Abstract. A new open biomass burning inventory is presented that relies on the fire radiative power data from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) on board the Suomi NPP satellite. This VIIRS-based Fire Emission Inventory (VFEI) provides emission data from early 2012 to 2019 for more than 40 species of gases and aerosols at spatial resolutions of around 500âm. We found that VFEI produces similar results when compared to other major inventories in many regions of the world. Additionally, we conducted regional simulations using VFEI with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with chemistry (WRF-Chem) for Southern Africa (September 2016) and North America (JulyâAugust 2019). We compared aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the model against two observational datasets: the MODIS Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) product and AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) stations. Results showed good agreement between both simulations and the datasets, with mean AOD biases of around +0.03 for Southern Africa and â0.01 for North America. Both simulations were not only able to reproduce the AOD magnitudes accurately, but also the inter-diurnal variations of smoke concentration. In addition, we made use of the airborne data from the ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES; Southern Africa) and the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments Experiment and Air Quality (FIREX-AQ; North America) campaigns to evaluate the simulations. In Southern Africa, results showed correlations higher than 0.77 when comparing carbon monoxide and black carbon. In North America, correlations were lower and biases higher. However, this is because the model was not able to reproduce the timing, shape, and location of individual plumes over complex terrain (Rocky Mountains) during the FIREX-AQ campaign period.
Abstract. The southeastern Atlantic is home to an expansive smoke aerosol plume overlying a large cloud deck for approximately a third of the year. The aerosol plume is mainly attributed to the extensive biomass burning activities that occur in southern Africa. Current Earth system models (ESMs) reveal significant differences in their estimates of regional aerosol radiative effects over this region. Such large differences partially stem from uncertainties in the vertical distribution of aerosols in the troposphere. These uncertainties translate into different aerosol optical depths (AODs) in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) and the free troposphere (FT). This study examines differences of AOD fraction in the FT and AOD differences among ESMs (WRF-CAM5, WRF-FINN, GEOS-Chem, EAM-E3SM, ALADIN, GEOS-FP, and MERRA-2) and aircraft-based measurements from the NASA ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES) field campaign. Models frequently define the PBL as the well-mixed surface-based layer, but this definition misses the upper parts of decoupled PBLs, in which most low-level clouds occur. To account for the presence of decoupled boundary layers in the models, the height of maximum vertical gradient of specific humidity profiles from each model is used to define PBL heights. Results indicate that the monthly mean contribution of AOD in the FT to the total-column AOD ranges from 44 % to 74 % in September 2016 and from 54 % to 71 % in August 2017 within the region bounded by 25∘ S–0∘ N–S and 15∘ W–15∘ E (excluding land) among the ESMs. ALADIN and GEOS-Chem show similar aerosol plume patterns to a derived above-cloud aerosol product from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) during September 2016, but none of the models show a similar above-cloud plume pattern to MODIS in August 2017. Using the second-generation High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL-2) to derive an aircraft-based constraint on the AOD and the fractional AOD, we found that WRF-CAM5 produces 40 % less AOD than those from the HSRL-2 measurements, but it performs well at separating AOD fraction between the FT and the PBL. AOD fractions in the FT for GEOS-Chem and EAM-E3SM are, respectively, 10 % and 15 % lower than the AOD fractions from the HSRL-2. Their similar mean AODs reflect a cancellation of high and low AOD biases. Compared with aircraft-based observations, GEOS-FP, MERRA-2, and ALADIN produce 24 %–36 % less AOD and tend to misplace more aerosols in the PBL. The models generally underestimate AODs for measured AODs that are above 0.8, indicating their limitations at reproducing high AODs. The differences in the absolute AOD, FT AOD, and the vertical apportioning of AOD in different models highlight the need to continue improving the accuracy of modeled AOD distributions. These differences affect the sign and magnitude of the net aerosol radiative forcing, especially when aerosols are in contact with clouds.
