Papua has vital ethnic, cultural and local wisdom. Indigenous communities in Papua have a legal system and social institutions that have been passed down from generation to generation, including resolving conflicts or violations through the mechanism of customary fines (compensation) imposed by customary institutions. In some cases, customary fines imposed by customary institutions for acts categorized as criminal acts in national law are a consideration for law enforcement officials in handling these cases. This shows the integration between customary law and national criminal law in the law enforcement process in Papua. This research aims to determine the impact and contribution of local wisdom in law enforcement in Papua, especially in handling criminal acts involving customary fines. This local wisdom-based approach allows for a more peaceful resolution, focuses on togetherness, and is considered fairer by all parties involved. Traditional heads and traditional institutions play an essential role in mediating and determining the appropriate amount of fines, with deliberation being the key to reaching a fair agreement.
Interception is an act that violates human rights is therefore authorized the interception can only be done by law enforcement officers. In reality interception authority by police to deviate from the provisions that have been mandated by law. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on this study it can be concluded that the juridical consequences of the actions of police conduct authority lapses in implementing the interception an act that is against the law and may be subject to criminal sanctions, it is based on a systematic interpretation of Article 31 paragraph (3), the law enforcement officers who perform deviation authority interception the position equivalent to ordinary people who do the interception as stipulated in Article 31 paragraph (1). So the police action could be sanctioned as provided for in Article 31, paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 47 of Law ITE. Keywords: Deviation, authorized, Interception, Law enforcement
Tesis ini membahas tentang konsekuensi yuridis implementasi intersepsi kepolisian yang bertentangan dengan undang-undang. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tesis ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan beberapa pendekatan diantaranya, pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan historis. Intersepsi merupakan kewenangan penegak hukum, hal ini sebagaimana yang diatur dalam ketentuan undang-undang. Implementasi intersepsi terdapat perbedaan yang mendasar antara Kepolisian, Kejaksaan dengan KPK, perbedaan tersebut antara lain tentang pengaturan dimulainya kegiatan intersepsi. Sebelum diundangkannya UU No.11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE, hasil intersepsi yang berupa rekaman percakapan telpon dimasukkan dalam klasifikasi sebagai alat bukti petunjuk, hal ini didasarkan pada ketentuan yang tercantum dalam UU No.20 Tahun 2001 Pasal 26 jo Pasal 188 ayat (2) huruf a dan b KUHAP, namun setelah diundangkannya UU ITE rekaman pembicaraan tersebut masuk dalam kualifikasi alat bukti elektronik yang sah, sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 5 ayat (1) UU ITE. Selanjutnya terdapat pemahaman yang keliru terhadap pengaturan RPP Penyadapan, dalam ketentuan RPP Penyadapan standar operasional KPK diatur tersendiri dalam undang-undang, maka secara hirarkie peraturan perundang-undangan, ketentuan peraturan pemerintah dibawah ketentuan undang-undang, sehingga intersepsi yang dilakukan oleh KPK kelak tidak harus serta merta tunduk dan patuh terhadap pengaturan RPP tentang penyadapan. Adanya fakta hukum tentang pelaksanaan intersepsi yang dilakukan oleh kepolisian yang bertentangan dengan ketentuan undang-undang, adapun alasan yang dijadikan dasar bagi kepolisian adalah penafsiran ekstensif terhadap Pasal 31 ayat (3) UU ITE, dalam hal ini prespektif kepolisian, bahwa pengaturan yang tercantum dalam UU ITE terkait dengan kewenangan intersepsi adalah lex specialis, maka dari itu pihak kepolisian menafsirkan bahwa UU ITE memperbolehkan kepolisian untuk melakukan intersepsi terhadap semua tindak pidana. Setelah dilakukan penafsiran historis terhadap Pasal 31 ayat (3) UU ITE tersebut, ternyata maksud dari Pasal tersebut adalah implementasi intersepsi yang dilakukan kepolisian, kejaksaan dan KPK dikembalikan pada undang-undangnya masing-masing. Kemudian apabila dikualifisir tindakan kepolisian tersebut adalah tindakan tanpa hak atau bisa dikategorikan sebagai tindakan melawan hukum materiil. Selanjutnya konsekuensi yuridis dari tindakan kepolisian tersebut bisa dikenakan sanksi pidana, hal ini didasarkan pada penafsiran sistematis terhadap Pasal 31 ayat (3), bahwa bagi aparat penegak hukum yang melakukan penyimpangan kewenangan intersepsi, maka konsekuesi yuridisnya adalah dipersamakan dengan masyarakat biasa yang melakukan intersepsi. Sehingga tindakan kepolisian tersebut bisa dikenakan sanksi pidana sebagaimana yang termuat dalam Pasal sebelumnya yakni Pasal 31 ayat 1 jo Pasal 47 UU ITE. Demikian tesis ini semoga dapat menjadi bacaan yang bermanfaat dan menambah pengetahuan di bidang hukum bagi pembacanya.
