Abstract Introduction The traditional surgical management for acute Type A aortic dissection focuses on handling emergencies in the aortic root and ascending aorta. The remaining untreated distal portion of the aorta has a potential risk of rupture or causing malperfusion syndrome. Therefore, an aggressive repair approach using total aortic arch replacement combined with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation has been advocated. We describe the early and midterm clinical outcomes of the Thoraflex Hybrid graft for the treatment of emergency type A aortic dissection. Methods Between December 2017 and January 2022, 69 consecutive patients were admitted with acute type A aortic dissection; of those, 66 patients (62.9 ± 10.2 years of age, 81.8% men) underwent emergency hybrid aortic arch and frozen elephant trunk repair with the multibranched Thoraflex hybrid graft and were enrolled in the study. Primary end point were 30 days– and in–hospital mortality. To better clarify the impact of age on surgical outcomes, we have divided the study population into two groups: group A for patients < 70 years of age (47 patients), group B for patients ≥ 70 years (19 patients). Results All 66 device implants were technically successful. Mean follow–up was 19.7 ±17.4 months. 30–days– and in–hospital mortality were 10.6 and 13.6%, respectively. Stroke occurred in 3 (4.5%) patients. Two (3.0%) patients experienced spinal cord ischemia. Renal failure requiring CVVH and respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy were 30.3% and 28.8%, respectively. Overall survival for the entire cohort at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months was 85%, 80.3%, 76.5%, 74.4% respectively. We did not find any statistically significant difference among the two groups in terms of main post–operative outcomes. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard model showed left ventricular ejection fraction (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.79–0.92, p <0.01), peripheral vascular disease (HR: 15.8, 95% CI: 3.9–62.9, p < 0.01), coronary malperfusion (HR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01–0.77, p =0.03), lower limbs malperfusion (HR: 5.1, 95% CI: 1.10–23.4, p = 0.04) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1 – 1.04, p = 0.01) as independent predictors of long term mortality. Conclusions Hybrid aortic arch and frozen elephant trunk repair with the Thoraflex Hybrid graft to treat emergency type A aortic dissection appears to be associated with good early and mid–term clinical outcomes even in the elderly.
In a patient with pure autonomic failure, exercise did not modify beta-adrenoceptor density, probably due to an insufficient increase in plasma catecholamines. Isoproterenol infusion increased the number of beta-adrenoceptor by only 17%. Since in control subjects an increased beta-adrenoceptor level was found, following both physical stress and isoproterenol infusion, we suggest that the lack of increased beta-adrenoceptor levels may contribute to the poor circulatory adjustments observed in autonomic dysfunction during activities involving the sympathetic nervous system.
To report early clinical outcomes of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for the treatment of complex aortic diseases after transition from conventional elephant trunk.A single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent hybrid aortic arch and FET repair for aortic arch and/or proximal descending aortic aneurysms, acute and chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection with arch and/or proximal descending involvement, Stanford type B acute and chronic aortic dissections with retrograde aortic arch involvement.Between December 2017 and May 2020, 70 consecutive patients (62.7 ± 10.6 years, 59 male) were treated: 41 (58.6%) for emergent conditions and 29 (41.4%) for elective. Technical success was 100%. In-hospital mortality was 14.2% (n = 12, 17.1% emergent vs. 10.3% elective, P = NS); 2 (2.9%) major strokes; 1 (1.4%) spinal cord injury. Mean follow-up was 12.5 months (interquartile range, 3.7-22.3). Overall survival at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.2-97.3), 85.6% (95% CI, 77.7-94.3), 79.1% (95% CI, 69.9-89.5), 75.6% (95% CI, 65.8-86.9) and 73.5% (95% CI, 63.3-85.3). There were no aortic re-interventions and no distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE); 5 patients with residual type B dissection underwent TEVAR completion.In a real-world setting, FET with Thoraflex Hybrid demonstrated feasibility and good clinical outcomes, even in emergent setting. Our implant technique optimize cerebral perfusion reporting good results in terms of neurological complications. Techniques to perfect the procedure and to reduce remaining risks, and consensus on considerations such as standardized cerebral protection need to be reported.