Abstract. The southeast Atlantic is home to an expansive smoke aerosol plume overlying a large cloud deck for approximately a third of the year. The aerosol plume is mainly attributed to the extensive biomass burning activity that occurs in southern Africa. Current Earth system models (ESMs) reveal significant differences in their estimates of regional aerosol radiative effects over this region. Such large differences partially stem from uncertainties in the vertical distribution of aerosols in the troposphere. These uncertainties translate into different aerosol optical depths (AOD) in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) and the free troposphere (FT). This study examines differences of AOD fraction in the FT and AOD differences among ESMs (WRF-CAM5, WRF-FINN, GEOS-Chem, EAM-E3SM, ALADIN, GEOS-FP, and MERRA-2) and aircraft-based measurements from the NASA ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES) field campaign. Models frequently define the PBL as the well-mixed surface-based layer, but this definition misses the upper parts of decoupled PBLs, in which most low-level clouds occur. To account for the presence of decoupled boundary layers in the models, the height of maximum vertical gradient of specific humidity profiles from each model is used to define PBL heights. Results indicate that the monthly mean contribution of AOD in the FT to the total-column AOD ranges from 44 % to 74 % in September 2016 and from 54 % to 71 % in August 2017 within the region bounded by 25°S–0° and 15°W–15°E (excluding land) among the ESMs. Using the second-generation High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL-2) to derive an aircraft-based constraint on the AOD and the fractional AOD, we found that WRF-CAM5 produces 40 % less AOD than those from the HSRL-2 measurements, but it performs well at separating AOD fraction between the FT and the PBL. AOD fractions in the FT for GEOS-Chem and EAM-E3SM are, respectively, 10 % and 15 % lower than the AOD fractions from the HSRL-2 and their similarities in the mean AODs are the result of cancellation of high and low AOD biases. GEOS-FP, MERRA-2, and ALADIN produce 24 %–36 % less AOD and tend to misplace more aerosols in the PBL compared to aircraft-based observations. The models generally underestimate AODs for measured AODs that are above 0.8, indicating their limitations at reproducing high AODs. The differences in the absolute AOD, FT AOD, and the vertical apportioning of AOD in different models highlight the need to continue improving the accuracy of modeled AOD distributions. These differences affect the sign and magnitude of the net aerosol radiative forcing, especially when aerosols are in contact with clouds.
Abstract. In southern Africa, widespread agricultural fires produce substantial biomass burning (BB) emissions over the region. The seasonal smoke plumes associated with these emissions are then advected westward over the persistent stratocumulus cloud deck in the southeast Atlantic (SEA) Ocean, resulting in aerosol effects which vary with time and location. Much work has focused on the effects of these aerosol plumes, but previous studies have also described an elevated free tropospheric water vapor signal over the SEA. Water vapor influences climate in its own right, and it is especially important to consider atmospheric water vapor when quantifying aerosolâcloud interactions and aerosol radiative effects. Here we present airborne observations made during the NASA ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) campaign over the SEA Ocean. In observations collected from multiple independent instruments on the NASA P-3 aircraft (from near-surface to 6â7âkm), we observe a strongly linear correlation between pollution indicators (carbon monoxide (CO) and aerosol loading) and atmospheric water vapor content, seen at all altitudes above the boundary layer. The focus of the current study is on the especially strong correlation observed during the ORACLES-2016 deployment (out of Walvis Bay, Namibia), but a similar relationship is also observed in the August 2017 and October 2018 ORACLES deployments. Using reanalyses from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), and specialized WRF-Chem simulations, we trace the plumeâvapor relationship to an initial humid, smoky continental source region, where it mixes with clean, dry upper tropospheric air and then is subjected to conditions of strong westward advection, namely the southern African easterly jet (AEJ-S). Our analysis indicates that air masses likely left the continent with the same relationship between water vapor and carbon monoxide as was observed by aircraft. This linear relationship developed over the continent due to daytime convection within a deep continental boundary layer (up to â¼5â6âkm) and mixing with higher-altitude air, which resulted in fairly consistent vertical gradients in CO and water vapor, decreasing with altitude and varying in time, but this water vapor does not originate as a product of the BB combustion itself. Due to a combination of conditions and mixing between the smoky, moist continental boundary layer and the dry and fairly clean upper-troposphere air above (â¼6âkm), the smoky, humid air is transported by strong zonal winds and then advected over the SEA (to the ORACLES flight region) following largely isentropic trajectories. Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory model (HYSPLIT) back trajectories support this interpretation. This work thus gives insights into the conditions and processes which cause water vapor to covary with plume strength. Better understanding of this relationship, including how it varies spatially and temporally, is important to accurately quantify direct, semi-direct, and indirect aerosol effects over this region.
