Effects of residence time on life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from dairy manure
11
Citation
58
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Carbon Footprint
Biogas
Cite
Citations (1)
Abstract This article is a review of the scientific literature published in 2019 on topics relating to bioenergy from biofuel residues and waste. This literature review is divided into the following sections: Feedstocks, Biodiesel, Bioethanol, Hydrogen, Biohydrogen, Biofuel Residues, Microalgae, and Lignocelluloses.
Cite
Citations (7)
Carbon neutrality
Aviation biofuel
Cite
Citations (15)
Sustainable Production
Cite
Citations (38)
A biorefinery transforms biomass into usable products (fuel, electricity, chemicals) and resolves waste management and greenhouse gases emissions issues. The approach of life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to quantify the environmental impacts of biorefinery system and products across life cycle stages. Life cycle assessment is widely recognized as one of the most important techniques for assessing environmental issues in biomass supply chains, particularly at the processing stage, as well as for assisting in the prioritizing of certain biobased products and biorefinery alternatives. This book chapter discusses about case study of life cycle impacts of mango peel waste biorefinery with three processes. The GWP was found to be 3,230,000 kg CO2 eq for PEP. From LCA result, we concluded that it is always preferable to extract as many products as possible so that individual attribution of the product is as simple as achievable.
Cite
Citations (1)
Colombia has recently started the production of Biodiesel from palm oil and Bioethanol from sugarcane. The bioethanol in Colombia replaces 8% of the national consumption of fuel for transportation and it represents nearly 263.340 gallons per day. A life-cycle energy and environmental assessment was conducted for bioethanol production from cassava in Colombia. The scope covered all stages in the life cycle of bioethanol. In the Life Cycle Assessment the impact assessment method used is IPCC2007 GWP100a, for global warming. In all stages of the life cycle there are important impacts for the use the bioethanol in a car. At other stages, ethanol production is important for the product's environmental impact. The carbon footprint of the bioethanol from cassava is 65gCO2e/MJ. The energy conversion efficiency of fuel ethanol is 1.34.
Carbon Footprint
Energy crop
Cite
Citations (7)
This chapter contains sections titled: Background Bioethanol Feedstocks Biodiesel Feedstocks Ethanol Production Thin Stillage Characterization Cassava-Based Ethanol Production Cellulose-Based Ethanol Production Bioenergy Recovery from Crude Glycerin References
Stillage
Cellulosic ethanol
Cite
Citations (18)
A review of publications encompassing bioenergy from residues of biofuel industries is presented here. Articles are within two years of 2012 and incorporate the topics of advanced biofuels and bioproducts for current and future biorefineries.
Bioproducts
Aviation biofuel
Cite
Citations (2)
The concerns about increasing greenhouse gas emissions and climate change have mobilized the world towards using new materials and technologies to decarbonize the global economy. In line with this, the utilization of diverse forms of bioenergy is expected to expand in various economic sectors due to their potential to solve environmental concerns. More specifically, the carbon contained in bioenergy is mainly from biogenic carbon dioxide; thus, bioenergy utilization contributes much less to environmental impacts than fossil energy. Despite the renewability of bioenergy sources, their production is dependent on immense amounts of construction materials, chemicals, and, most importantly, energy resources. Since the production and use of the above items are also responsible for environmental problems and challenges, the sustainability of bioenergy product systems might also be questioned. Life cycle assessment is a powerful tool to quantify the environmental sustainability of various products, including bioenergy production. It also can identify the sources and causes of the environmental impacts of bioenergy product systems. Despite the significant advantages of life cycle assessment in assessing the environmental sustainability of bioenergy product systems, there are still limitations and disadvantages to using this method. Different assumptions, various inventory data, different methods of impact assessment, and many other sources of uncertainty may give rise to wide ranges of final results. These issues can negatively affect the accuracy and reliability of bioenergy product systems' life cycle assessment results, leading to incorrect decisions and policies. In light of the above, this study critically discusses the pros and cons of life cycle assessment in bioenergy product systems, identifying the gaps and sources of uncertainty. Finally, frameworks and procedures to improve the applicability and validity of life cycle assessment are suggested to shed light on future research directions.
Cite
Citations (38)
Sponsored by the Bioenergy and Biofuel Task Committee of the Environmental Council of the Environmental and Water Resources Institute of ASCE.
Cite
Citations (23)