The impact of omalizumab on quality of life and its predictors in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: Real‐life data
28
Citation
0
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Omalizumab is a third-line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, the real-life data on the impact of omalizumab on CSU-related quality of life (QoL) remain scarce.To investigate the impact of omalizumab on QoL and its predictors in CSU. A retrospective cohort study was done. The response to therapy was evaluated using urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) and urticaria control test (UCT); the impairment in QoL was assessed using dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire (CU-Q2oL).Forty-two patients were included. All scores improved from baseline to first month and remained stable at the third month of treatment (p < .001). The gender, age, and angioedema had no significant effect on QoL, but the complete responders (UAS7:0-1) had better improvement rates in all scores compared to others. The baseline UAS7, DLQI, and CU-Q2oL scores were lower at the baseline in complete responders (p = .0001).A rapid and continual improvement in QoL was obtained with omalizumab treatment. A better UAS7, UCT, DLQI, and CU-Q2oL score at the baseline might be a predictor of a better response to omalizumab and more improvement in QoL.Keywords:
Omalizumab
Abstract Background Approximately 50% of patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria ( CIU / CSU ) report hives and angioedema; some experience hives/angioedema only. Objective Assess omalizumab's effect on angioedema and quality of life (QoL) in subgroups with refractory CIU / CSU : those with and without angioedema. Methods Patients received omalizumab (75, 150 or 300 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks for 12/24 weeks. Angioedema and QoL were assessed [Urticaria Patient Daily Diary and Dermatology Quality of Life Index ( DLQI )]. Subgroups were based on the presence/absence of baseline angioedema 7 days prior to randomization. Results Patients with baseline angioedema randomized to omalizumab 300 mg had a greater reduction in mean weekly incidence of angioedema and mean number of days/week with angioedema vs. placebo at 12 and 24 weeks. A 3.3‐ to 4.5‐point greater mean reduction in DLQI score was achieved with omalizumab 300 mg treatment vs. placebo, above the minimal clinically important difference threshold. Results with lower doses vs. placebo were variable. Conclusion Compared with placebo, omalizumab 300 mg treatment over 12–24 weeks resulted in marked reduction in incidence and number of days/week with angioedema accompanied by clinically relevant improvement in QoL.
Omalizumab
Refractory (planetary science)
Hereditary Angioedema
Cite
Citations (51)
Treatment of chronic urticaria consists of antihistamines as the first-line treatment. For more severe symptoms, combinations can be necessary as well as dose augmentations. The recent guidelines suggest the possibility of using omalizumab in resistant cases, but this therapy is still investigational. We treated two patients with idiopathic recurrent angioedema and 12 patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) with omalizumab, who had not benefited from the recommended first-line, second-line and third-line treatments. To evaluate the efficacy of the omalizumab treatment, urticaria activity scores (UAS) and chronic urticaria quality of life (CU-Q2oL) scores were measured at baseline, and at the end of the first and sixth month of the therapy. The dosage and intervals of omalizumab therapy were determined according to the rules suggested for severe asthma treatment. CU-Q2oL scores and UAS displayed significant improvements in all 14 patients. None of the patients reported any adverse effect during the treatment until the submission of this data. Our results show that omalizumab apparently improves CU-Q2oL as well as UAS in treatment-resistant CSU in a real life setting.
Omalizumab
Hereditary Angioedema
Cite
Citations (72)
Aim : To examine the association between serum levels and effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), and explore patient-specific factors associated with omalizumab pharmacokinetics. Methods: Patients with CSU, who were refractory to high-dose antihistamines and who initiated treatment with omalizumab (300 mg every four weeks) were eligible for the study. Treatment was evaluated every 4 week during 12 weeks of treatment with urticaria activity score in the past week (UAS7) as primary outcome and urticaria control test (UCT), Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU QoL) and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) as secondary outcomes. Serum drug level of omalizumab was measured before (trough level) and at day seven (peak level) after each injection. Results: A total of 23 patients were included. After 12 weeks of treatment with omalizumab, an improvement of 16.8 UAS7 points (95% CI 10.8-22.8), p<0.001 was seen. The omalizumab trough and peak levels were 7.0-33.1 µg/mL and 11.4-54.0 µg/mL and reached a plateau (steady state) after 8-12 weeks of treatment. Among the patient-specific factors measured at baseline (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), angioedema, basophil histamine release (HR) test, blood basophils and eosinophils, and serum total IgE), BMI was the only significant predictor of omalizumab peak concentrations during the study (difference -2.75, p<0.05), whereas omalizumab trough concentrations were significantly associated with UAS7 scores (difference -0.82, p<0.001). The same was observed for UCT, DLQI, and CU QoL. Conclusion: In patients with CSU initiating treatment with omalizumab, a higher BMI predicts lower peak concentrations of omalizumab during treatment, whereas lower trough concentrations of omalizumab are associated with a poorer response on UAS7 and other patient reported outcomes.