Abstract. We present a new version of the Brazilian developments on the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (BRAMS), in which different previous versions for weather, chemistry, and carbon cycle were unified in a single integrated modeling system software. This new version also has a new set of state-of-the-art physical parameterizations and greater computational parallel and memory usage efficiency. The description of the main model features includes several examples illustrating the quality of the transport scheme for scalars, radiative fluxes on surface, and model simulation of rainfall systems over South America at different spatial resolutions using a scale aware convective parameterization. Additionally, the simulation of the diurnal cycle of the convection and carbon dioxide concentration over the Amazon Basin, as well as carbon dioxide fluxes from biogenic processes over a large portion of South America, are shown. Atmospheric chemistry examples show the model performance in simulating near-surface carbon monoxide and ozone in the Amazon Basin and the megacity of Rio de Janeiro. For tracer transport and dispersion, the model capabilities to simulate the volcanic ash 3-D redistribution associated with the eruption of a Chilean volcano are demonstrated. The gain of computational efficiency is described in some detail. BRAMS has been applied for research and operational forecasting mainly in South America. Model results from the operational weather forecast of BRAMS on 5 km grid spacing in the Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies, INPE/Brazil, since 2013 are used to quantify the model skill of near-surface variables and rainfall. The scores show the reliability of BRAMS for the tropical and subtropical areas of South America. Requirements for keeping this modeling system competitive regarding both its functionalities and skills are discussed. Finally, we highlight the relevant contribution of this work to building a South American community of model developers.
Abstract. Biomass burning aerosols (BBA) from agricultural fires in southern Africa contribute about one-third of global carbonaceous aerosol load. These particles have strong radiative effects in the southeast Atlantic (SEA), which depend on the radiative contrast between the aerosol layer in the free troposphere (FT) and the underlying cloud layer. However, there is large disagreements in model estimates of aerosol-driven climate forcing due to uncertainties in the vertical distribution, optical properties, and lifecycle of these particles. This study applies a novel method combining remote sensing observations with regional model outputs to investigate the aging of the BBA and its impact on the optical properties during transatlantic transport from emission sources in Africa to the SEA. Results show distinct variations in Ångstrom exponent (AE) and single scattering albedo (SSA) as aerosol age. Near the source, fresh aerosols are characterized by low mean SSA (0.84) and high AE (1.85), indicating smaller, highly absorbing particles. By isolating marine contributions from the total column during BBA transport across the SEA, our analysis reveals an initial decrease in BBA absorptivity, with mean FT SSA of 0.87 after 6–7 days, followed by increased absorptivity with mean FT SSA of 0.84 after 10 days, suggesting enhanced absorption due to chemical aging. These findings indicate that BBA becomes more absorbing during extended transport across the SEA, with implications for reducing model uncertainties. Our remote sensing-based results agree well with previous in situ studies and offer new insights into aerosol-radiation interactions and the energy balance over the SEA.
Abstract. Biomass burning smoke is advected over the southeast Atlantic Ocean between July and October of each year. This smoke plume overlies and mixes into a region of persistent low marine clouds. Model calculations of climate forcing by this plume vary significantly, in both magnitude and sign. The NASA EVS-2 (Earth Venture Suborbital-2) ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project deployed for field campaigns off the west coast of Africa in three consecutive years (Sept., 2016; Aug., 2017; and Oct., 2018) with the goal of better characterizing this plume as a function of the monthly evolution, by measuring the parameters necessary to calculate the direct aerosol radiative effect. Here, this dataset and satellite retrievals of cloud properties are used to test the representation of the smoke plume and the underlying cloud layer in two regional models (WRF-CAM5 and CNRM-ALADIN) and two global models (GEOS and UM-UKCA). The focus is on comparisons of those aerosol and cloud properties that are the primary determinants of the direct aerosol radiative effect, and on the vertical distribution of the plume and its properties. The representativeness of the observations to monthly averages are tested for each field campaign, with the sampled mean aerosol light extinction generally found to be within 20 % of the monthly mean at plume altitudes. When compared to the observations, in all models the simulated plume is too vertically diffuse, has smaller vertical gradients, and, in two of the models (GEOS and UM-UKCA), the plume core is displaced lower than in the observations. Plume carbon monoxide, black carbon, and organic aerosol masses indicate under-estimates in modeled plume concentrations, leading in general to under-estimates in mid-visible aerosol extinction and optical depth. Biases in mid-visible single scatter albedo are both positive and negative across the models. Observed vertical gradients in single scatter albedo are not captured by the models, but the models do capture the coarse temporal evolution, correctly simulating higher values in October (2018) than in August (2018) and September (2017). Uncertainties in the measured absorption Ångstrom exponent were large but propagate into a negligible (<4 %) uncertainty in integrated solar absorption by the aerosol and therefore in the aerosol direct radiative effect. Model biases in cloud fraction, and therefore the scene albedo below the plume, vary significantly across the four models. The optical thickness of clouds is, on average, well simulated in the WRF-CAM5 and ALADIN models in the stratocumulus region and is under-estimated in the GEOS model; UM-UKCA simulates significantly too-high cloud optical thickness. Overall, the study demonstrates the utility of repeated, semi-random sampling across multiple years that can give insights into model biases and how these biases affect modeled climate forcing. The combined impact of these aerosol and cloud biases on the direct aerosol radiative effect (DARE) is estimated using a first-order approximation for a sub-set of five comparison gridboxes. A significant finding is that the observed gridbox-average aerosol and cloud properties yield a positive (warming) aerosol direct radiative effect for all five gridboxes, whereas DARE using the gridbox-averaged modeled properties ranges from much larger positive values to small, negative values. It is shown quantitatively how model biases can offset each other, so that model improvements that reduce biases in only one property (e.g., single scatter albedo, but not cloud fraction) would lead to even greater biases in DARE. Across the models, biases in aerosol extinction and in cloud fraction and optical depth contribute the largest biases in DARE, with aerosol single scatter albedo also making a significant contribution.
