Introduction New Zealand has experienced a rise in HIV diagnoses in recent years and new interventions are required to address this. Methods and analysis NZPrEP (A demonstration project of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in Aotearoa New Zealand) is an open-label, single-arm treatment evaluation study to investigate feasibility, retention, adherence, and clinical and behavioural outcomes of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provision to gay and bisexual men (GBM) in a publicly funded secondary sexual health service in Auckland, New Zealand. The sample size is 150 GBM. Inclusion criteria were specific behavioural risk factors indicating an increased risk of HIV infection. Exclusion criteria were hepatitis B infection, any medical contraindications to prescribing tenofovir/emtricitabine or factors limiting ability to adhere to the study protocol. Eligible participants will be screened for HIV and other sexually transmissible infections (STIs) and for any medical contraindications to PrEP, and enrolled for a maximum follow-up period of 96 weeks. They will be required to attend for 3-monthly testing for HIV and STIs and monitoring for renal and liver toxicity. Participants will also be required to complete an online behavioural survey after each study visit. The outcomes of interest are feasibility of PrEP provision in a sexual health clinic setting, PrEP acceptability, and adverse medical and behavioural effects of PrEP. The study sample is limited to 150 participants due to funding and service constraints. Statistical analysis of all primary and secondary outcomes will be performed using Stata V.14 at the University of Auckland. Results for primary and secondary endpoints will be reported after the conclusion of the study in March 2019. Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the Health and Disability Ethics Committee on 15 September 2016 (16/NTA/112). Key findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. A summary report will be circulated to the study and community stakeholders, and to the Auckland District Health Board, Ministry of Health and Pharmac. Trial registration number ACTRN12616001387415; Pre-results.
The relentless emergence and spread of strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae that are resistant to many antimicrobial agents has led to frequent changes in treatment guidelines, with a consequent risk that prescribers may not be aware of current guidelines.To determine the proportion of patients with gonorrhoea who were treated with a regimen consistent with the New Zealand Sexual Health Society (NZSHS) guidelines.We audited the treatment given to adult patients with laboratory-proven gonorrhoea in Auckland, New Zealand, during the first 6 months of 2015.Treatment compliant with the current NZSHS guidelines was administered in only 65% (458/706) episodes overall. Guideline-compliant treatment was much more likely to be prescribed for patients who presented to a sexual health clinic (89%) than for patients who presented to either a general practice or other community clinic (52%) or to a hospital (56%) (P < 0.0001). Overall, 52 of 706 (7%) episodes were not treated with any antimicrobial regimen by the service that diagnosed the patients' gonorrhoea, 13 of 62 (21%) episodes in patients who presented to a hospital, 34 of 403 (8%) episodes in patients who presented to a general practice or other community clinic and 5 of 241 (2%) episodes in patients who presented to a sexual health clinic (P < 0.0001).Low levels of compliance with treatment guidelines increase the risk that antibiotic-resistant strains of N. gonorrhoeae will spread within the Auckland region. Improved compliance with treatment guidelines, particularly in patients who present either to general practice or to hospitals, is necessary to maintain the efficacy of current treatment regimens.
Background New Zealand has among the highest rates of antimicrobial resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium in the world. The aim of this study was to correlate treatment outcomes with 23S rRNA and parC mutations associated with macrolide and fluroquinolone resistance, respectively, in a cohort of sexual health clinic patients. Methods Laboratory and clinical data were collected for patients with M. genitalium infections attending Auckland Sexual Health Service between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022, who had a test-of-cure performed within 21–90 days of a treatment episode. Treatment outcomes were correlated with the presence or absence of resistance mutations and treatment regimen utilised. Results A total of 95 infections from 93 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Eighty of 93 (86%) infections with available data were macrolide resistant, with 20 of 74 (27%) having both macrolide resistance and parC mutations. Sixteen of 20 (80%) of parC mutations were G248T (S83I), three of 20 (15%) G259T (D87Y) and one of 20 (5%) A247C (S83R). All macrolide-susceptible infections treated with doxycycline and azithromycin were cured (12/12), as were all macrolide-resistant infections without parC mutations treated with doxycycline and moxifloxacin (37/37). Cure rates for macrolide-resistant infections with parC mutations were lower, with variable and often multiple treatment courses; eight of 16 (50%) were cured using one course of sequential doxycycline and moxifloxacin, seven of nine (78%) with one course of minocycline, zero of two (0%) with pristinamycin and one of one (100%) with doxycycline and sitafloxacin. Conclusions Our findings highlight the differing treatment outcomes for infections with and without parC mutations, offering opportunities to refine management of M. genitalium infections.
