Abstract Context.—Mucins are glycoproteins produced by both normal and neoplastic glandular epithelial cells including endocervix. Objective.—To determine the expression of mucins in uterine cervical glandular lesions and whether mucin expression correlates with the nature and origin of the glandular lesions. Design.—Antibodies to MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, and MUC5AC were applied on 52 cases including 14 endocervical adenocarcinomas (including 4 adenosquamous carcinomas), 9 endometrial carcinomas (8 endometrioid adenocarcinomas and 1 adenosquamous carcinoma), 8 adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 2 glandular dysplasias, 6 tubal metaplasias, 10 microglandular hyperplasias, and 3 normal endocervix. The presence of any staining was considered positive. Results.—All benign endocervical epithelia, including tubal metaplasia and microglandular hyperplasia, expressed MUC1, MUC4, and MUC5AC but not MUC2. Almost all endocervical AIS and carcinomas and all endometrial adenocarcinomas expressed MUC1; the exceptions were 2 cases of endocervical adenocarcinoma and 1 case of adenosquamous carcinoma of the endocervix. MUC2 staining was noted in 25%, 40%, and 22% of AIS, endocervical adenocarcinomas, and endometrial adenocarcinomas, respectively. About 38% of AIS, 75% of endocervical adenocarcinomas, and 44% of endometrial adenocarcinomas expressed MUC4. Half of AIS, most of endocervical adenocarcinomas, and 22% of endometrial adenocarcinomas expressed MUC5AC. The difference in MUC4 and MUC5AC expression between benign endocervical lesions and AIS and the difference in MUC5AC expression between endocervical and endometrial neoplasms were statistically significant. Conclusions.—Mucin expressions differed among benign endocervical lesions and AIS and among endocervical and endometrial malignancies. These results suggest that mucin staining may potentially be helpful in differentiating various uterine cervical glandular lesions.
The presence of malignant cells in peritoneal washings is an independent prognostic factor in the evaluation of gynecologic malignancies. The differentiation between reactive mesothelial cells and carcinoma cells can be a diagnostic challenge based on morphology alone. The expression of some cell adhesion molecules may be helpful in the differential diagnosis.To evaluate the specificity of 2 transmembrane cell adhesion proteins (E-cadherin and CD44) in the differentiation of mesothelial cells from carcinoma cells in pelvic washings, formalin fixed, paraffin embedded cell blocks of pelvic washings from 19 cases of metastatic ovarian adenocarcinoma and 16 cases of benign peritoneal washings were immunostained with monoclonal antibodies to E-cadherin and CD44. The staining patterns were evaluated blindly by three observers. Positive staining was defined as uniform membranous staining for each marker.Fourteen benign peritoneal washings (87.5%) demonstrated immunoreactivity with anti-CD44. On the contrary, only four adenocarcinomas (21.1%) demonstrated anti-CD44 immunoreactivity. E-cadherin expression was identified in only 2 benign peritoneal washings (12.5%) whereas 16 adenocarcinomas (84.2%) strongly expressed E-cadherin. The differences in immunostaining for both CD44 and E-cadherin between benign and malignant peritoneal washings were statistically significant. The combination of positive staining for E-cadherin and negative staining for CD44 was 100% specific for metastatic adenocarcinoma, whereas a combination of negative staining for E-cadherin and positive staining for CD44 was 100% specific for reactive mesothelial cells.Both E-cadherin and CD44 reliably distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from adenocarcinoma. The combination of E-cadherin/CD44 is highly specific and is a useful diagnostic adjunct with which to distinguish benign reactive mesothelial cells from adenocarcinoma in pelvic washings.
Primary liposarcoma of the breast is an extremely rare lesion. Only two cases describing the aspiration biopsy findings have been reported in the literature. We report the cytologic findings in an additional case, stressing the cytologic clues necessary to distinguish this neoplasm from a primary adenocarcinoma.A 53-year-old female presented to the emergency room with bleeding from a 20-cm, ulcerating mass in the right breast. Four months earlier she had been seen at another institution, where a diagnosis of poorly differentiated carcinoma was made by aspiration biopsy. Computed tomography had been negative for metastatic disease, and the patient refused further evaluation. Aspiration biopsy of the breast mass was repeated at our institution and interpreted as consistent with a poorly differentiated carcinoma. Histologic, immunophenotypic and ultrastructural evaluation of the mastectomy specimen revealed a pleomorphic liposarcoma.With increasing utilization of fine needle aspiration to evaluate breast lesions, it can be anticipated that unusual entities, including liposarcomas, will be encountered increasingly in breast aspirates. Therefore, it is important to consider liposarcoma in the differential diagnosis of aspirates showing isolated spindle and polygonal cells with vacuolated cytoplasm, nuclear scalloping and pleomorphism to avoid a misdiagnosis of carcinoma.
Background: Pancreatic masses may seldom represent a metastasis or secondary involvement by lymphoproliferative disorders. Recognition of this uncommon occurrence may help render an accurate diagnosis and avoid diagnostic pitfalls during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). In this study, we review our experience in diagnosing secondary tumors involving the pancreas. Materials and Methods: The electronic database of cytopathology archives was searched for cases of secondary tumors involving the pancreas at our institution and a total of 31 cases were identified. The corresponding clinical presentations, imaging study findings, cytological diagnoses, the results of ancillary studies, and surgical follow-up, if available, were reviewed. Results: Nineteen of the patients were male and 12 female, with a mean age of 66 years. Twenty-three patients (74%) had a prior history of malignancy, with the latency ranging from 6 months to 19 years. The secondary tumors involving the pancreas included metastatic carcinoma (24 cases), metastatic sarcoma (3 cases), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (2 cases), and plasma cell neoplasm (2 cases). The most common metastatic tumors were renal cell carcinoma (8 cases) and lung carcinoma (7 cases). Correct diagnoses were rendered in 29 cases (94%). The remaining two cases were misclassified as primary pancreatic carcinoma. In both cases, the patients had no known history of malignancy, and no ancillary studies were performed. Conclusions: Secondary tumors involving the pancreas can be accurately diagnosed by EUS-FNA. Recognizing uncommon cytomorphologic features, knowing prior history of malignancy, and performing ancillary studies are the keys to improve diagnostic performance and avoid diagnostic pitfalls.
