Automated detection-in-depth in industrial control systems

Legacy industrial control systems (ICSs) are not designed to be exposed to the Internet and linking them to corporate networks has introduced a large number of cyber security vulnerabilities. Due to the distributed nature of ICS devices, a detection-in-depth strategy is required to simultaneously monitor the behaviour of multiple sources of ICS data. While a detection-in-depth method leads to detecting attacks, like flooding attacks in earlier phases before the attacker can reach the end target, most research papers have focused on anomaly detection based on a single source of ICS data. Here, we present a detection-in-depth method for an ICS network. The new method is called automated flooding attack detection (AFAD) which consists of three stages: data acquisition, pre-processing, and a flooding anomaly detector. Data acquisition includes data collection from different sources like programmable logic controller (PLC) logs and network traffic. We then generate NetFlow data to provide light-weight anomaly detection in ICS networks. NetFlow-based analysis has been used as a scalable method for anomaly detection in high-speed networks. It only analyses packet headers, and it is an efficient method for detecting flooding attacks like denial of service attacks, and its performance is not affected by encrypted data. However, it has not been sufficiently studied in industrial control systems. Besides NetFlow data, ICS device logs are a rich source of information that can be used to detect abnormal behaviour. Both NetFlow traffic and log data are processed in our pre-processing stage. The third stage of AFAD is anomaly detection which consists of two parallel machine learning analysis methods, which respectively analyse the behaviours of device logs and NetFlow records. Due to the lack of enough labelled training datasets in most environments, an unsupervised predictor and an unsupervised clustering method are respectively used in the anomaly detection stage. We validated our approach using traffic captured in a factory automation dataset, Modbus dataset, and SWAT dataset. These datasets contain physical and network level normal and abnormal data. The performance of AFAD was compared with single-layer anomaly detection and with other studies. Results showed the high precision of AFAD in detecting flooding attacks.