Omalizumab
Trough level
Cite
Citations (0)
Omalizumab
Post-hoc analysis
Cite
Citations (2)
Omalizumab is a third-line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, the real-life data on the impact of omalizumab on CSU-related quality of life (QoL) remain scarce.To investigate the impact of omalizumab on QoL and its predictors in CSU. A retrospective cohort study was done. The response to therapy was evaluated using urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) and urticaria control test (UCT); the impairment in QoL was assessed using dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire (CU-Q2oL).Forty-two patients were included. All scores improved from baseline to first month and remained stable at the third month of treatment (p < .001). The gender, age, and angioedema had no significant effect on QoL, but the complete responders (UAS7:0-1) had better improvement rates in all scores compared to others. The baseline UAS7, DLQI, and CU-Q2oL scores were lower at the baseline in complete responders (p = .0001).A rapid and continual improvement in QoL was obtained with omalizumab treatment. A better UAS7, UCT, DLQI, and CU-Q2oL score at the baseline might be a predictor of a better response to omalizumab and more improvement in QoL.
Omalizumab
Cite
Citations (28)
BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria is a skin disease characterized by the appearance of itchy weals and/or angioedema for 6 or more weeks. Chronic urticaria is subdivided into chronic spontaneous urticaria, which occurs due to an unknown cause, and chronic inducible urticaria, which occurs as a result of exposure to various physical factors (water, cold, heat, pressure, mechanical irritation), can occur simultaneously or independently of each other. Omalizumab, anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is approved for the treatment of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and is the second choice in cases of resistance to antihistamine treatment. In patients with a combination of chronic spontaneous urticaria and chronic inducible urticaria, the effectiveness of treatment with omalizumab has been little studied.
AIM: compare the effectiveness of omalizumab treatment in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and patients with a combination of chronic spontaneous and chronic induced urticaria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under supervision there were 30 patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and combined chronic spontaneous and inducible urticaria (15 patients in each group). Evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment was carried out according to the results of the questionnaires DLQI (dermatological index of quality of life), CU-Q2oL (questionnaire for quality of life in chronic urticaria), UCT (urticaria control test), UAS (urticaria activity scale), HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and provocation tests in dynamics before and during treatment.
RESULTS: All patients received omalizumab 300 mg subcutaneously once a month for 6 to 12 months. After the first injection of omalizumab, we noted a decrease in the severity of urticaria, an increase in the level of disease control and quality of life when comparing parameters before and during treatment in more than 90% of patients. Improved performance remained at this level throughout all subsequent months of treatment.
CONCLUSION: Omalizumab is equally effective in patients with an isolated form of chronic spontaneous urticaria and in patients with a combined form of chronic spontaneous and inducible urticaria. The use of omalizumab allows you to control the symptoms of chronic spontaneous and inducible urticaria, even with prolonged use.
Omalizumab
Cite
Citations (0)
Chronic spontaneous/idiopathic urticaria (CSU/CIU) has substantial detrimental effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with an effect comparable to or worse than many other skin diseases.To assess the effect of omalizumab on CSU patients' HRQoL, measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in three phase III studies ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II and GLACIAL.A post hoc analysis examined changes in DLQI scores, distribution of patients across DLQI bands and the proportion reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following omalizumab vs. placebo.Omalizumab 300 mg significantly improved total DLQI scores vs. placebo, with a mean decrease from baseline to week 12 of -10.3 vs. -6.1 (P < 0.0001) in ASTERIA I, -10.2 vs. -6.1 (P = 0.0004) in ASTERIA II and -9.7 vs. -5.1 (P < 0.0001) in GLACIAL. A significant shift from high disease impact on life at baseline towards less impact at week 12 was seen with omalizumab 300 mg vs. placebo (P < 0.001; all studies). The proportion of patients where change in mean total DLQI score from baseline to week 12 reached an MCID of ≥4 was 74.1%, 76.0% and 77.2% in ASTERIA I, II and GLACIAL, respectively (P < 0.01; all studies).Maximum duration of omalizumab treatment was 24 weeks.This additional analysis assessed the impact of CSU and benefit of treatment with omalizumab by exploring different facets of DLQI data by treatment arm at multiple assessment points. The original aspects of analysis included applying the concept of the recently validated score for the MCID of the DLQI, changes in DLQI domain scores and in the distribution of subjects based on validated total DLQI score bands. It showed consistently that omalizumab provides significant and clinically relevant improvements in many aspects of HRQoL that are important to patients with CSU. These results contribute to a better understanding of the impact of CSU and its treatment on patients and can support clinical decision-making in routine medical practice.
