Child Behavior Checklist
89
Citation
5
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Abstract The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), which is part of the broader Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) tools, was first published in 1983 and has undergone several revisions since then. The CBCL assesses behavioral and emotional problems as well as social competencies of children and adolescents, ages 1½–19 years, as reported by their parents and/or other caregivers. Caregivers rate the presence of 99 behaviors in very young children (CBCL/1½–5/LDS) or 118 behaviors in older children and teens (CBCL/6–18) during the past 6 months. Twenty additional items assess school performance, social relationships, and activities.Keywords:
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
본 연구에서는 내재화 장애 청소년과 외현화 장애 청소년의 문제행동에 대한 부모 보고와 청소년 보고가 어떤 양상으로 나타나는 지 알아보고자 하였다. 내재화 장애가 있는 청소년 29명(내재화 장애 집단)과 외현화 장애가 있는 청소년 37명(외현화 장애 집단)에게 한국판 청소년 자기행동 평가 척도(Korean Youth Self-Report: K-YSR)를 실시하였고, 부모 66명에게는 한국판 아동 청소년 행동평가 척도(Korean Child Behavior Checklist: K-CBCL)를 실시하였다. 자료분석을 위해 두 집단의 K-CBCL과 K-YSR 11개 증상척도에 대해 t검증 하였고, 진단구분에 영향을 미치는 척도들을 알아보기 위해 판별분석하였다. 아울러 내재화 장애 집단과 외현화 장애 집단 각각에서 문제행동에 대한 부모-청소년 보고 간의 일치도를 알아보기 위해 적률상관 분석을 하였다. 또한 청소년의 문제행동에 대한 부모 보고와 청소년 보고의 상대적 심각도가 청소년의 장애 유형(즉 내재화 장애와 외현화 장애)과 유관성이 있는 지 알아보기 위해 χ2 검증하였다. 그 결과, 비행, 내재화 문제 및 외현화 문제 증상척도는 부모 보고와 청소년 보고 둘 다에서 내재화 장애 집단과 외현화 장애 집단의 문제행동을 잘 반영해주고 있었다. 청소년의 문제행동에 대한 부모와 청소년 보고 간의 일치도는 낮았다. 청소년의 장애 유형과 부모와 청소년의 문제행동 보고에서의 상대적 심각도는 유의한 관련성이 없었다. 이러한 결과는 본 연구대상의 인구통계학적 및 임상적 특징의 영향일 수도 있다. 그러나 청소년의 문제행동에 대한 정보제공자간의 일치여부나 문제행동의 상대적 심각도를 평가하는 것을 넘어서서, 부모-청소년 간의 상호작용 혹은 심각도에 대한 정보제공자의 지각을 고려해 볼 필요가 있음을 시사한다. 본 연구의 제한점과 향후 연구방향이 논의되었다.
CBCL
Externalization
Child Behavior Checklist
Internalization
Adolescent Development
Cite
Citations (4)
Disorders of self-regulatory behavior are common reasons for referral to child and adolescent clinicians. Here, the authors sought to compare 2 methods of empirically based assessment of children with problems in self-regulatory behavior. Using parental reports on 2,028 children (53% boys) from a U.S. national probability sample of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; T. M. Achenbach & L. A. Rescorla, 2001), the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was applied to compare scores on the Posttraumatic Stress Problems Scale (PTSP) of the CBCL with the CBCL Dysregulation Profile (DP), identified using latent class analysis of the Attention Problems, Aggressive Behavior, and Anxious/Depressed scales of the CBCL. The CBCL-PTSP score demonstrated an area under the curve of between .88 and .91 for predicting membership in the CBCL-DP profile for boys and for girls. These findings suggest that the CBCL-PTSP, which others have shown does not uniquely identify children who have been traumatized, does identify the same profile of behavior as the CBCL-DP. Therefore, the authors recommend renaming the CBCL-PTSP the Dysregulation Short Scale and provide some guidelines for the use of the CBCL-DP scale and the CBCL-PTSP in clinical practice.
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
Cite
Citations (77)
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
Cite
Citations (94)
Objective This study examined the measurement invariance of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Youth Self-Report (YSR) DSM-oriented scales between extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and normal birth weight (NBW) youth. Methods The sample included 158 ELBW survivors and 145 matched, NBW controls at 8 and 12–16 years of age. Results Strict invariance was established at 8 years for parent-reported CBCL attention-deficit hyperactivity, conduct, and oppositional defiant scales, though invariance could not be established for affective problems at 8 or 12–16 years. Strict invariance was observed between 12–16-year-old ELBW and NBW groups on attention-deficit hyperactivity, anxiety, and oppositional defiant CBCL and YSR scales. Invariance could not be established for youth-reported conduct problems. Conclusions While the majority of CBCL/YSR DSM-oriented subscales assess the same concepts in both ELBW and NBW children and adolescents across parent and youth reports, this may not be the case for affective and conduct problems.
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
Measurement Invariance
Cite
Citations (6)
Abstract The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), which is part of the broader Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) tools, was first published in 1983 and has undergone several revisions since then. The CBCL assesses behavioral and emotional problems as well as social competencies of children and adolescents, ages 1½–19 years, as reported by their parents and/or other caregivers. Caregivers rate the presence of 99 behaviors in very young children (CBCL/1½–5/LDS) or 118 behaviors in older children and teens (CBCL/6–18) during the past 6 months. Twenty additional items assess school performance, social relationships, and activities.
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
Cite
Citations (89)
Synopsis Behavioural/emotional problems were assessed at least nine years after surgical correction for congenital heart disease (ConHD) in childhood. Parents of 144 10–15-year-old ConHD-children completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and 179, 11–17-year-old, ConHD-adolescents completed the Youth Self-Report (YSR). On the CBCL and YSR ConHD-children and adolescents obtained significantly higher problem scores than same-aged peers from normative reference groups. No significant differences were found between problem scores for different cardiac diagnostic groups. A negative correlation was found between CBCL total problem scores and IQ-scores of ConHD-children; for YSR total problem scores no such relationship was found.
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
Cite
Citations (149)
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
Child psychopathology
Behavior problem
Cite
Citations (37)
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
Cite
Citations (31)
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
Foster parents
Cite
Citations (18)
Abstract This study examines problem behavior over time in 59 boys with fragile X syndrome (FXS), aged 4–12 years, using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Approximately 49% of the boys scored within the borderline or clinical range on total problem behavior, while 56–57% scored in the borderline or clinical range on the attention and thought problems subscales, and 26% scored in this range on the social problems subscale. With a mean of 2.5 assessments per child, behavior problems were stable during the 3‐year period of study. Total problem behavior was higher for children who displayed autistic behavior, were rated as low in adaptability, had mothers with higher maternal education levels, and were on medication. Mothers with more education also rated their children as having more attention, thought, and total problems. Children taking medication differed from boys who were not taking medication on social problems, but not on attention and thought problems. Low adaptability and more autistic characteristics predicted thought problems. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
CBCL
Child Behavior Checklist
Behavior problem
Adaptability
Fragile X Syndrome
Cite
Citations (150)