Law enforcement without direction and not based on the three pillars of the justice of law, legal certainty and the benefits to society can break the law anyway even violate human rights. As one of the policies of the government that are not considered mencerminakan the values of justice and disturbing for the people, the government policy that acts of omission or delay in the application of the death penalty. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on these results it can be concluded that in the application of the death penalty there are serious legal issues, this is due to government policies that commit omission or delay in the execution of the death penalty is a violation of human rights as stipulated in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: Death penalty, Justice, Legal Certainty, Law
The Indonesian criminal law system has not been optimal in making the recovery of assets resulting from crimes that are not the target/focus of criminal law material because the current criminal law related to the recovery of assets resulting from crimes is only symbolic in its implementation so that the consequences for the interests of recovering the impact of crimes are regulated indirectly. and is abstract. The purpose of this study was to determine, analyze and describe the application of the authority of the Asset Recovery Center (PPA) in the settlement of state confiscations in the corruption and money laundering cases of PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero). This thesis research is included in the type of normative juridical research. Normative juridical research is research in which the law is conceptualized as what is written in the legislation (law in books) or the law is conceptualized as a rule or norm which is a benchmark for human behavior that is considered appropriate. The results of the Asset Recovery Center can receive and carry out asset recovery requests from other Ministries/Agencies with the approval of the Attorney General. Therefore, the Asset Recovery Center supports the execution of state booty in the corruption and money laundering cases of PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero).
This study aims to determine the legal consequences of decisions on narcotics criminal cases that deviate from the provisions of the general minimum special criminal law based on sufficient consideration by the Panel of Judges and the ideal concept of the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 of 2015 concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting in 2015 as a Guideline for the Implementation of Duties for the Court in narcotics criminal cases class I. The type of research in this study is normative juridical supported by interviews with informants. The results of the study in this discussion are that the legal consequences of a narcotics criminal case decision deviating from the provisions of the special minimum general criminal law based on sufficient consideration by the Panel of Judges are decisions that are contrary to the principle of legality and cause disparities in judges' decisions for other cases that are identical to legal facts and conflicts of interest between the Public Prosecutor and the Panel of Judges in the trial.
Indonesia recently ranked 96th for corruption index from 180 countries, means that still a lot of effort needed to reduce the number. The Imposing of laws for those who commit corruption and bribery have been implemented. Moreover, Government and Schools though people and student how to prevent it. Corruption becomes the main topic in everyday news. This paper tries to propose another action in order to reduce it namely Intrapreneurship. Intrapreneurship is similar to entrepreneurship, the first term refer to employees develops new business ideas for their companies within the company. On the other hand, Entrepreneurships defines as someone who starts up a new business with creativity to gain profit for better living using their own resources. This paper with design thinking method aims to find out some strategies how company could implement this program and at the end could reduce corruption.
The Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (Undang-Undang tentang Ketentuan Umum Dan Tata Cara Perpajakan or "KUP Law") does not explicitly regulate corporations as legal subjects or the types of offenses, sanctions, and criminal liability.As a result, a polemic of interpretation arises in the practice of its application so it is interesting to study theoretically.To examine these problems, they used normative legal research methods with approaches in the form of statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach.The results of the study show that although it is not explicitly regulated in the KUP Law, through systematic legal interpretation, corporations are actually legal subjects and violators of tax offenses so that they can be held accountable and sentenced to crime.In practice, there is an attempt to find the law by the judge in decision number 334/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkrt.Brt, which confirms that corporations are the subject of tax crimes.In addition, there is a decision number 2239 K/PID.SUS/2012 which applies the theory of vicarious liability in the imposition of corporate criminal responsibility simultaneously with its management.Since the KUP Law does not regulate the model of corporate criminal responsibility together with its management, the legal findings in the decision have caused controversy.Efforts are needed to revise the KUP Law by incorporating a comprehensive arrangement on the corporate criminal liability system into it to overcome polemics of interpretation and controversy in the field of law enforcement.
Masifnya penyebaran radikalisme dan aksi terorisme merupakan ancaman serius terhadap kedaulatan negara dan ideologi negara. Kondisi tersebut melatarbelakangi Pemerintah dalam upaya merumuskan Rancangan Undang-Undang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional Untuk Pertahanan Negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskanpembinaan kesadaran bela negara dalam menangkal radikalisme dan terorisme (tinjauan konsep, norma, historis dan praktiknya). Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) serta pendekatan sejarah (historical approach). Hasil dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan pentingnya menjelaskan konsep yang utuh mengenai upaya pembinaan kesadaran bela negara dalam perspektif konsep, norma, historis dan praktiknya. Karena dalam realitasnya terdapat permasalahan dalam substansi UU, tidak adanya penjelasan secara konkret dan komprehensif mengenai konsep pembinaan kesadaran bela negara, sehingga masing-masing pihak memberikan tafsiran yang berbeda-beda. Paradigam upaya pembinaan kesadaran bela negara adalah untuk mendukung usaha pertahanan negara, secara tersurat UU, mengelaborasikan antara pelatihan dasar kemiliteran secara wajib dengan pembinan kesadaran bela negara sebagai bagian dari upaya pembentukan karakter bela negara. Hal ini sangat berbeda dengan ide atau gagasan awal rumusan naskah akademik RUU PSDN Untuk Pertahanan Negara, yang secara eksplisit menyatakan bahwa konsep pembinaan kesadaran bela negara ditujukan untuk menangkal penyebaran radikalisme. Sehingga, sangat urgen untuk merumuskan konsep upaya pembinaan kesadaran bela negara yang tepat dan ideal dalam menangkal radikalisme dan aksi terorisme di Indonesia.
