Protein Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Advanced Thyroid Cancer: Ethical Challenges and Potential Solutions
8
Citation
18
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) have emerged as highly promising therapies in progressive metastatic radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer and in medullary thyroid cancer; two were recently approved in the USA for use in medullary thyroid cancer (vandetanib, cabozantinib), and another for use in progressive metastatic radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (sorafenib). Although more than 90% of thyroid cancer patients fare well in response to conventional treatment, PKI therapy has the potential to provide benefit. Nonetheless, PKIs produce numerous side effects, may worsen quality of life, may hasten mortality (by 1–2%), require discerning clinical acumen, are not yet proven to improve thyroid cancer survival and are very costly. This raises questions about who should prescribe PKIs, and about whether their use in thyroid cancer is truly beneficent and ethically justified. Restraint should be exercised in their use in thyroid cancer, with potential risks and benefits carefully weighed and solutions devised to help ameliorate many of the problems associated with their use.Keywords:
Vandetanib
Cabozantinib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Background Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare form of cancer that affects patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and survival. Cabozantinib (Cometriq ® ; Ipsen, Paris, France) and vandetanib (Caprelsa ® ; Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA) are currently the treatment modality of choice for treating unresectable progressive and symptomatic MTC. Objectives (1) To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of cabozantinib and vandetanib. (2) To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib and vandetanib versus each other and best supportive care. (3) To identify key areas for primary research. (4) To estimate the overall cost of these treatments in England. Data sources Peer-reviewed publications (searched from inception to November 2016), European Public Assessment Reports and manufacturers’ submissions. Review methods A systematic review [including a network meta-analysis (NMA)] was conducted to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of cabozantinib and vandetanib. The economic analysis included a review of existing analyses and the development of a de novo model. Results The systematic review identified two placebo-controlled trials. The Efficacy of XL184 (Cabozantinib) in Advanced Medullary Thyroid Cancer (EXAM) trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in patients with unresectable locally advanced, metastatic and progressive MTC. The ZETA trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of vandetanib in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic MTC. Both drugs significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) more than the placebo ( p < 0.001). The NMA suggested that, within the symptomatic and progressive MTC population, the effects on PFS were similar (vandetanib vs. cabozantinib: hazard ratio 1.14, 95% credible interval 0.41 to 3.09). Neither trial demonstrated a significant overall survival benefit for cabozantinib or vandetanib versus placebo, although data from ZETA were subject to potential confounding. Both cabozantinib and vandetanib demonstrated significantly better objective response rates and calcitonin (CTN) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) response rates than placebo. Both cabozantinib and vandetanib produced frequent adverse events, often leading to dose interruption or reduction. The assessment group model indicates that, within the EU-label population (symptomatic and progressive MTC), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for cabozantinib and vandetanib are > £138,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Within the restricted EU-label population (symptomatic and progressive MTC with CEA/CTN doubling times of ≤ 24 months), the ICER for vandetanib is expected to be > £66,000 per QALY gained. The maximum annual budget impact within the symptomatic and progressive population is estimated to be ≈£2.35M for cabozantinib and ≈£5.53M for vandetanib. The costs of vandetanib in the restricted EU-label population are expected to be lower. Limitations The intention-to-treat populations of the EXAM and ZETA trials are notably different. The analyses of ZETA subgroups may be subject to confounding as a result of differences in baseline characteristics and open-label vandetanib use. Attempts to statistically adjust for treatment switching were unsuccessful. No HRQoL evidence was identified for the MTC population. Conclusions The identified trials suggest that cabozantinib and vandetanib improve PFS more than the placebo; however, significant OS benefits were not demonstrated. The economic analyses indicate that within the EU-label population, the ICERs for cabozantinib and vandetanib are > £138,000 per QALY gained. Within the restricted EU-label population, the ICER for vandetanib is expected to be > £66,000 per QALY gained. Future research priorities (1) Primary research assessing the long-term effectiveness of cabozantinib and vandetanib within relevant subgroups. (2) Reanalyses of the ZETA trial to investigate the impact of adjusting for open-label vandetanib use using appropriate statistical methods. (3) Studies assessing the impact of MTC on HRQoL. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016050403. Funding The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Vandetanib
Cabozantinib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Cite
Citations (32)
Sorafenib and lenvatinib can be effective for advanced differentiated thyroid cancer, and vandetanib and cabozantinib can be effective options for advanced medullary thyroid cancer. When first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors fail for patients, evidence supports salvage therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer but is less compelling for medullary thyroid cancer.
Lenvatinib
Cabozantinib
Vandetanib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Salvage therapy
Cite
Citations (0)
This manuscript investigates cabozantinib, vandetanib, pralsetinib, and selpercatinib, four tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which are used to treat advanced and/or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Data on efficacy and safety are presented with the main focus on treatment-related hypertension, a well-known adverse effect (AE) of these TKIs. Taken together, TKI-induced hypertension is rarely a dose-limiting side effect. However, with increasing survival times of patients under treatment, hypertension-associated complications can be expected to be on the rise without proper medication.