Abstract Background Type A aortic dissection is an emergency with high morbidity and mortality when surgery is not performed. Few cases are described in the literature about aortic dissection during pregnancy. A correlation between pregnancy and aortic dissection is mainly reported in patients with family history and connective tissue disorders, such as Marfan’s syndrome (MS), Loeys–Dietz’s syndrome, and Ehlers–Danlos’s syndromes, and patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV); exceptional cases are also described in patients without risk factors. Case presentation A 22-year-old young woman with MS, ascending aorta dilation, and BAV became pregnant. During labor, she experienced a short-term chest pain with spontaneous resolution. The electrocardiogram (ECG) and cardiac biomarkers were negative for acute coronary artery disease, but no transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed. A caesarean section was performed without complications. After 1 month, a routine TTE showed a chronic ascending aortic dissection involving the aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels. Due to a normally functioning aortic valve, the David operation was performed (sparing aortic valve) with the replacement of the aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels. Conclusions Aortic dissection is a rare cardiovascular complication that can occur during pregnancy and is associated with very high-risk mortality. We have reported a rare case of undiagnosed type A aortic dissection involving the aortic arch during unplanned pregnancy in patients with BAV and MS, subsequently treated with the David surgery and replacement of ascending aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels. A closer clinical and instrumental follow-up is necessary in this particular group of patients at risk. Awareness of all physicians involved is mandatory.
The accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis and surgical management of acute aortic dissection was determined in 54 patients who underwent surgery for acute aortic dissection. Results of the investigations were compared to the surgical assessment. From April 1993 to November 1997, we operated 54 patients (44 male and 10 female) for acute aortic dissection. Mean age was 60 +/- 9 years. At surgery, a De Bakey type I aortic dissection was diagnosed in 30 patients, type II in 23 and type III retrograde in 1. Operating procedures were: replacement of ascending aorta (24 cases), replacement of ascending aorta and aortic arch (17 cases), replacement of ascending aorta and aortic valve replacement (2 cases), Bentall procedure (6 cases) and end-to-end anastomosis of the ascending aorta (4 cases). Initial diagnosis, performed in emergency wards, was done on a clinical basis in 6 patients, on CT scan in 19, on transthoracic echocardiography in 14, and on TEE basis in 12. Three patients underwent angiography before our evaluation. As per our protocol, all patients underwent confirmation of the diagnosis by TEE. Seven patients needed additional instrumental investigations, 2 with CT scan and 5 with angiography. TEE confirmed the diagnosis of aortic dissection in all cases but one. Moreover, it described the site of the intimal tear, the extension of the dissecting process and accessory findings, such as pericardial effusion, aortic incompetence and left ventricular function. The interval between patient presentation and skin incision was a maximum of 70 minutes. At surgery, diagnosis of De Bakey classification was confirmed in 98% of cases; in 90.7% of cases exact location of the entry site was confirmed. In one case, an entry site in the arch diagnosed by TEE but not recognized at surgery, was observed at necropsy. Intraoperatively, we routinely used TEE to monitor retrograde systemic perfusion and correct implant of the vascular prosthesis. One case of malperfusion of the thoracic aorta through the false lumen was observed and managed. In one case we diagnosed acute obstruction of the prosthesis by bleeding in the wrapped aorta, which required reoperation. Assessment of ventricular function was obtained in all patients: in two cases, observation of low right ventricular function led us to perform aortocoronary by-pass to the right coronary artery. In conclusion, the high level of correspondence between TEE diagnosis and surgical anatomy prompted us to perform transesophageal echocardiography as the primary and often sole diagnostic procedure in acute aortic dissection. TEE, in experienced hands, has proven to be a highly reliable, safe and low-cost diagnostic tool. It can be performed at the patient's bedside within just a few minutes of the suspected diagnosis, thereby lowering the mortality rate of the natural history. Again, it can also be used in the operating theatre as an "on-line examination" as well as for assessment of correct surgical repair. Other diagnostic procedures do not yield more information and can cause dangerous delays in intervention.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)