[Relationship between the dissected lymph node number and the prognosis in D(2) gastrectomy for gastric cancer].
1
Citation
0
Reference
20
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
To examine the relationship between the dissected lymph-node number and the prognosis in D(2) gastrectomy for gastric cancer.From January 1996 to January 2005, 457 patients with primary gastric cancer undergone gastrectomy with different extent of lymphadenectomy in our hospital were followed-up in term of prognostic benefit.In lymph-node metastasis group, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 82.4%, 49.0%, 33.4% with dissection of >20 nodes and 71.5%, 49.7%, 40.1% with dissection of 16-20 nodes. In the group without lymph-node metastasis, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 98.2%, 92.7%, 84.7% with dissection of >20 nodes and 94.0%, 89.7%, 81.4% with dissection of 16-20 nodes. Whether or not it had lymph-node metastasis, the survival curve failed to show any significant difference with regard to the extent of lymph node dissection.As to lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer, it is enough to excise the lymph node between 16 and 20. The number of excised lymph node should not be overemphasized unless it is metastasized.Keywords:
Lymphadenectomy
Cite
Surgical oncology
Axillary Dissection
Axilla
Cite
Citations (2)
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is currently the most accurate staging modality for lymph node metastases in prostate adenocarcinoma. There is no consensus on the optimal sampling method of PLND specimens among pathologists. This study analyzed the effectiveness of the submission of entire adipose tissue in 451 cases and its impact on total lymph node yield and detection of positive lymph nodes. The sizes of metastatic foci and positive lymph nodes in 83 cases were also studied. Submission of entire adipose tissue increased the lymph node yield and positive lymph node detection by 36.7 % and 1.99 %, respectively. Three cases had positive lymph nodes exclusively in adipose tissue. Of the patients examined, 68% had the largest positive lymph node, <1 cm. In conclusion, it was noted that metastases from prostate cancer were frequently small and seen within small lymph nodes. Submission of entire adipose tissue substantially increased the lymph node yield, but its impact on the detection of additional positive lymph nodes was low. Submission of the entire adipose tissue may be considered as an option in patients with high-risk factors for lymph node metastases.
Cite
Citations (11)
Abstract Background and Aim: Lymph node metastasis is a major prognostic factor for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). However, prognostic significance of extent of node dissection, lymph node ratio (LNR), and number and location of positive nodes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether node status, LNR, or number or location of positive nodes are independent factors for staging in PHC and to determine the minimum requirements for node examination. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 1116 resected PHCs from 1998 to 2008. The correlation between nodal status and survival was analyzed retrospectively. Results: Lymph node metastasis occurred in 43.4% patients and was an independent predictor for overall survival and cancer‐specific survival. No survival benefit was observed for an increasing number of node retrieval in node‐positive patients. However, in node‐negative patients, ≥13 node dissection was of more survival benefit than 3 ≤ total lymph node count (TLNC) ≤ 12 and TLNC < 3 (5‐year overall survival: 52.8% vs 39.7% vs 26.3%, P = 0.001; 5‐year cancer‐specific survival: 60.6% vs 46.3% vs 30.0%, P = 0.001). No difference in survival between patients with regional and distant node involvement was found. Survival for patients with greater than three positive nodes was significantly worse than that for those with three or less (relative ratio: 1.466, P = 0.001). And patients with LNR > 0.27 also had unfavorable prognosis (relative ratio: 1.376, P = 0.001). Conclusions: We determined that to adequately assess nodal status of this life‐threatening disease, 13 or more nodes retrieval should be considered. Number of positive nodes and LNR rather than location of metastatic nodes may be defined as parameters for staging of PHC.
Lymphadenectomy
Cite
Citations (50)
Lymphadenectomy
Micrometastasis
Cite
Citations (18)
To investigate the rule of lymph-node metastasis in gastric cardia cancer and the rational extent of lymph node dissection.Clinicopathological data of 77 patients with gastric cardia cancer were reviewed and the relationship between extent of lymph-node dissection and prognosis was analyzed retrospectively.(1) The lymph node metastasis rates were 64.9% for N(1), 14.3% for N(2) and 10.4% for N(3). (2) No lymph node metastasis was detected in T(1) stage tumor and maximum diameter of less than 2.0 cm. The lymph node metastasis rates were 20% for T(2), 68.2% for T(3) and 82.8% for T(4) respectively. (3) Lymph node No.1, 3, 2 were often involved in the metastasis of lymph node group 1, and No.7, 8, 10, 9 in Group 2. In lymph node group 3, lymph node metastasis rates were 6.5% for No.5, 1.3% for No.6, 1.3% for No.16 and 2.6% for No.107-110. (4) The five-year survival rates were 36.5% for D(3), 31.3% for D(2), and 22.7% for D(1) lymphadenectomy respectively. The survival rates of patients undergone D(2) and D(3) lymphadenectomy were significantly higher than that undergone D(1) dissection (P<0.05).D(2) or more than D(2) lymphadenectomy associated with enlargement of esophageal hiatus via laparotomy, lower partial esophagectomy and total gastrectomy is able to achieve surgical resectability and improve the survival rate of gastric cardia cancer patients.