Vandetanib
Cabozantinib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Cite
Citations (20)
Summary Established systemic treatment options for advanced thyroid cancer include the multityrosine kinase inhibitors lenvatinib and sorafenib for radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and vandetanib and cabozantinib for medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Recently, the COSMIC-311 study resulted in approval of cabozantinib for DTC with progression upon lenvatinib and/or sorafenib; thus, for the first time a specific second-line therapy has been defined for these patients. In addition, the therapeutic landscape of thyroid cancer has been expanded by targeted therapies based on molecular tumor profiles. Selective RET inhibitors such as selpercatinib and pralsetinib show high activity in DTC with RET fusions and MTC with RET mutations, respectively. Further targeted treatment options include NTRK inhibitors for thyroid cancers with NTRK fusions and BRAF-targeted therapy for BRAF V600E-mutated (anaplastic) thyroid cancer.
Lenvatinib
Cabozantinib
Vandetanib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Anaplastic thyroid cancer
Targeted Therapy
Cite
Citations (0)
Protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) have emerged as highly promising therapies in progressive metastatic radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer and in medullary thyroid cancer; two were recently approved in the USA for use in medullary thyroid cancer (vandetanib, cabozantinib), and another for use in progressive metastatic radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (sorafenib). Although more than 90% of thyroid cancer patients fare well in response to conventional treatment, PKI therapy has the potential to provide benefit. Nonetheless, PKIs produce numerous side effects, may worsen quality of life, may hasten mortality (by 1–2%), require discerning clinical acumen, are not yet proven to improve thyroid cancer survival and are very costly. This raises questions about who should prescribe PKIs, and about whether their use in thyroid cancer is truly beneficent and ethically justified. Restraint should be exercised in their use in thyroid cancer, with potential risks and benefits carefully weighed and solutions devised to help ameliorate many of the problems associated with their use.
Vandetanib
Cabozantinib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Cite
Citations (8)
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for medullary thyroid cancer. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is generally ineffective in patients with progressive, inoperable, advanced-stage or metastatic tumours. Vandetanib is also authorised in this setting, but it has more harms than benefits. Cabozantinib, like vandetanib, inhibits several tyrosine kinases involved in angiogenesis. Cabozantinib has been authorised in the European Union for use in this setting. In a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 330 patients, adding cabozantinib to tailored symptomatic treatment did not prolong survival or improve symptoms, despite a favourable effect on tumour imaging and certain laboratory parameters. On the contrary, cabozantinib appeared to undermine quality of life and aggravate diarrhoea. The known adverse effects of cabozantinib are numerous and often severe: diarrhoea, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, venous and arterial thrombosis, bleeding and fistulae. Deaths unrelated to tumour progression were more frequent with cabozantinib than with placebo. Cabozantinib carries a risk of multiple pharmacokinetic interactions by interfering with cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein. In animals, cabozantinib is teratogenic and also impairs male and female fertility. Contraception is required for women, and also for the partners of treated men, who must use condoms. These precautions must be maintained for at least 4 months after the end of treatment. In practice, in mid-2015, cabozantinib, like vandetanib, has an unfavourable harm-benefit balance in medullary thyroid cancer. The focus should remain on tailored symptomatic care.
Cabozantinib
Vandetanib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Axitinib
Cite
Citations (1)
Abstract: Although patients with thyroid cancer generally fare well, there is a subset for which this is not necessarily true. Progress in understanding the molecular aberrations in thyroid cancer has led to a change in the management of these cases. Since 2011, four multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for thyroid cancer – cabozantinib and vandetanib for medullary thyroid cancer and sorafenib and lenvatinib for differentiated thyroid cancer. This change in the treatment landscape has raised challenges for practitioners who may not be familiar with the use of MKIs or with the treatment and natural history of advanced thyroid cancer in general. This article reviews the epidemiology, molecular drivers, and initial treatment of patients with thyroid cancer and offers practical guidance to assist with the determination of when to appropriately start an MKI. As an example, cabozantinib and its efficacy are discussed in detail. Close monitoring is required for all patients on targeted agents to assess for adverse effects and response to therapy. An approach to managing drug-related adverse events is detailed. Since these drugs are not curative and have not yet proven to prolong overall survival, it is critical to weigh the risks and benefits of treatment at every visit. The potential value of changing to a different agent following failure of an MKI is also addressed. Keywords: chemotherapy, adverse event, targeted therapy, kinase inhibitor, VEGF, RET
Cabozantinib
Lenvatinib
Vandetanib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Cite
Citations (37)