Omalizumab
Cite
Citations (45)
BackgroundDisease burden is particularly high in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) patients with angioedema, and patients whose signs and symptoms are inadequately controlled by H1-antihistamines need new treatment options. Here we report an exploratory analysis, from the ligelizumab Phase 2b study, investigating angioedema occurrence in patients with CSU and describe the changes in angioedema following treatment with ligelizumab, omalizumab, or placebo.MethodsData from the ligelizumab Phase 2b core (ligelizumab 72 mg, 240 mg, omalizumab 300 mg and placebo) and extension study (ligelizumab 240 mg) were used. Changes in Weekly Angioedema Activity Score (AAS7), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) among each time point were analyzed for each treatment arm.ResultsFrom a total of 297 patients analyzed, 165 (55.6%) reported angioedema occurrence at baseline, with mean AAS7 ranging 30.6—42.2 across treatment arms. At Week 12 of the core study 87.5%, 84.6%, 75.0%, and 61.0% of patients were angioedema free for ligelizumab 72 mg, 240 mg, omalizumab 300 mg, and placebo arms, respectively. In CSU patients with angioedema at baseline, the largest change from baseline in AAS7 score was observed with ligelizumab 72 mg (−31.9) at week 16 in the core study. Patients with angioedema had a higher mean DLQI at baseline (14.9—16.1) vs. patients without angioedema (10.6—12.0). In patients with angioedema, low AAS7 was significantly associated with complete response on UAS7 (UAS7 = 0) and complete normalization of DLQI (DLQI 0—1).ConclusionIn the Phase 2b study, ligelizumab effectively reduced angioedema and urticaria symptoms, and improved health related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe CSU.Clinicaltrails.gov NCT numberNCT02477332; NCT02649218.
Omalizumab
Cite
Citations (4)
Most data on chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) originate from highly selected patient populations treated at specialized centres. Little is known about CSU patient characteristics and the burden of CSU in routine clinical practice. AWARE (A World-wide Antihistamine-Refractory chronic urticaria patient Evaluation) is an ongoing global study designed to assess chronic urticaria in the real-life setting.To describe the baseline characteristics of the first 1539 German AWARE patients with H1-antihistamine-refractory CSU.This prospective non-interventional study included patients (18-75 years) with a diagnosis of H1-antihistamine-refractory CSU for > 2 months. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics, comorbidities, and pharmacological treatments were recorded. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the dermatology life quality index (DLQI), chronic urticaria QoL questionnaire (CU-Q2 oL), and angioedema QoL questionnaire (AE-QoL, in cases of angioedema). Previous healthcare resource utilization and sick leave data were collected retrospectively.Between March and December 2014, 1539 patients were assessed in 256 sites across Germany. The percentage of females, mean age, and mean body mass index were 70%, 46.3 years, and 27 kg/m2 , respectively. The mean urticaria control test score was 7.9, one in two patients had angioedema, and the most frequent comorbidities were chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU; 24%), allergic rhinitis (18.2%), hypertension (18.1%), asthma (12%), and depression (9.5%). Overall, 57.6% of patients were receiving at least one pharmacological treatment including second-generation H1-antihistamines (46.3%), first-generation H1-antihistamines (9.1%), and corticosteroids (15.8%). The mean DLQI, total CU-Q2 oL, and total AE-QoL scores were 8.3, 36.2, and 46.8, respectively. CSU patients reported frequent use of healthcare resources, including emergency services (29.7%), general practitioners (71.9%), and additional allergists or dermatologists (50.7%).This study reveals that German H1-antihistamine-refractory CSU patients have high rates of uncontrolled disease, angioedema, and comorbid CIndU, are undertreated, have impaired QoL, and rely heavily on healthcare resources.
Refractory (planetary science)
Cite
Citations (106)
A Worldwide Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Urticaria (CU) patient Evaluation (AWARE) is a non-interventional, multicenter study including patients from Europe, Central and Latin America, Asia-Pacific, and the Middle East. AWARE describes real-world evidence for CU, including clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and the impact on quality of life.Over the 2-year study, therapy changes, angioedema occurrence, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded over 9 visits, including dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and 7-day urticaria activity score (UAS7). Data were stratified into subgroups: chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU), or CSU + CIndU.Out of 4838 patients analyzed, 9.9% were receiving no treatment for their CU symptoms at baseline, and 20.4% were receiving first-line non-sedating H1-antihistamine at approved doses. The predominant baseline therapy was up-dosed non-sedating H1-antihistamines (25.5%). By Visit 2, omalizumab was the overall most commonly used therapy (29.6%), increasing to 30.1% by the end of the study. Baseline DLQI scores for patients with CSU, CIndU and CSU + CIndU were 8.3, 7.6 and 9.1, respectively; scores decreased over the study for CSU and CSU + CIndU patients, but fluctuated for CIndU patients. Baseline angioedema occurrence was higher in CSU and CSU + CIndU patients, reported in 45.4% and 45.5% of patients, respectively, compared to 17.0% in CIndU patients. By the final visit, angioedema had decreased to 11.9% and 11.2% for CSU and CSU + CIndU, respectively, and 9.6% for CIndU.CU patients are undertreated at baseline; after entering the AWARE study, more patients received appropriate treatment. However, over two thirds are not escalated to third-line treatments.
Omalizumab
Refractory (planetary science)
Cite
Citations (46)