Autograft Cellular Contribution to Spinal Fusion and Effects of Intraoperative Storage Conditions
0
Citation
36
Reference
10
Related Paper
Abstract:
Study Design. Controlled animal study. Objective. To assess the cellular contribution of autograft to spinal fusion and determine the effects of intraoperative storage conditions on fusion. Summary of Background Data. Autograft is considered the gold standard graft material in spinal fusion, purportedly due to its osteogenic properties. Autograft consists of adherent and non-adherent cellular components within a cancellous bone scaffold. However, neither the contribution of each component to bone healing is well understood nor are the effects of intraoperative storage of autograft. Materials and Methods. Posterolateral spinal fusion was performed in 48 rabbits. Autograft groups evaluated included: (1) Viable, (2) partially devitalized, (3) devitalized, (4) dried, and (5) hydrated iliac crest. Partially devitalized and devitalized grafts were rinsed with saline, removing nonadherent cells. Devitalized graft was, in addition, freeze/thawed, lysing adherent cells. For 90 minutes before implantation, air dried iliac crest was left on the back table whereas the hydrated iliac crest was immersed in saline. At 8 weeks, fusion was assessed through manual palpation, radiography, and microcomputed tomography. In addition, the cellular viability of cancellous bone was assayed over 4 hours. Results. Spinal fusion rates by manual palpation were not statistically different between viable (58%) and partially devitalized (86%) autografts ( P = 0.19). Both rates were significantly higher than devitalized and dried autograft (both 0%, P < 0.001). In vitro bone cell viability was reduced by 37% after 1 hour and by 63% after 4 hours when the bone was left dry ( P < 0.001). Bone cell viability and fusion performance (88%, P < 0.001 vs . dried autograft) were maintained when the graft was stored in saline. Conclusions. The cellular component of autograft is important for spinal fusion. Adherent graft cells seem to be the more important cellular component in the rabbit model. Autograft left dry on the back table showed a rapid decline in cell viability and fusion but was maintained with storage in saline.Keywords:
Iliac crest
Cancellous bone
Pagetoid
Palpation
Study Design. Controlled animal study. Objective. To assess the cellular contribution of autograft to spinal fusion and determine the effects of intraoperative storage conditions on fusion. Summary of Background Data. Autograft is considered the gold standard graft material in spinal fusion, purportedly due to its osteogenic properties. Autograft consists of adherent and non-adherent cellular components within a cancellous bone scaffold. However, neither the contribution of each component to bone healing is well understood nor are the effects of intraoperative storage of autograft. Materials and Methods. Posterolateral spinal fusion was performed in 48 rabbits. Autograft groups evaluated included: (1) Viable, (2) partially devitalized, (3) devitalized, (4) dried, and (5) hydrated iliac crest. Partially devitalized and devitalized grafts were rinsed with saline, removing nonadherent cells. Devitalized graft was, in addition, freeze/thawed, lysing adherent cells. For 90 minutes before implantation, air dried iliac crest was left on the back table whereas the hydrated iliac crest was immersed in saline. At 8 weeks, fusion was assessed through manual palpation, radiography, and microcomputed tomography. In addition, the cellular viability of cancellous bone was assayed over 4 hours. Results. Spinal fusion rates by manual palpation were not statistically different between viable (58%) and partially devitalized (86%) autografts ( P = 0.19). Both rates were significantly higher than devitalized and dried autograft (both 0%, P < 0.001). In vitro bone cell viability was reduced by 37% after 1 hour and by 63% after 4 hours when the bone was left dry ( P < 0.001). Bone cell viability and fusion performance (88%, P < 0.001 vs . dried autograft) were maintained when the graft was stored in saline. Conclusions. The cellular component of autograft is important for spinal fusion. Adherent graft cells seem to be the more important cellular component in the rabbit model. Autograft left dry on the back table showed a rapid decline in cell viability and fusion but was maintained with storage in saline.
