Phytoplankton, nutrients, and turbidity in the Chesapeake, Delaware, and Hudson estuaries
1988
Estuaries receive continuous inputs of nutrients from their freshwater sources, but the fate of the inputs is poorly known. In order to document nutrient removal from the water column by phytoplankton, we measured the distributions of turbidity, nutrients, and phytoplankton across the salinity gradients of three estuaries: Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and the Hudson river estuary. Mixing diagrams were used to distinguish between conservative and non-conservative behavior; i.e. between loss from the water column and export to the estuarine plume on the shelf. In Chesapeake and Delaware Bays, we frequently observed a turbidity maximum in the oligohaline region, a chlorophyll maximum in clearer waters seaward of the turbidity maximum, and a nutrient-depleted zone at the highest salinities. In the Hudson River estuary, mixing diagrams were dominated by lateral waste inputs from New York City, and nutrient removal could not be estimated. In Chesapeake Bay, there was consistent removal of total N, nitrate, phosphate, and silicate from the water column, whereas in Delaware Bay, total N, ammonium, total P, and phosphate were removed. Total N and P removal in the Chesapeake and Delaware are estimated as ca. 50%, except for TP in the Chesapeake, which appeared to be conservative. Phytoplankton accumulation was associated with inorganic nutrient removal, suggesting that phytoplankton uptake was a major process responsible for nutrient removal. In the high salinity zone near and in the shelf plume, an index of nutrient limitation suggested no limitation in the Hudson, slight or no limitation in the Delaware, and widespread limitation in the Chesapeake, especially for P. These observations and information from the literature are summarized as a conceptual model of the chemical and biological structure of estuaries.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
65
References
406
Citations
NaN
KQI