logo
    Immediate postpartum etonogestrel implant: a contraception option with long-term continuation
    37
    Citation
    29
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Citation Trend
    Keywords:
    Etonogestrel
    Contraceptive implant
    Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Continuation
    Background Etonogestrel (ENG) implants (Implanon ® /Nexplanon ® /Implanon NXT ® ) are employed as contraception in early postpartum patients. Follow-up is often not conducted by the hospital prescriber. Little is known about duration of lochia, in a modern setting, and even less is known about the effect of ENG implants on lochia. Aims To determine if early postpartum (pre-discharge) insertion of Implanon for contraception was associated with a significant difference in duration of lochia. To record the number of patients who went on to have their Implanon removed during the study period and the reasons for removal. Methods Prospective cohort study of 152 postpartum patients from a tertiary maternity unit in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. The treatment group was women requesting Implanon prior to discharge. Controls were recruited from the same unit over the same time period, with the aim to match for birth weight and parity. Information was collected during face-to-face interviews or via telephone contact. Multivariate survival analysis was used to investigate lochia duration. Results There were 73 controls and 79 women who had early postpartum Implanon inserted. Fourteen (17.7%) patients in the treatment group had their Implanon removed during the postpartum study period. In all of these cases the reason for removal was bleeding disturbance – prolonged or intermittent vaginal bleeding beyond 50 days postpartum. There was no significant difference in duration of lochia between the groups [median predicted duration 25 days (95% CI 22–27) in controls and 24 days (95% CI 21–26) in the treatment group]. Conclusions Early postpartum insertion of Implanon for contraception was not associated with a statistically or clinically significant difference in duration of lochia.
    Etonogestrel
    Contraceptive implant
    Women with long-acting, reversible contraceptive devices inserted may choose to remove them prior to their planned expiry dates.The objective of this study was to explore Australian women's experiences with the etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implant (Implanon NXT) and why they had it removed early.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 women between June 2013 and January 2014. Transcriptions of the audio-taped interviews were analysed using a constant comparative analysis framework.Two core themes of participants' responses that were identified in this study were influences on choice of contraception, which included convenience and information sources; and influences on removal of contraception, which included side effects and their negative impacts on relationships and financial costs.This study highlights that women's experiences with side effects contribute to the early removal of long-acting contraceptive devices such as Implanon NXT. This study emphasises the importance of general practitioners (GPs) in providing comprehensive information about the benefits and potential side effects associated with using these implants.
    Contraceptive implant
    Etonogestrel
    Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Citations (11)
    Etonogestrel
    Levonorgestrel
    Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Contraceptive implant
    Desogestrel
    Hormonal contraception
    Intrauterine device
    Levonorgestrel
    Etonogestrel
    Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Intrauterine device
    Contraceptive implant
    Clinical Research
    To assess temporal trends in the uptake and continuation of the etonogestrel subdermal implant in a large private practice setting.This was a retrospective cohort study based on billing records from a large multispecialty private practice in Las Vegas, Nevada. We looked at women of all ages seeking long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. The main outcome measure was uptake of the etonogestrel subdermal implant, expressed as a fraction of all insertions of LARC across four calendar years (2013-2016). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 12-month continuation stratified by year of insertion.There were 3477 total LARC insertions across the 4-year study period. In unadjusted analyses, the uptake of the etonogestrel implant increased from 3.0% of LARC insertions in 2013 to 9% in 2016 among women aged 30 years and older. For women younger than 30 years, the uptake of the implant stayed stable from 2013 to 2015 (22.8%, 21.7%, and 22.4%, respectively), but increased to 30.9% in 2016. We modeled the uptake of the implant as a function of year of insertion adjusted for age (continuous) and insurance status (private vs. Medicaid), and we stratified the models by age (younger than 30 years, 30 years, and older than 30 years). The positive association between year of insertion and uptake of the implant was significantly stronger for women aged 30 years and older, compared to women younger than 30 years. There was a progressive decrease in the 12-month continuation of implant from 2013 (95.7%) to 2015 (57.7%).In this large private practice setting, among women aged 30 years and older, we observed a threefold increase in the uptake of the subdermal implant from 2013 to 2016. We also observed a significant decrease in the 12-month continuation of the implant over time. Further studies of implant uptake and continuation in the private practice setting are needed.
    Etonogestrel
    Contraceptive implant
    Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Private practice
    Citations (3)