Purpose We investigated the experiences of cancer patients and their family caregivers who became aware that the cancer was terminal, how they became aware, and how they felt about disclosure of the information. Patients and Methods In this cohort study, we administered questionnaires to 619 consecutive patients determined by physicians to be terminally ill and to their family caregivers. Results A total of 481 patients and 381 family caregivers completed the questionnaire. A majority of patients (58.0%) and caregivers (83.4%) were aware of the patient's terminal status. Approximately 28% of patients and 23% of caregivers reported that they guessed it from the patient's worsening condition. The patient group was more likely than the caregiver group (78.6% v 69.6%) to prefer that patients be informed of their terminal status. Patients informed of their terminal diagnosis had a significantly better quality of life and fewer symptoms and had a lower rate of emotional distress than patients who guessed it from their worsening condition. Younger patients and patients who paid the treatment costs themselves were significantly more likely to want to be told when their illness was terminal. If the patient paid the treatment cost and was employed at the time of the cancer diagnosis, the family caregivers were more likely to prefer disclosure of terminal illness. Conclusion Most patients with terminal cancer and their family caregivers preferred disclosure, and patients who knew of their terminal diagnosis had a lower rate of emotional distress and a higher health-related quality of life.
SK Innovation and SK ie technology have developed and commercialized cover window films (FCW ® ) composed of functional coatings on transparent polyimide (PI) film for a foldable displays. We report on the development of PI film with high visual clarity, which can provide glass‐like feel to public users. Advances were achieved by engineering drying kinetics on the process of film fabrication, and the technology is applied to the commercial product of transparent PI film.
The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) as a first-line therapy for advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) has increased. However, several studies have reported NAC-induced platinum resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive impact of clinical factors on chemotherapy response score (CRS) and to select patients who would respond well to NAC. This multicenter retrospective (study included patients treated between January 2016 and December 2021). International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC and IV HGSOC patients were eligible. Institutionally strict complete resectability criteria were used in the present study. Pathological slides were scored according to the CRS criteria. Among 172 patients with HGSOC, 87 (50.6%) had stage IIIC disease and 85 (49.4%) had stage IV disease. And 35 (20.4%) had CRS1, 103 patients were CRS2 (59.9%), and 34 patients were CRS3 (19.7%). Compared with CRS1, simultaneous metastases to distant lymph nodes and solid organs confirmed by imaging were associated with a 75% reduction in CRS2 (odds ratio = 0.25; 95% confidence interval: 0.09–0.70; P = .008). And breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 mutation was positively (odds ratio = 8.41; 95% confidence interval: 2.25–31.52; P = .002) associated with CRS3 compared to CRS1. Patients with CRS3 had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS), with median PFS of 9.8, 14.8, and 27.0 months for CRS of 1, 2, and 3, respectively ( P < .001). Overall survival was also prolonged in patients with CRS3 ( P < .001). Germline breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 mutation was a predictor of CRS3 and a good prognostic factor for the survival rate. Simultaneous metastasis to distant lymph nodes and solid organs is a predictor of CRS1. CRS inversely correlated with PFS and overall survival.