Lymphadenectomy
Esophagectomy
Cite
Citations (0)
Background For the patients with node-negative gastric cancer, the 7th edition classification does not define the minimum number of lymph nodes necessary. We aimed to explore the prognostic significance of examined lymph nodes and determine how many nodes must be examined. Methodology/Principal Findings 435 patients underwent D2 gastrectomy with node-negative gastric cancer between December 1992 and December 2006 were obtained. Patients were classified into 4 groups by the number of negative LNs examined during surgery (1-6LNs, 7-10 LNs, 11-15 LNs, and > = 16 LNs). Stratified and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between survival and the number of negative LNs. Survival was significantly better in the > = 16 LNs, compared with the 1-5 LNs, 6-10 LNs and 11-15 LNs group in T2-4 patients; Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size, depth of invasion, 7th UICC stage and the number of examined nodes are strongly independent predictors of survival. Conclusions This study first demonstrates that patients with lymph node-negative gastric cancer underwent D2 dissection should have at least 16 LNs examined, especially in advanced gastric cancer. These results are a reasonable supplement to our previous tumor-ratio-metastasis staging system and a stratification criterion in clinical pratice.
Cite
Citations (52)
A discrepancy exists between the 7th edition guidelines of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the 3rd edition Japanese treatment guidelines in terms of the classification of No. 12a lymph nodes as regional or distant lymph nodes in D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. The scope definition of No. 12a lymph nodes has yet to be fully elucidated. The present study aimed to assess the appropriateness of reclassifying No. 12a lymph node metastasis as distant metastasis according to the survival rate outcome, and to provide a clear and practical definition of the No. 12a group lymph nodes of gastric cancer. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with gastric cancer who underwent standard or greater lymphadenectomy between January 2000 and December 2009 to find an association between No. 12a node metastasis and survival outcome. The present study first presented a clear and practical scope definition of the No. 12a group lymph nodes of gastric cancer, according to our clinical experiences and practices (Table I and Fig. 1). The survival outcome of patients with gastric cancer and No. 12a lymph node metastasis was poorer compared with that of patients with no No. 12a lymph node metastasis (P=0.0003). The results were similar in stage III patients with gastric cancer (P<0.0001). However, the survival outcome of patients was similar with or without No. 12a lymph node metastasis in stage IV gastric cancer (P=0.1968). Cox regression analysis revealed that the AJCC stage was independently associated with an unfavorable cumulative survival rate. Logistic regression analysis revealed that tumor location, AJCC stage, intravascular cancer emboli and nerve invasion were associated with No. 12a lymph node metastasis. In conclusion, the data in the present study suggested that No. 12a lymph node metastasis is associated with distant metastasis, and therefore they concur with the 7th edition AJCC gastric cancer guidelines, which appear to be correct in terms of considering No. 12a lymph node metastasis as distant metastasis.
Lymphadenectomy
Cite
Citations (5)
Mediastinal lymph node
Cite
Citations (69)
The standard strategy for lymph node dissection in advanced gastric cancer patients is defined as D2 lymph node dissection based on the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer and Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2010 edited by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Lymph nodes that should be dissected for D2 are also defined according to whether the surgical method is total gastrectomy or distal gastrectomy. The locations of those lymph nodes are anatomically described in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer: No. 1 to 12. The efficacy of prophylactic extended lymph node dissection in the paraaortic area (No. 16) was not confirmed in a randomized clinical trial (JCOG9501). Splenectomy aiming for complete lymph node dissection at the splenic hilum is under evaluation in a clinical trial (JCOG0110). Optional dissection of the lower mediastinal lymph nodes (No. 110, 111) is recommended for junctional tumors, although the dissection of lymph nodes at the root of the supramesenteric vein (No. 14v) and behind the pancreas (No. 13) remains controversial.
Paraaortic lymph nodes
Cite
Citations (2)