Abstract Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a potentially fatal disorder that involves large areas of skin desquamation. Patients with TEN are often referred to burn centers for expert wound management and comprehensive care. The purpose of this study was to define the presenting characteristics and treatment of TEN before and after admission to regional burn centers and to evaluate the efficacy of burn center treatment for this disorder. A retrospective multicenter chart review was completed for patients admitted with TEN to 15 burn centers from 1995 to 2000. Charts were reviewed for patient characteristics, nonburn hospital and burn center treatment, and outcome. A total of 199 patients were admitted. Patients had a mean age of 47 years, mean 67.7% total body surface area skin slough, and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score of 10. Sixty-four patients died, for a mortality rate of 32%. Mortality increased to 51% for patients transferred to a burn center more than one week after onset of disease. Burn centers and nonburn hospitals differed in their use of enteral nutrition (70 vs 12%, respectively, P < 0.05), prophylactic antibiotics (22 vs 37.9%, P < 0.05), corticosteroid use (22 vs 51%, P < 0.05), and wound management. Age, body surface area involvement, APACHE II score, complications, and parenteral nutrition before transfer correlated with increased mortality. The treatment of TEN differs markedly between burn centers and nonburn centers. Early transport to a burn unit is warranted to improve patient outcome.
We report the occurrence of a refractory infection caused by the "rapidly growing" nontuberculous mycobacterium, Mycobacterium fortuitum, after incisional hernia repair using synthetic mesh. The patient had previously undergone three herniorrhaphies incorporating polypropylene mesh. Multiple surgical debridements were required, along with complete removal of all the mesh, to eradicate the infection. Prolonged antimicrobial therapy with sulfamethoxazole, an agent active against the patient's isolate, was also used. Although this atypical mycobacterium has been reported to cause a variety of infections, including many types of periprosthetic infections, this case represents successful treatment of M. fortuitum infecting abdominal wall mesh.
Because burn care in the United States is regionalized, burn patients are often transported across state lines to receive their burn treatment. The authors hypothesized that there are differences between in-state and out-of-state reimbursement for burn care. This project was conducted by the American Burn Association (ABA) Government Affairs Committee through the ABA Multicenter Trials Group. Participation was open to any member of the ABA. This retrospective observational study was approved by the institutional review boards of each participating institution. Subjects were identified using registry of each site, selecting patients hospitalized for burn injuries during FY2004-FY2006 of the hospitals. Once identified by the registry, the ID numbers were used to collect billing and reimbursement data from the financial offices. Data were sorted by age (adult and pediatric), location (in state and out of state), and payor source (Medicare, Medicaid, commercial, workers compensation, and self-pay). The rate of reimbursement was calculated based on charges and recoveries. Comparisons on data of each center were performed using Student's t-test with type I error <1%. Six facilities contributed data. A total of 4850 burn patients were reviewed, of whom 3941 were in-state burn patients and 909 were out-of-state burn patients. When the results from all six states were analyzed together, reimbursement for adults from Medicaid and Medicare was higher for in-state patients than for out-of-state patients. However, when analyzed by state, Medicare reimbursement between in-state and out-of-state patients did not differ significantly. In one state (Kansas), in-state Medicaid reimbursement was higher, but in two others (Arizona and Pennsylvania), in-state Medicaid reimbursement was lower than that for out-of-state reimbursement. Reimbursement for the care of children did not differ significantly based on state of residence. From these data, we conclude that there are indeed variations between in-state and out-of-state reimbursement, but those variations differ regionally. Indeed, in some cases, out-of-state reimbursement exceeds in-state reimbursement. Careful examination of these data is necessary before recommending policy change, although consideration should be given to a national policy that guarantees uniformity of reimbursement across all payors for burn patients regardless of their state of residence.
Muriatic acid (hydrochloric acid), a common cleaning and resurfacing agent for concrete pools, can cause significant burn injuries. When coating a pool with chlorinated rubber-based paint, the pool surface is initially cleansed using 31.45% muriatic acid. Here we report a 50-year-old Hispanic male pool worker who, during the process of a pool resurfacing, experienced significant contact exposure to a combination of muriatic acid and blue chlorinated rubber-based paint. Confounding the clinical situation was the inability to efficiently remove the chemical secondary to the rubber-based nature of the paint. Additionally, vigorous attempts were made to remove the rubber paint using a variety of agents, including bacitracin, chlorhexidine soap, GOOP adhesive, and Johnson's baby oil. Resultant injuries were devastating fourth-degree burns requiring an immediate operative excision and amputation. Despite aggressive operative intervention and resuscitation, he continued to have severe metabolic derangements and ultimately succumbed to his injuries. We present our attempts at debridement and the system in place to manage patients with complex chemical burns.
