Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia worldwide, characterized by accumulation of amyloid-β protein and hyperphosphorylated tau protein in the brain. Neuroinflammation, resulting from chronic activation of brain-resident innate immune cells as well as enhanced peripheral leukocyte access across the blood-brain barrier, crucially affects AD progression. In this context, TNFSF10, a cytokine substantially expressed in the AD brain, has been shown to modulate both the innate and the adaptive branches of the immune response in AD-related neuroinflammation. In this study, we explored whether a TNFSF10-neutralizing treatment could represent a tool to re-balance the overall overshooting inflammatory response in a mouse model of AD. Specifically, 3xTg-AD mice were treated sub-chronically with an anti-TNFSF10 monoclonal antibody for three months, and were then sacrificed at 15 months. TNFSF10 neutralization reduced the expression of the inflammatory marker CD86, inversely related to levels of the anti-inflammatory marker CD206 in the brain of 3xTg-AD mice, suggesting a switch of microglia towards a neuroprotective phenotype. Similar results were observed in the splenic macrophage population. Moreover, flow cytometry revealed a significant decrease of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ T regulatory cells as well as reduced number of CD11b+LY6Chigh proinflammatory monocytes in both the brain and the spleen of 3xTg-AD mice treated with anti-TNFSF10 monoclonal antibody. Finally, the treatment resulted in lower count of splenic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing PD1. The data suggest that TNFSF10 system-targeted treatment effectively restrain overshooting central and peripheral inflammation by rebalancing the overall immune response, mitigating the progression of AD pathology.
Background: The evolution of the pandemic has burdened the national healthcare systems worldwide and at present, there is no preferred antiviral treatment for COVID-19. Recently, the SARS-Cov-2 protease structure was released that may be exploited in in-silico studies in order to conduct molecular docking analysis. Methods: In particular, we compared the binding of twoantimalarial drugs, already in use, (i.e. chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine), which showed some potential clinical effects on COVID-19 patients, using ritonavir, lopinavir and darunavir as positive control tree antiviral recognized compounds. Results: Our results showed that hydroxychloroquine but not chloroquine exhibited a significant binding activity to the main protease similar to that possessed by protease inhibitors tested for other viral infections. Conclusion: Our data suggest that hydroxychloroquine may exert additional direct antiviral activity compared to chloroquine. In the absence of clinical studies comparing the efficacy of these two compounds, hydroxychloroquine may offer additional effects and may be considered as the first choice.