Iliac crest
Cancellous bone
Pagetoid
Palpation
Cite
Citations (0)
Autograft – Since before modern surgical techniques were described, ancient Greeks new of the possibilities for bone to grow after fracture. Studying open fractures, often post mortem, they new of the importance of both the “amount and integrity of bone architecture” that was necessary for two ends of a bone to heal. More recently, modern spinal surgical techniques, many pioneered by surgeons such as John Moe MD, use the same knowledge that for the intentional arthrodesis of two or more bony spinal levels there requires a certain amount and quality of bone – both capturing osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties. Autograft can be harvested in many ways for spinal arthrodesis and can be taken from iliac crest, tibia or fibula, and from local vertebral sources. Often requiring a separate skin and/or fascial incision, morbidities such as pain, neurovascular injury, infection, blood loss, haematoma, seroma, and fracture can plague the technique. Limited quantities, especially in children, can also be an issue with autograft. Cancellous or cortico-cancellous structural grafts can be milled and used for posterolateral fusion, interbody fusion, and can be mixed with other graft substitutes/expanders. Morbidity profile aside, autograft still remains the gold standard for spinal arthrodesis with regards “ideal properties” of bone grafts. Allograft – Currently, allograft is the most common substitute for autograft bone in spinal fusion. Allograft is primarily osteoconductive, with minimal osteoinductive potential. Avoidance of donor site morbidity, quantity issues, and surgical time saving are all features of allograft. Increased costs and potential for infection are negative issues. Preparation can vary and fresh unprocessed grafts are no longer used. Freeze drying (lyophilization) involves drying of the grafts before freezing at sub zero temperatures, and the technique reduces immunogenicity, though upon rehydration, structural strength is lost by around 50%. Low dose radiation ( Incorporation of allograft is similar to that of autograft, though the process takes more time. Allograft cancellous particles provide a larger surface area and therefore incorporate faster. Studies suggest that mulched allograft femoral heads provides as good a fusion rate in posterior spinal surgeries for children with scoliosis as does the use of autograft. Combination of osteoinductive agents (BMP etc) with allograft is now possible and will likely enhance its further use. Structural fibular allografts in cervical interbody fusion and femoral ring allografts in lumbar interbody fusion have been well described and have very high rates of fusion.
Iliac crest
Cancellous bone
Neurovascular bundle
Pseudarthrosis
Cite
Citations (0)
OBJECT The authors' objectives were to compare the rate of fusion after occipitoatlantoaxial arthrodesis using structural allograft with the fusion rate from using autograft, to evaluate correction of radiographic parameters, and to describe symptom relief with each graft technique. METHODS The authors assessed radiological fusion at 6 and 12 months after surgery and obtained radiographic measurements of C1-2 and C2-7 lordotic angles, C2-7 sagittal vertical alignments, and posterior occipitocervical angles at preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up examinations. Demographic data, intraoperative details, adverse events, and functional outcomes were collected from hospitalization records. Radiological fusion was defined as the presence of bone trabeculation and no movement between the graft and the occiput or C-2 on routine flexion-extension cervical radiographs. Radiographic measurements were obtained from lateral standing radiographs with patients in the neutral position. RESULTS At the University of Utah, 28 adult patients underwent occipitoatlantoaxial arthrodesis between 2003 and 2010 using bicortical allograft, and 11 patients were treated using iliac crest autograft. Mean follow-up for all patients was 20 months (range 1-108 months). Of the 27 patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, 18 (95%) of 19 in the allograft group and 8 (100%) of 8 in the autograft group demonstrated evidence of bony fusion shown by imaging. Patients in both groups demonstrated minimal deterioration of sagittal vertical alignment at final follow-up. Operative times were comparable, but patients undergoing occipitocervical fusion with autograft demonstrated greater blood loss (316 ml vs 195 ml). One (9%) of 11 patients suffered a significant complication related to autograft harvesting. CONCLUSIONS The use of allograft in occipitocervical fusion allows a high rate of successful arthrodesis yet avoids the potentially significant morbidity and pain associated with autograft harvesting. The safety and effectiveness profile is comparable with previously published rates for posterior C1-2 fusion using allograft.
