Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Concurrent Validity of a Stethoscope and Health App System for the Quantification of Breath Rate in Healthy Adults: Repeatability and Validity Study
0
Citation
15
Reference
10
Related Paper
Abstract:
Apps for smartphones that can measure the breathing rate easily can be downloaded.The aim of this study was to demonstrate agreement in measuring breath rates between the stethoscope and Breath Counter health app.We performed a repeatability study with 56 healthy volunteers. The patient's demographic data and breathing rates per minute were collected. Breathing rates were measured via two methods: (1) using a stethoscope placed in the upper area of the right lung and (2) a Breath Counter app developed by Vadion on a Samsung Fold smartphone.This study demonstrated high repeatability and validity with respect to the breathing rate parameter of healthy adults using the aforementioned 2 systems. Intrasession repeatability measure using the intraclass correlation coefficient was >0.962, indicating excellent repeatability. Moreover, the intraclass correlation coefficient between methods was 0.793, indicating good repeatability, and coefficients of variation of method errors values were 1.83% with very low values in terms of other repeatability parameters. We found significant correlation coefficients and no systematic differences between the app and stethoscope methods.The app method may be attractive to individuals who require repeatability in a recreational setting.Keywords:
Repeatability
Stethoscope
Coefficient of variation
Cite
Abstract Criteria are given for the choice of scale prior to estimation of repeatability. Recommendations of Bland and Altman should then be used for expressing repeatability and agreement of methods of measurement on the same scale. Repeatability of measurements on different scales should be compared using the appropriate ratio of variances, or intraclass correlation coefficient. A reference range for diagnosis requires a high ratio of between‐subject variation to total variation. The index of separation between diseased and healthy subjects should be used whenever possible. Changes within patients should be compared with reference change ranges, and not against the diagnostic range.
Repeatability
Coefficient of variation
Cite
Citations (157)
The accuracy, reliability and reproducibility of electric pulp tests (EPT) have been investigated but there is conflicting information about their repeatability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether EPT are repeatable over time. EPT results from 180 healthy teeth in 39 patients with 2-10 readings per tooth (total 692 readings) were analysed. Single measures intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranged from 0.776 to 0.845 in teeth with 2-7 repeated measures (P < 0.001), indicating good repeatability. With eight or more measures per tooth, the ICC was low, indicating poor repeatability over longer follow-up times, but only seven teeth in two subjects were included in this analysis. The Pearson correlation showed no statistically significant correlation for 2-7 readings but when all readings were included, there was a statistically significant negative correlation. Hence, EPT has good repeatability.
Repeatability
Cite
Citations (4)
ABSTRACTClinical relevance Evaluation of retinal macular oxygen saturation in healthy controls can aid in understanding the pathological changes seen in similar locations of those with vascular diseases like diabetes.Background The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest repeatability of localised retinal oximetry measurements in the macula on the Zilia Oximeter within healthy subjects of different races, 18–40 years old. Oxygen saturation was measured between three time points within the same locations of the right eye.Methods Twenty seven subjects were included (aged 26.3 ± 3.6 years). All were confirmed to have healthy retinas and at least 6/9 vision. Oximetry measurements were taken using the Zilia to acquire local oxygen saturation measurements (300 µm diameter) at four points 3.1 degrees from the fovea in the superior/temporal, superior/nasal, inferior/temporal, and inferior/nasal locations. Oximetry measurements were taken twice on the same day 20 minutes apart and then again 1–2 weeks later. Oximetry data was analysed with intraclass correlation between visits. To assess intrasubject repeatability, the Bland-Altman repeatability coefficient and coefficient of variation were calculated.Results Average Intraclass correlation for the three acquisition times of the right eye was 0.78. The averaged intrasubject repeatability coefficient for the three acquisition times was 8.4. The averaged coefficient of variation was 5.4%.Conclusion The Zilia oximeter has good macular test-retest repeatability; however, multiple measurements may be needed to ensure accuracy.KEYWORDS: Maculamicrovasculatureoximetryrepeatabilityretinopathy AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank Dr. Nimesh Patel for his advice on the analyses in this manuscript and Dr. Laura Frishman for her advice on this study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the American Academy of Optometry Foundation [Ezell Fellowship Award]; National Eye Institute [NIH T35 EY007088]; University of Houston [Startup Funds].
