logo
    Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women
    56
    Citation
    29
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Citation Trend
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND Glandular atypia in Papanicolaou (Pap) smears from postmenopausal women is encountered frequently. This finding can be the result of artifactitious alterations such as drying artifacts and inflammatory changes or may represent a squamous or glandular, preneoplastic or neoplastic process. Therefore, it is important to determine the clinical implication of a diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) in postmenopausal patients. METHODS A total of 30,036 Pap smears were obtained from postmenopausal women between 1995 and 1997. Among these smears, 154 (0.51%) had a diagnosis of AGUS. Follow-up was available for 133 patients (86.4%); 110 patients (82.7%) had histologic follow-up (including cervical biopsy, endocervical [EC] curettage, and/or endometrial [EM] biopsy) and 23 patients (17.3%) had repeat smears. RESULTS Thirty-six of 110 patients (32.7%) were found to have a clinically significant lesion (defined as a preneoplastic or neoplastic, glandular or squamous lesion) on subsequent histologic follow-up. Nineteen patients (53%) had glandular lesions (15 EM adenocarcinoma [ACA] cases, 2 EC ACA cases, 1 EC adenocarcinoma is situ case, and 1 EM hyperplasia case). Seventeen patients (47%) had a squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) (6 cases of low-grade SIL, 9 cases of high-grade [HGIL], and 2 cases of squamous cell carcinoma). Among those patients with repeat Pap smears, five patients had persistent AGUS/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and one patient had an SIL. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of AGUS among postmenopausal patients was similar to that of the general population (0.51% vs. 0.56%; P > 0.05). A significant percentage of these patients were found to have a clinically significant lesion on subsequent follow-up. Furthermore, a majority of these lesions were ACA (53%) or HGSIL (26%). The findings of the current study strongly suggest the need for the close follow-up of postmenopausal patients with a diagnosis of AGUS. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2001;93:1–7. © 2001 American Cancer Society.
    Keywords:
    Squamous intraepithelial lesion
    Atypia
    Endometrial hyperplasia
    Curettage
    Clinical Significance
    Endocervical curettage
    <i>Objective:</i> The diagnoses of atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma imply totally different approaches because of clinical and patient-oriented ramifications, especially when morphological differences are not entirely conclusive. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia during curettage or endometrial biopsy and the definitive histological findings from hysterectomy material. <i>Study Design:</i> 23 patients were found fit for the current study and subsequently their clinical histories were reviewed for relevant clinical data, histopathological profiling and type of therapeutic interventions. <i>Results:</i> Adenocarcinoma was observed in 12 (52.17%) of 23 hysterectomy cases. The hyperplasia was found in 10 (43.47%) cases, although 4 of them lacked atypia and 1 case proved to be hyperplasia-free. <i>Conclusion:</i> Hysterectomy was prescribed as the next step in the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Other wait-and-see approaches could have easily forfeited the chances of providing an adequate treatment for an operable and curable cancer in approximately half of the studied cases.
    Atypia
    Endometrial hyperplasia
    Curettage
    Endometrial biopsy
    Atypical Hyperplasia
    Citations (34)
    We examined 70 cases of curettage (24 in normal proliferative phase and 46 with endometrial hyperplasia) and determined the percentage of clear cells among all glandular cells. The number of clear cells was increased in endometrium with hyperplasia without atypia or with minimal atypia (Grade of the endometrial hyperplasia I-IV. Classification of Hendrickson and Kempson 1979). It decreased as the hyperplasia became more severe. Besides we noticed an increase of clear cells in late proliferative phase. The relation of clear cells to estrogen level has been discussed.