'/%3e%3cpath id='l' d='M-26.25 0h52.5v-12h-40.5v-16h33v-12h-33v-11H25v-12h-51.25z'/%3e%3cpath id='k' d='M-31.5 0h12v-48l14 48h11l14-48V0h12v-70H14L0-22l-14-48h-17.5z'/%3e%3cpath id='b' fill-rule='evenodd' d='M0 0a31.5 35 0 0 0 0-70A31.5 35 0 0 0 0 0m0-13a18.5 22 0 0 0 0-44 18.5 22 0 0 0 0 44'/%3e%3cpath id='d' fill-rule='evenodd' d='M-31.5 0h13v-26h28a22 22 0 0 0 0-44h-40zm13-39h27a9 9 0 0 0 0-18h-27z'/%3e%3cpath id='n' d='M-15.75-22C-15.75-15-9-11.5 1-11.5s14.74-3.25 14.75-7.75c0-14.25-46.75-5.25-46.5-30.25C-30.5-71-6-70 3-70s26 4 25.75 21.25H13.5c0-7.5-7-10.25-15-10.25-7.75 0-13.25 1.25-13.25 8.5-.25 11.75 46.25 4 46.25 28.75C31.5-3.5 13.5 0 0 0c-11.5 0-31.55-4.5-31.5-22z'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='o' transform='scale(31.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='p' transform='scale(26.25)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='r' transform='scale(21)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='q' transform='scale(15)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='s' transform='scale(10.5)'/%3e%3cg id='m'%3e%3cclipPath id='c'%3e%3cpath d='M-31.5 0v-70h63V0zM0-47v12h31.5v-12z'/%3e%3c/clipPath%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' clip-path='url(%23c)'/%3e%3cpath d='M5-35h26.5v10H5z'/%3e%3cpath d='M21.5-35h10V0h-10z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cg id='h'%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d'/%3e%3cpath d='M28 0c0-10 0-32-15-32H-6c22 0 22 22 22 32'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cg id='a' fill='%23fff'%3e%3cg id='f'%3e%3cpath id='e' d='M0-1v1h.5' transform='rotate(18 0 -1)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23e' transform='scale(-1 1)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23f' transform='rotate(72)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23f' transform='rotate(-72)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23f' transform='rotate(144)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23f' transform='rotate(216)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/defs%3e%3crect width='100%25' height='100%25' x='-50%25' y='-50%25' fill='%23009b3a'/%3e%3cpath fill='%23fedf00' d='M-1743 0 0 1113 1743 0 0-1113z'/%3e%3ccircle r='735' fill='%23002776'/%3e%3cclipPath id='g'%3e%3ccircle r='735'/%3e%3c/clipPath%3e%3cpath fill='%23fff' d='M-2205 1470a1785 1785 0 0 1 3570 0h-105a1680 1680 0 1 0-3360 0z' clip-path='url(%23g)'/%3e%3cg fill='%23009b3a' transform='translate(-420 1470)'%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(-7)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23h' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(-4)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23i' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(-1)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23j' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(2)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23k' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23l' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(9.75)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(14.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23h' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(17.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(20.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23m' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(23.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23h' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(26.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23j' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(29.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23n' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(32.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23n' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(35.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(38.5)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='-600' y='-132'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='-535' y='177'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='-625' y='243'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23q' x='-463' y='132'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='-382' y='250'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='-404' y='323'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='228' y='-228'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='515' y='258'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='617' y='265'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='545' y='323'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='368' y='477'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='367' y='551'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='441' y='419'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='500' y='382'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='365' y='405'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='-280' y='30'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='200' y='-37'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' y='330'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='85' y='184'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' y='118'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='-74' y='184'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23q' x='-37' y='235'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='220' y='495'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='283' y='430'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='162' y='412'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='-295' y='390'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23s' y='575'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)