Repeatability
Coefficient of variation
Oxygen Saturation
Cite
Citations (3)
To determine repeatability and reproducibility of A-scan biometry quantitative findings in order to uniformly evaluate lenticular cataract changes.Seventeen eyes from seventeen cataract patients were examined by three (trainee ophthalmologists). Results (ratio of mean internal lens spikes height/lens anterior surface spike height) were compared using coefficient of variation (CV), repeatability coefficient (CR), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).Intra-observer consistency was CV = 0.36, CR = 0.49, and ICC = 0.778 for the first operator; CV = 0.33, CR = 0.52, and ICC = 0.642 for the second operator; and CV = 0.32, CR = 0.53, and ICC = 0.567 for the third operator. Concerning inter-observer agreement: CV (in 6 of 7 eyes) was > 8%, CR was > 0.21, and intraclass correlation coefficient for all eyes was < 0.81.Regarding repeatability and reproducibility, although there is a tendency for statistical significance, variability of the results does not allow the use of the method as a complementary clinical tool for comparing results. Standardization of this procedure, in order to achieve higher test reliability, might be the aim of relevant future studies, although there are a number of points that have to be addressed.
Repeatability
Coefficient of variation
Cite
Citations (3)
Apps for smartphones that can measure the breathing rate easily can be downloaded.The aim of this study was to demonstrate agreement in measuring breath rates between the stethoscope and Breath Counter health app.We performed a repeatability study with 56 healthy volunteers. The patient's demographic data and breathing rates per minute were collected. Breathing rates were measured via two methods: (1) using a stethoscope placed in the upper area of the right lung and (2) a Breath Counter app developed by Vadion on a Samsung Fold smartphone.This study demonstrated high repeatability and validity with respect to the breathing rate parameter of healthy adults using the aforementioned 2 systems. Intrasession repeatability measure using the intraclass correlation coefficient was >0.962, indicating excellent repeatability. Moreover, the intraclass correlation coefficient between methods was 0.793, indicating good repeatability, and coefficients of variation of method errors values were 1.83% with very low values in terms of other repeatability parameters. We found significant correlation coefficients and no systematic differences between the app and stethoscope methods.The app method may be attractive to individuals who require repeatability in a recreational setting.
Repeatability
Stethoscope
Coefficient of variation
Cite
Citations (0)
Repeatability
Cite
Citations (32)
The aim of this study was to evaluate repeatability and reproducibility of newly calculated biomechanical parameters of the cornea, developed by our research group.One eye from each of the 23 healthy subjects was measured three times consecutively, three times at different daytimes and on three different days. The within-subject standard deviation and coefficient of variation, as well as the intraclass correlation coefficient, were calculated for every parameter in each group.Excellent repeatability and reproducibility (coefficient of variation < 5%, intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.75) was found for corrected values measured at A1, HC, and A2 time points (2nd A2 Time, 2nd A1 Time, 2nd HC Time, 2nd HC Def Amp and 2nd A1 Def Amp). Corneal-specific stiffness parameters, which showed good repeatability and reliability, were DA_cor (coefficient of variation = 4.02%, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.919), KcLinear (coefficient of variation = 4.03%, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.895), areaForceCornea (coefficient of variation = 3.34%, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.853) and E2 (coefficient of variation = 4.1%, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.78). Overall, most parameters fell into the category of good reliability (high intraclass correlation coefficient) and poor reproducibility (low coefficient of variation), including all the parameters describing extraocular deformation (DA_ext, AEPvED, AUC EDef, areaForceExtra, Kg and μg). Comparing the coefficient of variation values for intrasession, intersession and daytime measurements, there were no indices for diurnal changes.Most parameters showed good repeatability and reliability. The extraocular stiffness parameters showed poor reproducibility. KcLinear can serve as a very reliable and repeatable indicator of corneal stiffness.