Abstract Inequities in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) experiences will impede HIV epidemic elimination among gay and bisexual men (GBM). Ethnicity is a strong marker of inequity in the United States, but evidence from other countries is lacking. We investigated experiences on-PrEP to 12 months follow-up in a prospective cohort of 150 GBM in Auckland, New Zealand with an equity quota of 50% non-Europeans. Retention at 12 months was 85.9%, lower among Māori/Pacific (75.6%) than non-Māori/Pacific participants (90.1%). Missed pills increased over time and were higher among Māori/Pacific. PrEP breaks increased, by 12 months 35.7% of Māori/Pacific and 15.7% of non-Māori/Pacific participants had done so. Condomless receptive anal intercourse partners were stable over time. STIs were common but chlamydia declined; 12-month incidence was 8.7% for syphilis, 36.0% gonorrhoea, 46.0% chlamydia, 44.7% rectal STI, 64.0% any STI. Structural interventions and delivery innovations are needed to ensure ethnic minority GBM gain equal benefit from PrEP. Clinical trial number ACTRN12616001387415.
Background In New Zealand, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) should target gay and bisexual men (GBM), and equity is an important principle. Baseline characteristics of GBM offered PrEP in a demonstration project with an enrolment quota of 50% non-Europeans are described. Methods: An open-label, single-arm treatment evaluation study design (‘NZPrEP’) was used. The settings were four publicly funded sexual health clinics in Auckland in 2017. The study population was 150 GBM recruited from clinics, community sources and social media. Participants self-completed an online questionnaire about PrEP awareness, attitudes and sexual risk behaviour in the last 3 months. Baseline characteristics are described and examined to determine whether these were associated with PrEP initiation status (self-referral vs doctor/nurse recommendation). Results: In total, 150 GBM of whom half (52%) were non-European, including 21.3% Maori, 19.3% Asian and 8.7% Pacific, were enrolled into the study. Two-thirds (65.3%) self-referred for PrEP and one-third (34.7%) were recommended PrEP by the doctor/nurse. Participants reported a high number of male condomless receptive anal intercourse partners (MenAICLR) (median 3, range 0–50), with 10% reporting 10 or more MenAICLR and 45.3% reporting group sex. In the previous year, 65.3% had a sexually transmissible infection (STI); 18% had rectal chlamydia or gonorrhoea at enrolment. Almost half (47.7%) had recently used drugs with sex, including 8.1% who used methamphetamine. Participants recommended PrEP had lower education, lived less centrally and had a higher STI prevalence than PrEP self-referrers, but their risk behaviour was similar. Conclusions: Early PrEP adopters in New Zealand have high HIV risk. Demonstration projects should consider equity mechanisms so that minorities can participate meaningfully.
Azithromycin is a component of empirical treatment regimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections, but antimicrobial susceptibility testing for this agent is technically challenging. We compared the intertest variability, MIC values, and CLSI/EUCAST categorization of clinical and reference isolates of N. gonorrhoeae treated with azithromycin by testing 107 clinical isolates and nine reference isolates by agar dilution and in duplicates using MIC test strips (Liofilchem, Italy) and Etests (bioMérieux, France). Replicate isolate agreement within 1 log2 between duplicate tests was 87% for MIC test strips and 100% for Etests (P < 0.001). Essential agreement with the agar dilution method was higher for Etests (91%) than for MIC test strips (44%, P < 0.001). The geometric mean MIC was highest for MIC test strips (0.8 mg/liter) and significantly higher than both Etest (0.47 mg/liter, P < 0.001) and agar dilution (0.26 mg/liter, P < 0.001) methods. Etest MICs were higher than those obtained with agar dilution (P < 0.001). Agar dilution, MIC test strip, and Etest methods categorized 96%, 85%, and 95% (P = 0.003) of clinical isolates, respectively, as susceptible/wild type according to CLSI/EUCAST criteria. Our results illustrate the difficulties underlying azithromycin susceptibility testing for N. gonorrhoeae and demonstrate that results can vary using different methods. This variability could influence antimicrobial resistance reporting between laboratories involved in N. gonorrhoeae surveillance programs.
Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) has developed resistance to a wide range of antimicrobials. Population level data is essential to determine empiric treatment regimes. We sought to identify antimicrobial resistance patterns for NG in the Auckland region from 2008-2016, and review the utility of current methods of antimicrobial resistance testing.Antimicrobial susceptibilities and demographic data from NG isolates derived from patients attending the Auckland Regional Sexual Health Service and Auckland City Hospital were analysed to determine resistance rates and trends over time. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by agar dilution using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretation criteria.Results for 2,302 isolates from 1,941 patients were analysed. While ciprofloxacin resistance increased between 2008 and 2011, resistance rates for all antibiotics declined from 2013-2016. In 2016, 22% (53) of isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 7% (17) to penicillin, 31% (76) to tetracycline and 0.8% (2) exhibited decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone.Ceftriaxone is still suitable as a component of gonorrhoea treatment in our region but resistance to other agents prohibits their use for empiric treatment regimens. Current methods of detecting antimicrobial resistance for NG needed to be updated so that they are fit for purpose.