Introduction . Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a devastating soft tissue disease causing fulminant clinical deterioration, and extension into the retroperitoneum has a high mortality rate. This disease process demands a strong clinical suspicion for early identification which must be coupled with frequent wide surgical debridements and intravenous antibiotics for improved outcomes. Various clinical risk factors may render a weakness in the patient’s immune status including diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, obesity, and autoimmune disorders, such as a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Case Report . A 55-year-old male presented with hypotension requiring a large intravenous fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. He was diagnosed with the human immunodeficiency virus upon presentation. A computerized tomographic scan revealed air and fluid in the perineum and pelvis, ascending into the retroperitoneum. Multiple surgical debridements to his perineum, deep pelvic structures, and retroperitoneum were completed. After colostomy placement, antibiotic administration, and wound care, he was closed using split-thickness skin grafting. Conclusion . NF is a sinister and fulminant disease requiring prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention. The best chance for survival occurs with emergent surgical debridement and appropriate intravenous antibiotics. While retroperitoneal NF is consistent with uniformly poor outcomes, patients are best treated in an American Burn Association-verified burn center.
Journal Article Positive Fungal Cultures in Burn Patients: A Multicenter Review Get access James Ballard, BS, James Ballard, BS Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Linda Edelman, RN, Mphil, Linda Edelman, RN, Mphil Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Jeffrey Saffle, MD, Jeffrey Saffle, MD **Address correspondence to Jeffrey R. Saffle, MD, FACS, Dept of Surgery, 3B-306, University of Utah Health Center, 50 N. Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Robert Sheridan, MD, Robert Sheridan, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Richard Kagan, MD, Richard Kagan, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar D Bracco, MD, D Bracco, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Leopoldo Cancio, MD, Leopoldo Cancio, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Bruce Cairns, MD, Bruce Cairns, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Rose Baker, RN, Rose Baker, RN Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Paula Fillari, RN, Paula Fillari, RN Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar ... Show more Lucy Wibbenmeyer, MD, Lucy Wibbenmeyer, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar David Voight, MD, David Voight, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Tina Palmieri, MD, Tina Palmieri, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar David Greenhalgh, MD, David Greenhalgh, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Nathan Kemalyan, MD, Nathan Kemalyan, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Daniel Caruso, MD, Daniel Caruso, MD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Participating Members of the Multicenter Trials Group, Participating Members of the Multicenter Trials Group Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Burn Association American Burn Association Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Burn Care & Research, Volume 29, Issue 1, January-February 2008, Pages 213–221, https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e31815f6ecb Published: 01 January 2008
Phytophototoxic dermatitis is a strong phototoxic reaction to ultraviolet A (UV-A) radiation exposure after cutaneous contact with citrus fruit containing furocoumarins, leading to skin injury. At the Arizona Burn Center (Phoenix, AZ), the majority of these injuries are managed in the outpatient setting.The authors present a pediatric admission for burn-like injuries following prolonged cutaneous exposure to lemons while playing in the Arizona sunshine. A 7-year-old girl playing in her backyard squeezed lemon juice onto her skin while in the hot Arizona sunshine; within 24 hours, the child experienced pain, erythema, and blistering to multiple areas of her skin. She was admitted to the authors' burn center for wound care and pain control. She had scattered first-degree and second-degree burn-like lesions to her face, neck, and chest as well as bilateral forearms, hands, lower extremities, and feet. After blister debridement, appropriate dressing care, and pain medication, the patient was discharged home after 4 days of hospitalization with appropriate clinical follow-up.Burn-like lesions caused by furocoumarins after cutaneous absorption and UV-A exposure are known clinical entities in Arizona. The sequential progression from erythema to blisters equivalent to second-degree burn-like lesions to cutaneous hyperpigmentation is a well-described clinical triad. Meticulous wound care and pain control for the treatment of these burn-like lesions are essential as is the need for the wound care specialist to be well versed on this topic to quickly identify the etiology of the injury, thereby avoiding misdiagnosing the patient with nonaccidental traumatic injuries.
PHILLIPS, BRADLEY J. MD; MAZAHERI, MEHDI K. MD; MATTHEWS, MARC R. MD; CARUSO, DANIEL M. MD; FUJII, TISHA K DO; SCHILLER, WILLIAM R. MD Author Information