Repeatability
Coefficient of variation
Cite
Citations (16)
Acoustic rhinometry is a rapid, reliable and non-invasive technique for the evaluation of conditions associated with impaired nasal patency. This study aimed to examine the intersession repeatability of acoustic rhinometry measurements of unilateral and combined nasal parameters in a group of healthy volunteers.Twenty healthy volunteers were studied. In each subject, acoustic rhinometry measurements were performed on five consecutive days, with multiple recordings. Five clinically relevant parameters were measured in each session and the intersession repeatability of these measurements was expressed in terms of mean coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coefficient and inter-item correlations.Intraclass correlation coefficients showed a high, and greater repeatability over time for all the combined (mean) values compared to the unilateral values. All intraclass correlations for combined values were ≥0.80 confirming almost perfect agreement. All intraclass correlations and inter-item correlations were associated with P<0.001. The mean coefficient of variation was low (<10%) for all but the proximal minimum cross sectional area (MCA1) measurements.Acoustic rhinometry provides highly repeatable measurements of nasal patency, which is best for combined (mean) nasal parameters. This property makes it suitable for use in the diagnosis and follow-up of conditions associated with nasal obstruction, either structural or functional.
Acoustic Rhinometry
Repeatability
Coefficient of variation
Cite
Citations (12)
Few studies assess repeatability and reproducibility in registers of resonance frequency analysis (a value of dental implant stability).Few studies assess repeatability and reproducibility in resonance frequency analyses (implant stability evaluation). This study is aimed at assessing reliability (repeatabilty and reproducibility) in the Osstell Mentor® system using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as the statistical method.ISQ measurements of RFA were carried out by means of the Osstell Mentor® instrument in 58 implants in 19 patients. Six measurements were performed on each implant by means of two different Smart-Pegs (I and II). Three consecutive measurements were registered with each transducer.Average ISQ varied from 72.43 to 72.60 and 73.26 in the first, second and third measurements, respectively with the SamrtPeg I and from 72.98 to 73.26 and 73.74 in the first, second and third measurements, respectively with the SamrtPeg II . Exactly equal values were observed in 10.43 and 12.1% of the cases with Smart-Pegs I and II, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.96 and 0.96 for Smart Pegs I and II, respectively. Repeatability and reproducibility was 0.97 for both Smart-Pegs I and II.The RFA system contributed by Osstell Mentor® renders almost perfect reproducibility and repeatability, as proven by statistical analysis carried out by means of ICC with 95% confidence level. This instrument contributes highly reliable RFA measurements in dental implants.
Repeatability
Resonance frequency analysis
Cite
Citations (44)
Abstract To identify robust and reproducible methods of cerebellar morphometry that can be used in future large-scale structural MRI studies, we investigated the replicability, repeatability, and longterm reproducibility of three fully-automated software tools: FreeSurfer, CERES, and ACAPULCO. Replicability was defined as computational replicability, determined by comparing two analyses of the same high-resolution MRI data set performed with identical analysis software and computer hardware. Repeatability was determined by comparing the analyses of two MRI scans of the same participant taken during two independent MRI sessions on the same day for the Kirby-21 study. Long-term reproducibility was assessed by analyzing two MRI scans of the same participant in the longitudinal OASIS-2 study. We determined percent difference, the image intraclass correlation coefficient, the coefficient of variation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient between two analyses. Our results show that CERES and ACAPULCO use stochastic algorithms that result in surprisingly high differences between identical analyses for ACAPULCO and small differences for CERES. Changes between two consecutive scans from the Kirby-21 study were less than ±5% in most cases for FreeSurfer and CERES (i.e., demonstrating high repeatability). As expected, long-term reproducibility was lower than repeatability for all software tools. In summary, CERES is an accurate, as demonstrated before, and reproducible tool for fully-automated segmentation and parcellation of the cerebellum. We conclude with recommendations for the assessment of replicability, repeatability, and longterm reproducibility in future studies on cerebellar structure.
Repeatability
Coefficient of variation
Cite
Citations (2)