Abstract: The influence of smoking on duodenal ulcer healing was examined during a double blind study of 83 patients randomly allocated to oxmetidine or cimetidine treatment. Smoking habits were recorded but patients were not advised to change these. Smokers and nonsmokers were similar clinically and did not differ in compliance with medication. Both H 2 ‐receptor antagonists were equally effective and after four weeks of treatment ulcers were healed in 76% of patients. Ulcer healing occurred significantly less frequently in smokers (69%) than nonsmokers (89%). Smokers with healed ulcers consumed fewer cigarettes per day (mean ± SE: 15.8±1.4) than those whose ulcers did not heal (22.2±2.7). When smokers were grouped according to daily cigarette consumption, a direct relationship was found between increasing cigarette consumption and decreasing frequency of ulcer healing. No reduction in ulcer healing was apparent in patients who smoked nine cigarettes a day, or less. (Aust NZ J Med 1983; 13:687‐590.)
Abstract A prospective assessment was made of the outcome 4 years after diagnosis of recurrence in a group of 27 patients with documented ulceration after highly selective vagotomy (16 symptomatic recurrence and 11 asymptomatic). In the 16 patients with a previous symptomatic recurrence, eight of the 11 patients with duodenal ulcer underwent a further endoscopy at 4 years and one active ulcer was found. Five patients with previous symptomatic gastric ulcer recurrence have all undergone further surgery. In the 11 patients who originally had an asymptomatic ulcer recurrence (five gastric, six duodenal) no patient has undergone further surgery, although two patients with a recurrent gastric ulcer and two with a recurrent duodenal ulcer subsequently developed symptoms from their ulcer and required H2 receptor blocker therapy. Eight of the 11 originally asymptomatic patients underwent further endoscopy at 4 years and two further duodenal ulcers were found. After highly selective vagotomy, asymptomatic ulcer recurrence occurs frequently and 40 per cent of these patients may develop symptoms.
The aim of this study was to compare recurrence rates of reflux oesophagitis (after endoscopic healing with omeprazole) over a 12 month period of randomised, double blind, maintenance treatment with either daily omeprazole (20 mg every morning; n = 53), weekend omeprazole (20 mg on three consecutive days a week, n = 55) or daily ranitidine (150 mg twice daily, n = 51). Patients were assessed for relapse by endoscopy (with gastric biopsy) at six and 12 months, or in the event of symptomatic recurrence, and serum gastrin was monitored. At 12 months, the estimated proportions of patients in remission (actuarial life table method) were 89% when receiving daily omeprazole compared with 32% when receiving weekend omeprazole (difference 57%, p < 0.001, 95% confidence intervals: 42% to 71%) and 25% when receiving daily ranitidine (difference 64%, p < 0.001, 95% confidence intervals: 50% to 78%). Median gastrin concentrations increased slightly during the healing phase, but remained within the normal range and did not change during maintenance treatment. No significant pathological findings were noted, and no adverse events were attributable to the study treatments. In conclusion, for patients who respond favourably to acute treatment with omeprazole 20 mg every morning, the drug is a safe and highly effective maintenance treatment for preventing relapse of reflux oesophagitis and its associated symptoms over 12 months. By contrast, weekend omeprazole and daily ranitidine were ineffective.
Recently, promulgated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) guidelines seek to decrease the need for surgery by improving disease control. However, resection rates remain static.We therefore sought to determine the proportion of patients coming to surgery where preoperative management was not optimal according to guidelines.Case notes of all patients with resection surgery for IBD from January 2007 to March 2008 at a metropolitan teaching hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Judgement was made as to whether preoperative management was optimal or suboptimal depending on whether it met guidelines.A total of 22 subjects with IBD-related resections were identified (15 males and seven females). In total, 17 had Crohn's disease (CD) (11 males) and five ulcerative colitis (UC) (four males). There were 10 smokers (nine CD and one UC). The two most common indications for surgery were inflammatory mass/abscess (n= 8) and refractory to medical therapy (n= 7). While all patients with known IBD (20/22) had seen a gastroenterologist in the past, five known IBD patients had resections undertaken without preoperative gastroenterologist input. Overall preoperative management was judged as optimal in only (9/22) 41%. Of those whose therapy did not meet guidelines (n= 13), five had azathioprine at doses <2 mg/kg, one declined therapy and nine with CD were current smokers.Over 50% of IBD resection patients had suboptimal preoperative management, with sub-therapeutic thiopurine dosing and smoking in CD the main problems. Thus, there are significant gains to be made with better use of standard therapies, as it appears that ∼50% of resection surgery was 'potentially avoidable'.
Forty-eight patients with chronic duodenal ulcers which were healed with cimetidine were allocated at random into two equal groups to assess different ways of using cimetidine during one year of treatment. Twenty-four patients received intermittent six-week courses of cimetidine for each relapse, and 24 patients were treated with maintenance administration of cimetidine (400 mg twice a day) continuously. Only one patient in the group receiving continuous therapy suffered clinical recurrence, but asymptomatic ulceration was found in four others. The group of patients who were receiving intermittent therapy suffered a total of 36 clinical recurrences. Three of these patients required prolonged treatment to heal their ulcers, and seven developed asymptomatic ulcer. The number of relapses varied from none to five. No way of predicting the individual prognosis was found. Intermittent treatment was an acceptable alternative in approximately half of the patients treated in this way, and was a failure in one-quarter of the group.