Cite
Citations (21)
Cage
Discectomy
Cancellous bone
Diskectomy
Cite
Citations (11)
Iliac crest
Cancellous bone
Cite
Citations (1)
Iliac crest
Palpation
Cite
Citations (13)
Iliac crest
Palpation
Pseudarthrosis
Cite
Citations (21)
An iliac crest autograft is the gold standard for bone grafting in posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis but can be associated with significant donor-site morbidity. Conversely, an allograft has historically performed suboptimally for atlantoaxial arthrodesis as an onlay graft. The authors have modified a bone grafting technique to allow placement of a bicortical iliac crest allograft in an interpositional manner, and they evaluated it as an alternative to an autograft in posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis.The records of 89 consecutive patients in whom C1-2 arthrodesis was performed between 2001 and 2005 were reviewed.Forty-seven patients underwent 48 atlantoaxial arthrodeses with an allograft (mean follow-up 16.1 months, range 0-49 months), and 42 patients underwent autograft bone grafting (mean follow-up 17.6 months, range 0-61.0 months). The operative time was 50 minutes shorter in the allograft (mean 184 minutes, range 106-328 minutes) than in the autograft procedure (mean 234 minutes, range 154-358 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 50% lower in the allograft group than in the autograft group (mean 103 ml [range 30-200 ml] vs mean 206 ml [range 50-400 ml], respectively). Bone incorporation was initially slower in the allograft than in the autograft group but equalized by 12 months postprocedure. The respective fusion rates after 24 months were 96.7 and 88.9% for autografts and allografts. Complications at the donor site occurred in 16.7% of the autograft patients, including 1 pelvic fracture, 1 retained sponge, 1 infection, 2 hernias requiring repair, 2 hematomas, and persistent pain.The authors describe a technique for interpositional bone grafting between C-1 and C-2 that allows for the use of an allograft with excellent fusion results. This technique reduced the operative time and blood loss and eliminated donor-site morbidity.
Iliac crest
Bone grafting
Cite
Citations (42)
ABSTRACT
Background:
To evaluate the comparative abilities of commercially available, viable, cellular bone allografts to promote posterolateral spinal fusion.Methods:
Human allografts containing live cells were implanted in the athymic rat model of posterolateral spine fusion. Three commercially available allogeneic cellular bone matrices (Trinity Evolution, Trinity ELITE and Osteocel Plus) were compared with syngeneic iliac crest bone as the control. All spines underwent radiographs, manual palpation, and micro–computed tomography (CT) analysis after excision at 6 weeks. Histological sections of randomly selected spines were subjected to semiquantitative histopathological scoring for bone formation.Results:
By manual palpation, posterolateral fusion was detected in 40% (6/15) of spines implanted with syngeneic bone, whereas spines implanted with Trinity Evolution and Trinity ELITE allografts yielded 71% (10/14) and 77% (10/13) fusion, respectively. Only 7% (1/14) of spines implanted with Osteocel Plus allografts were judged fused by manual palpation (statistically significantly less than ELITE, P < .0007, and Evolution, P < .0013). The mineralized cancellous bone component of the allografts confounded radiographic analysis, but Trinity Evolution (0.452 ± 0.064) and Trinity ELITE (0.536 ± 0.109) allografts produced statistically significantly higher bone fusion mass volumes measured by quantitative micro-CT than did syngeneic bone (0.292 ± 0.109, P < .0001 for ELITE and P < .003 for Evolution) and Osteocel Plus (0.258 ± 0.103, P < .0001). Semiquantitative histopathological scores supported these findings because the total bone and bone marrow scores reflected significantly better new bone and marrow formation in the Trinity groups than in the Osteocel Plus group.Conclusions:
The Trinity Evolution and Trinity ELITE cellular bone allografts were more effective at creating posterolateral fusion than either the Osteocel Plus allografts or syngeneic bone in this animal model.Clinical Relevance:
The superior fusion rate of Trinity cellular bone allografts may lead to better clinical outcome of spinal fusion surgeries.Iliac crest
Palpation
Cancellous bone
Bone Formation
Cite
Citations (9)
Iliac crest
Demineralized bone matrix
Cancellous bone
Cite
Citations (14)