    Endometrial hyperplasia
    Atypia
    Curettage
    Citations (0)
    Introduction: endometrial hyperplasia is a proliferation of endometrial glands in size and irregular shape, caused by excessive exposure to estrogen. Objective: to characterize the endometrial hyperplasia in patients at Eusebio Hernandez Hospital in 2011. Method: a descriptive study was conducted. 2842 pathology reports were reviewed in the Department of Pathology, at ''Profesor Eusebio Hernandez Gynecobstetric Hospital in Marianao, Havana from January 1st to December 31st, 2011. 1269 of them were for endometrial biopsies obtained by curettage. Results: 154 endometrial biopsies (12.1 %) had the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. The age range of diagnosis was more frequent for women between 41 and 50 years and the highest percentage of patients (84.4%) were diagnosed with simple hyperplasia without atypia; while 7.1 % of the cases showed atypia. The associated risk factor was obesity in 46.1 % of cases. Ultrasound had positivity in patients with atypical endometrial 90.9 % and 100 % hysteroscopy. Hormone therapy was used in 67.5 % of patients and surgical treatment was used in all patients with cellular atypia. Conclusions: there was a predominance of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia in women aged between 41 and 60 and with low parity and a low occurrence of atypical hyperplasia.
    Atypia
    Endometrial hyperplasia
    Curettage
    Atypical Hyperplasia
    Citations (0)
    To determine the preoperative and postoperative correlation of histopathological findings in cases of endometrial hyperplasia.One hundred and three patients with endometrial hyperplasia detected by surgical curettage performed due to various gynecologic pathologies were treated by hysterectomy. We compared retrospectively the histopathological diagnoses found on curettage with those found on hysterectomy specimens. The classification scheme endorsed by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists was used to classify the endometrial hyperplasia. The histologic findings found on the endometrial tissue of curettage specimens were correlated with those from hysterectomy specimens. Histopathologic evaluation was performed by a single skilled gynecologic pathologist.A total number of 103 women--76 (73.8%) premenopausal and 27 (26.2%) postmenopausal--were determined to have endometrial hyperplasia on histopathological evaluation of endometrial tissues obtained by endometrial curettage performed for evaluation of various bleeding abnormalities. These included 94 patients with simple hyperplasia without atypia (91.3%), two patients with simple hyperplasia with atypia (1.9%), five patients with complex hyperplasia without atypia (4.9%), and two patients with complex hyperplasia with atypia (1.9%). Histopathological evaluation of endometrial tissue obtained from hysterectomy specimens (of patients diagnosed with hyperplasia on curettage) revealed a total number of 65 cases (63.1%) with endometrial hyperplasia, and 38 cases (36.9%) with various histopathological findings. The correlation between preoperative and postoperative endometrial histologic findings was found to be statistically insignificant (r = 0.105, p = 0.29). Among 94 patients who were found to have simple hyperplasia without atypia on curettage specimens, 55.3%, were found to have simple hyperplasia without atypia, 1.1% simple hyperplasia with atypia, 5.3% complex hyperplasia without atypia, 9.6% secretory endometrium, 4.3% proliferative endometrium, 21.3% disorganized proliferative endometrium, 1.1% corpus luteum persistency, 1.1% basal endometrium, and 1.1% endometrium cancer on final hysterectomy specimens.Postoperative diagnosis of endometrial pathology might be different from that of preoperative especially in cases with simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.
    Curettage
    Atypia
    Endometrial hyperplasia
    Atypical Hyperplasia
    Citations (15)
    Recent reports suggest that atypical endometrial hyperplasia diagnosed by biopsy or curettage is accompanied by a higher than expected risk of coexistent invasive cancer. In order to test this hypothesis we reviewed the pathology and clinical history of all patients at our institution who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia with or without cytologic atypia. We found 24 patients of 45 with a preoperative diagnosis of hyperplasia with cytologic atypia, and 21 with simple or complex hyperplasia without atypia. No cancers were found at surgery in the latter group nor were any significant historical differences found between the two groups. Of the patients with atypia, 12/24 (50%) had an endometrial carcinoma and nine patients (37.5%) were stage IB or greater. This is a significantly greater risk than previously reported in the literature. Endometrial hyperplasia with cytologic atypia may carry a higher risk of coexistent invasive endometrial carcinoma than previously believed. Methods to identify those patients at highest risk should be determined.