6078 Background: Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) accounts for 1 to 2% of thyroid cancers in the United States; RET alterations occur in >95% of hereditary and 50% of sporadic forms. Up to 80% of patients with sporadic MTC have somatic M918T RET mutations, which is associated with poor prognosis (1). The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) cabozantinib and vandetanib are approved to treat patients with MTC regardless of RET status; however, retrospective analyses have suggested that there may be greater benefit in patients with M918T mutations (1,2). Newly approved therapies selpercatinib and pralsetinib, developed for patients with RET mutations, have demonstrated higher response rates than previous first line therapies. In this analysis, we examine the differences in overall response rate (ORR) between patients with MTC with RET M918T non- RET M918T mutations. Methods: An analysis of ORR in patients with MTC with RET M918T mutations with non-M918T mutations was conducted using the efficacy populations used to support the approvals of pralsetinib and selpercatinib using the following groups: Patients who received prior cabozantinib or vandetanib (referred to as “previously treated”). Patients with no prior cabozantinib or vandetanib (“TKI naïve”). All patients regardless of prior therapy. Results: Exploratory analysis of ORR of pooled population of Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib in patients with MTC with RET M918T mutations and non-M918T mutations. 1 Prior vandetanib or cabozantinib. 2 No prior vandetanib or cabozantinib. Two groups of patients were analyzed ( RET M918T mutation and RET non-M918T mutation), with subgroups with respect to prior treatment. Among all patients regardless of prior therapy, the ORR was similar between M918T non-M918T groups. Among previously treated patients, the ORR was lower in the M918T group vs. the non-M918T group, while in the TKI naïve group the ORR was higher in the M918T groups vs the non-M918T group although the 95% CIs overlap in both comparisons. Conclusions: There were no major differences in ORR among mutational subtypes in patients with MTC treated with RET inhibitors, regardless of prior therapy. ORR was similar between patients with M918T and non-M918T mutations. Additional experience in ongoing clinical studies may provide additional data regarding responses across specific mutation types. References: 1.Sherman SI et al “Correlative analyses of RET and RAS mutations in a phase 3 trial of cabozantinib...” Cancer. 2016;122(24):3856-3864. 2.Wells SA Jr et al “Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer...” J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(2):134-41.[Table: see text]
Vandetanib
Cabozantinib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Cite
Citations (0)
Background: Management of patients with advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) remains a therapeutic challenge. The multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) vandetanib and cabozantinib have been approved for the treatment of progressive MTC based on prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in phase 3 clinical trials. Patients and Methods: To evaluate clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, efficacy, and treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of vandetanib and cabozantinib in MTC patients outside clinical trials at four German tertiary care centers. Forty-eight patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2018 were included. PFS and overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 46 years (15-80 years); a germ line RET (rearranged during transfection) mutation was known in 6 (13%) patients. Thirty-two (67%) patients showed progressive disease before TKI initiation. Forty-seven (98%) patients were treated with vandetanib and 23 (48%) patients with cabozantinib. Vandetanib was first-line treatment in 41 (85%) patients and cabozantinib in 7 (15%) patients. Partial response was the best response in 12 (26%) patients treated with vandetanib and in 5 (22%) patients treated with cabozantinib. Sixteen (34%) patients treated with vandetanib and 3 (13%) patients treated with cabozantinib had stable disease ≥24 weeks. The median PFS for vandetanib and cabozantinib was 17 months [95% confidence interval, CI, 9.3-24.6 months] and 4 months [CI 3.1-4.9 months], respectively. The 6- and 12-month survival rates were 98% and 86% for vandetanib and 78% and 70% for cabozantinib, respectively. The median OS for vandetanib and cabozantinib was 53 months [CI 43.7-62.3 months] and 24 months [CI 5.9-42.1 months], respectively. In vandetanib-treated patients, the PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients aged ≤60 years at TKI initiation and in patients with ≥5 TEAEs. Additionally, the PFS was longer in the absence of bone metastases. In cabozantinib-treated patients, the PFS was significantly longer in patients experiencing TEAEs and in patients aged ≤60 years, and the OS was significantly longer in patients who had TEAEs and in patients with ≥5 TEAEs. Conclusions: Vandetanib and cabozantinib are effective treatment options in the majority of MTC patients. We hypothesize that the poorer prognosis of cabozantinib-treated patients in our retrospective analysis is most likely due to its use as second-line treatment after treatment failure on vandetanib. However, different degrees of efficacy of the two drugs are possible.
Vandetanib
Cabozantinib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Cite
Citations (48)
The treatment of thyroid cancer is evolving. The molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis for many thyroid cancers have been investigated, and have yielded targets for potential therapies. These targets include VEGFR in the treatment of all thyroid cancers, BRAF in the treatment of papillary thyroid cancer, and RET in the treatment of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Many promising drugs that target one or more of these proteins are currently being evaluated, including sorafenib and sunitinib, both of which are still under development for the treatment of thyroid cancer but which have been approved for use in other malignancies. In addition, compounds such as vandetanib (AstraZeneca plc) and XL-184 (Bristol-Myers Squibb Co/Exelixis Inc) have demonstrated activity in early-phase clinical trials of MTC and are being tested further in randomized trials.
Vandetanib
Medullary Thyroid Cancer
Investigational Drugs
Follicular thyroid cancer
Targeted Therapy
Cite
Citations (6)