνο οι ομάδες Α (6.4mg), B (9.46mg) και Δ (9.36mg) είχαν χαμηλότερη κατανάλωση μορφίνης σε σχέση με την ομάδα ελέγχου (20.29mg) (p<0.001, p=0.01 και p=0.008 αντίστοιχα). Η ομάδα Α δε διέφερε από τις ομάδες Β και Δ (p=0.92, p=0.93). Υπήρξε διαφορά μόνο στα επεισόδια ναυτίας και μόνο μεταξύ των ομάδων Α (n=5) και της ομάδας ελέγχου (n=12) (p=0.018). Συμπεράσματα:Ο συνδυασμός γκαμπαπεντίνης, κεταμίνης, λορνοξικάμης, και τοπικής έγχυσης ροπιβακαΐνης δεν έχει ισχυρότερη αναλγητική δράση σε σχέση με μόνη την γκαμπαπεντίνη ή τη λορνοξικάμη μετά από λαπαροσκοπική χολοκυστεκτομή. Ο συνδυασμός μειώνει μόνο τη συχνότητα της μετεγχειρητικής ναυτίας αλλά απαιτούνται μεγαλύτερες μελέτες για την εξαγωγή ασφαλών συμπερασμάτων.
Placebo group
Placebo response
Cite
Citations (0)
Placebo response
Placebo group
Cite
Citations (110)
While ethics of placebo use has been debated since discovery of the phenomena, there has yet to be a study that examines the aftereffect of individuals learning of a personal placebo response on their future ability to experience a placebo response. In the first study, eleven participants diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome in a placebo study were interviewed individually about their personal placebo response. We found no changes in attitudes about the likelihood of using medical and non-medical treatments for pain, likelihood of participating in future studies or likeability and trust of experimenters. In addition, we found no changes in mood except for a slight improvement in frustration. In the second study, 77 undergraduate students from the University of Florida were divided into three conditions: placebo, control and repeated baseline. We used a double placebo design with verbal placebo suggestion and conditioning to induce a placebo response and to examine the effect of providing information about a participant's personal placebo response on their future placebo response. Using a heat thermode, we discovered that there were no differences in future pain responding between participants who were told that they experienced a placebo response versus those who were not. In addition, similar to the first study, we found no detrimental effects of the placebo information variables measured. These studies suggest the placebo response persists even after revelation of a personal placebo response and placebo use does not appear to cause adverse effects on mood and other attitude variables assessed.
Placebo response
Nocebo
Nocebo Effect
Cite
Citations (43)
Placebo response
Cite
Citations (2)
To examine whether there are gender differences in event-related potential (ERP) responses to painful stimulation after administration of placebo medication; and to investigate whether placebo medication reduces anticipatory stress and if this reduction can explain the placebo analgesic response. Several experimental and clinical studies have shown that males report lower pain compared with females. There are, however, few reports of gender differences in placebo analgesia.All subjects (n = 33; 17 women) participated in both a natural history and a placebo condition. ERPs were evoked by heat pulses with a peak at 52 °C.The results showed that pain unpleasantness and the N2/P2 ERP components were reduced in the placebo condition compared with the natural history condition. Only men displayed placebo responses in pain report and in the P2 component. Anticipatory stress was reduced after placebo administration, and the reduction in anticipatory stress was significantly related to the placebo effect on pain. Regression analyses revealed that the interaction of gender by anticipatory stress was significantly related to the mean placebo response, with men responding with lower stress after placebo medication, and larger placebo responses.A placebo response on pain unpleasantness was observed in men only, and reduced stress after placebo administration was observed in males only. Thus, reduced stress may be a mechanism for placebo responses in pain.
Placebo response
Cite
Citations (115)
Placebo response
Drug response
Cite
Citations (30)
A previous meta-analysis of clinical analgesic trial studies showed generally low magnitudes of placebo analgesia (N. Engl. J. Med. 344 (2001) 1594). However, as studies included in their analysis used only placebo as a control condition, we conducted two meta-analyses, one in which 23 studies used only placebo as a control condition, and one in which 14 studies investigated placebo analgesic mechanisms. Magnitudes of placebo analgesic effects were much higher in the latter (mean effect size=0.95) as compared to the former (mean effect size=0.15) and were significantly different (P=0.003). This difference as well as differences in effect sizes within studies of placebo mechanisms may be parsimoniously explained by differences in expected pain levels produced by placebo suggestions and by conditioning. Furthermore, some of the studies of placebo analgesic mechanisms indicate that the magnitude of placebo analgesia is higher when the placebo analgesic effect is induced via suggestion combined with conditioning than via suggestion alone or conditioning alone. Based on these findings, we suggest that placebo analgesic effects are most optimally conceptualized in terms of perception of the placebo agent, and therefore a new definition of placebo response is proposed.
Cite
Citations (421)