    Atypia
    Endometrial hyperplasia
    Curettage
    Atypical Hyperplasia
    Endometrial biopsy
    The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the histopathological findings in curettage and hysterectomy specimens, to evaluate the accuracy of histopathological diagnosis in curettage specimens, and to determine the frequency of coexisting endometrial carcinoma in patients with histopathological diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia.Curettage and hysterectomy specimens of 135 female patients with initially diagnosed endometrial hyperplasia were retrospectively analyzed and compared.Simple hyperplasia was found in 49 patients (36.3%), complex hyperplasia in 14 (10.4%), simple atypical hyperplasia in 24 (17.8%), and complex atypical hyperplasia in 48 (35.5%) patients. After hysterectomy, 59 (43.7%) patients were found to have simple hyperplasia, 12 (8.9%) complex hyperplasia, 15 (11.1%) simple atypical hyperplasia, 18 (20.7%) complex atypical hyperplasia, and 21 (15.5%) endometrial carcinoma. The accuracy of histopathological diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia in curettage specimens was 82.2-89.6% and dependent on the types of hyperplasia. The frequency of coexisting endometrial carcinoma was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with atypical hyperplasia than in patients with hyperplasia without cytological atypia. After hysterectomy, coexisting endometrial carcinoma was found in 27.8% of patients with histopathological diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia in curettage specimens. In contrast to simple atypical hyperplasia, the frequency of coexisting endometrial carcinoma was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in complex atypical hyperplasia.The frequency of coexisting endometrial carcinoma in hysterectomy specimens in patients with histopathological diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia in curettage specimens was relatively high and it should be taken into account when planning therapy.
    Endometrial hyperplasia
    Citations (5)
    To evaluate the prevalence and epidemiologic characteristics of endometrial hyperplasias in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.We performed a retrospective analysis on data gained from 294 patients with histologically documented endometrial hyperplasia (with or without atypia), detected among 1,469 women who underwent fractional dilatation and curettage in our department due to abnormal uterine bleeding from 1986 to 1998. Epidemiologic characteristics were abstracted from the patients' medical charts.294/1469 women were found with endometrial hyperplasia (258 without atypia and 36 atypical hyperplasias). Thirty-six of them were under 40 years of age. Four of the detected endometrial hyperplasias progressed to endometrial carcinoma (one with simple hyperplasia, two with complex and one with atypical hyperplasia). Obesity and hypertension were justified as risk factors in our study population.The prevalence of endometrial hyperplasia according to our data was 20%. There were statistically significant differences in most epidemiologic parameters between the two types of hyperplasia. The progression of four endometrial hyperplasias to endometrial adenocarcinoma indicates the need for intense follow-up even in cases where patients undergo conservative therapy.
    Endometrial hyperplasia
    Atypia
    Curettage
    Endometrial Polyp
    Atypical Hyperplasia
    Citations (58)
    To determine agreement of preoperative and postoperative histopathology of endometrial hyperplasia (EH).Histopathology of specimens obtained by curettage and hysterectomy within 1 year was retrospectively compared by a skilled gynecological pathologist. Patients who received hormone therapy were excluded.Of 79 women with a preoperative diagnosis of EH, only 32 were diagnosed as EH from hysterectomy specimens. There was no endometrial cancer. The agreement between preoperative and postoperative histology did not achieve statistical significance (Kappa 0.011). Postoperative histopathology was more severe than preoperative diagnosis in 5 (6.3%) patients, including 3 preoperative diagnoses of simple hyperplasia without atypia, 1 simple hyperplasia with atypia, and 1 complex hyperplasia without atypia.For EH diagnosed by curettage, we can be sure of the diagnosis. However, 6.3% had more severe histology from hysterectomy specimens. Thus, repeated curettage or other investigations should be reconsidered in women with recurrent bleeding.
    Histopathology
    Atypia
    Curettage
    Endometrial hyperplasia
    Histology
    Citations (15)