Uptake, discontinuation, and continuation rate of long-acting contraceptive methods when offered at no cost in Campinas, Brazil
Montas LaporteAna C. MarcelinoPaula da Cunha PereiraXimena Espejo‐ArceCassia T. JuliatoLuís Bahamondes
1
Citation
19
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Keywords:
Discontinuation
Levonorgestrel
Intrauterine device
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Contraceptive implant
Etonogestrel
Etonogestrel
Discontinuation
Contraceptive implant
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Continuation
Cite
Citations (1)
Etonogestrel
Contraceptive implant
Medical abortion
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Cite
Citations (18)
Etonogestrel
Contraceptive implant
Medical abortion
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Cite
Citations (0)
Objectives: The aims of the study were to correlate endometriosis-associated pain, evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, with serum levels of etonogestrel (ENG), levonorgestrel (LNG), CA-125 and soluble CD23 in users of the ENG implant or the 52-mg LNG-releasing intrauterine system (52 mg LNG-IUS) for up to 2 years after device placement.Methods: A randomised trial was conducted at the University of Campinas Medical School, Brazil. All participants (n = 103) had had endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain or dysmenorrhoea, or both, for more than 6 months. Participants were randomly assigned to use an ENG implant (experimental treatment) or a 52-mg LNG-IUS (active comparator). Follow-up was conducted 6 monthly for up to 24 months after device placement. Dysmenorrhoea and chronic pelvic pain were evaluated using a VAS and the scores were correlated with serum levels of ENG, LNG, CA-125 and soluble CD23.Results: Both progestin-only contraceptives significantly reduced VAS scores for dysmenorrhoea and chronic pelvic pain and reduced serum levels of soluble CD23 (p < 0.001). Serum levels of CA-125 decreased only in the ENG implant group after 24 months' use of the device (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between pain scores and ENG or LNG serum levels over time (p > 0.005).Conclusion: Both contraceptives improved dysmenorrhoea and chronic pelvic pain scores in women with endometriosis-associated pain and they reduced serum levels of soluble CD23; however, serum levels of CA-125 were reduced only in ENG implant users over the 24-month study period.
Etonogestrel
Levonorgestrel
Contraceptive implant
Desogestrel
Intrauterine device
Cite
Citations (26)
Levonorgestrel
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Contraceptive implant
Intrauterine device
Cite
Citations (0)
Etonogestrel
Contraceptive implant
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Continuation
Cite
Citations (37)
BackgroundAs the popularity of long-acting reversible contraception increases, so does the need for accurate data on method continuation in diverse clinical settings. We determined 2-year continuation rates for the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device, the copper T380A intrauterine device, and the 68-mg etonogestrel contraceptive implant in an academic healthcare system with mixed-payer reimbursement.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the proportion and characteristics of women who continue intrauterine device and implant use to 2 years and to relate continuation to device type when controlling for patient characteristics.Study DesignThis retrospective chart review assessed University of Utah Healthcare System patients who had an intrauterine device or contraceptive implant inserted between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2012. We identified users and dates of insertions and removals by querying billing, medication, and procedural data in the Electronic Data Warehouse. Multivariable Poisson regression was conducted to estimate incidence risk ratios and to relate the probability of 2-year continuous use to device type.ResultsData on 8603 device insertions were obtained with the following distribution: levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine devices (6459; 75.1%), copper T380A intrauterine devices (1136; 13.2%), and 68-mg etonogestrel implant (1008; 11.7%). Two-year continuation rates were 77.8%, 73.1%, and 75.9%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in 2-year continuation between levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device users (adjusted risk ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–1.1) and 68-mg etonogestrel implant users (adjusted risk ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–1.1) compared with copper device users, after we controlled for age, Hispanic ethnicity, payer type, and year of insertion. Older-age, self-pay, or public payer insurance (reference commercial payer) and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with 2-year continuation.ConclusionThree-quarters of women with an intrauterine device or implant continue using it for 2 years. In this cohort, the 2-year continuation rates were 77.8%, 73.1%, and 75.9% for the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device, copper T380A intrauterine device, and 68-mg etonogestrel implant, respectively. As the popularity of long-acting reversible contraception increases, so does the need for accurate data on method continuation in diverse clinical settings. We determined 2-year continuation rates for the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device, the copper T380A intrauterine device, and the 68-mg etonogestrel contraceptive implant in an academic healthcare system with mixed-payer reimbursement. The purpose of this study was to examine the proportion and characteristics of women who continue intrauterine device and implant use to 2 years and to relate continuation to device type when controlling for patient characteristics. This retrospective chart review assessed University of Utah Healthcare System patients who had an intrauterine device or contraceptive implant inserted between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2012. We identified users and dates of insertions and removals by querying billing, medication, and procedural data in the Electronic Data Warehouse. Multivariable Poisson regression was conducted to estimate incidence risk ratios and to relate the probability of 2-year continuous use to device type. Data on 8603 device insertions were obtained with the following distribution: levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine devices (6459; 75.1%), copper T380A intrauterine devices (1136; 13.2%), and 68-mg etonogestrel implant (1008; 11.7%). Two-year continuation rates were 77.8%, 73.1%, and 75.9%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in 2-year continuation between levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device users (adjusted risk ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–1.1) and 68-mg etonogestrel implant users (adjusted risk ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–1.1) compared with copper device users, after we controlled for age, Hispanic ethnicity, payer type, and year of insertion. Older-age, self-pay, or public payer insurance (reference commercial payer) and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with 2-year continuation. Three-quarters of women with an intrauterine device or implant continue using it for 2 years. In this cohort, the 2-year continuation rates were 77.8%, 73.1%, and 75.9% for the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device, copper T380A intrauterine device, and 68-mg etonogestrel implant, respectively.
Etonogestrel
Intrauterine device
Contraceptive implant
Levonorgestrel
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Cite
Citations (29)
Etonogestrel
Intrauterine device
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Levonorgestrel
Contraceptive implant
Cite
Citations (19)
Recently published evidence from 2 large studies find that the duration of effectiveness of the etonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant to be at least 5 years (compared with the current 3-year label), and for the 20 µg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system at least 7 years (compared with the current 5-year label).
Levonorgestrel
Etonogestrel
Contraceptive implant
Desogestrel
Cite
Citations (26)