Abstract Background Age ≥ 65 years is regarded as a relative contraindication for bariatric surgery. Advanced age is also a recognised risk factor for adverse outcomes with Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) which continues to wreak havoc on global populations. This study aimed to assess the safety of bariatric surgery (BS) in this particular age group during the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison with the younger cohort. Methods We conducted a prospective international study of patients who underwent BS between 1/05/2020 and 31/10/2020. Patients were divided into two groups — patients ≥ 65-years-old (Group I) and patients < 65-years-old (Group II). The two groups were compared for 30-day morbidity and mortality. Results There were 149 patients in Group 1 and 6923 patients in Group II. The mean age, preoperative weight, and BMI were 67.6 ± 2.5 years, 119.5 ± 24.5 kg, and 43 ± 7 in Group I and 39.8 ± 11.3 years, 117.7±20.4 kg, and 43.7 ± 7 in Group II, respectively. Approximately, 95% of patients in Group 1 had at least one co-morbidity compared to 68% of patients in Group 2 ( p = < 0.001). The 30-day morbidity was significantly higher in Group I (11.4%) compared to Group II (6.6%) ( p = 0.022). However, the 30-day mortality and COVID-19 infection rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions Bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a higher complication rate in those ≥ 65 years of age compared to those < 65 years old. However, the mortality and postoperative COVID-19 infection rates are not significantly different between the two groups. Graphical abstract
Aim: The routine use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) during the preoperative evaluation of surgical weight loss candidates is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the findings of preoperative EGD in patients who are scheduled for a primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The probable effect of these findings on the medical and surgical strategy that was followed is assessed. Methods: Findings of EGD obtained from consecutive LSG candidates and all data were prospectively recorded and retrieved from the database. Results: A total of 819 patients underwent EGD successfully. Mean age and body mass index were 38 ± 11.3 and 43.17 ± 7.2 kg/m2, respectively. Fifty-eight percent were female. EGD of 263 (32.1%) patients was normal and 687 (84%) patients were asymptomatic. At least one abnormal finding was detected in 65% of the asymptomatic patients. Abnormal findings that did not change the surgical strategy were found in 550 patients (67.2%). Findings such as gastritis or duodenitis that changed the medical management before surgery were found in 309 patients (38.2%). Helicobacter pylori was positive in 218 (26.6%) patients but eradication treatment was not applied in the preoperative period. No pathology was detected that would create absolute contraindication or change the type of surgery in any patient. Only technical modifications were required in 13% due to hiatal hernia. The timing of the planned surgery has changed in only 6 patients (0.74%) (early stage neuroendocrine tumor, leiomyoma, severe ulcer). Conclusions: Routine EGD performed before LSG did not change the planned bariatric option in any patient, but led to 13% rate of technical modifications due to the presence of hiatal hernia. At least one abnormal finding was detected in 65% of asymptomatic patients. Due to endoscopic findings, the rate of patients who started medical acid-suppression treatment in the preoperative period was 38%.
This study aims to assess the prevalence of preoperative and postoperative nutritional deficiencies and associated factors in patients who are eligible for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.Patients who underwent primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between December 2018 and April 2020 were included in the study. All patients were screened by detailed laboratory tests pre- and post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 6th and 12th months. Patients' data, which were recorded prospectively, were analyzed retrospectively.A total of 228 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 39 ± 11.5 (60% female), and the mean body mass index was 41.2 ± 6.3 kg/m2. In the preoperative period, anemia was detected in 20 female patients (9%), low ferritin levels were detected in 25%, B12 and folic acid deficiencies were detected in 2.6% and 12.3%, respectively, and vitamin D deficiency was detected in 76% of the patients. During the postoperative follow-up, 77% of the patients received multivitamin supplements regularly. Mean body mass index regressed to 27.1 ± 4.2 kg/m2 in the first year. Incidence of anemia was found at 4.8%, low ferritin levels were 14%, folate deficiency was 5.3%, B12 deficiency was 5.3%, and vitamin D deficiency was 25% in the 12th month. Vitamin A, zinc, biotin, and thiamine deficiencies were 8.8%, 6.6%, 11%, and 2.2% in the 12th month, respectively.In the preoperative period, we detected significant deficiencies in some vitamins. The incidence of de novo vitamin deficiency during post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy follow-up was low. Regular multivitamin-multimineral use may have an effect on this.
Porta-mesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) is a rare but fatal complication in patients who are undergoing bariatric surgery. In this report, we present a rare case of a PMVT after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A 52-year-old male patient with a body mass index of 42 kg/m2 was admitted to our clinic for morbid obesity. Standart LSG was performed with 5 trocar technique. 15 days after LSG, the patient admitted to the emergency department with complaints of abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. The patient was dehydrated. His C-reactive protein level was 138 mg/L. Abdominal computerized tomography with contrast was performed and showed thickening of a part of small bowel wall in 10 cm length. Also, major trombosis were detected in the superior mesenteric vein branches and portal vein. The patient was hospitalized and 2 × 10,000 IU/1.0 mL high dosage low moleculer weight heparin (LMWH) therapy was initiated. The patient's clinical signs recovered rapidly following treatment. İn LSG, if the gastroepiploic venous arcus, which runs along the greater curvatura, and has a direct connection to the portal circulation is damaged, a local thrombus may form and move towards the portal system over time. Dehydration is another significant predisposing factor for PMVT. Some patients may develop life-threatening intestinal ischemia. Abdominal tomography with contrast plays a major role in diagnosis. PMVT should be considered as a serious complication after LSG in patients with abdominal pain. With early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy, patients's clinical symptoms may improve quicly.
Whether concomitant cholecystectomy is needed during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis is controversial. In this study, our aim is to show the follow-up results in patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis who underwent LSG alone.Patients undergoing primary LSG between March 2018 and September 2020 with asymptomatic gallbladder stones were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent abdominal ultrasound (US) before surgery. Patients' demographics and postoperative outcomes were recorded.A total of 180 patients underwent primary LSG and completed the 1-year follow-up. The study population consisted of 42 patients (23%) with asymptomatic cholelithiasis. The mean age was 41.1±7.1 years (31-56, 63% female), and mean body mass index (BMI) was 44 ± 6.7 kg/m2. Average BMI decreased to 31.1 ± 4.7 kg/m2 at 6 months and to 27.3 ± 3.6 kg/m2 at 1 year. The average follow-up period was 17 ± 5.7 months (range, 12-28 months). Of the 42 patients, only 1 patient (2.4%) became symptomatic during the follow-up period.We do not recommend cholecystectomy in patients with asymptomatic gallstones during the same session with LSG. An observational approach should be adopted for these patients.
Aim: Several studies demonstrated increased alcohol intake after gastric bypass but not for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is an increased risk of developing alcohol use disorder after LSG. Materials and Methods: LSG patients with at least 1-year follow-up who completed the alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT) preoperatively, and at their control visit, were the subjects. AUDIT was applied to the patients who were followed up from 1 to 6 years postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups as those who were followed for 1–3 years and 4–6 years. AUDIT scores and risk categories were compared. According to the AUDIT results, score intervals between 0–7, 8–15, 16–19 and 20–40 identified patients with low, moderate, high risk, and alcoholism, respectively. Results: There were 183 LSG patients eligible for inclusion. An AUDIT score of 2.79 before LSG showed prominent reduction in alcohol use in the first 3 years after LSG with a score of 2.27 (P = .033). At 4–6 years follow-up, AUDIT scores showed significant increase from 3.06 to 4.04, suggesting an increase in alcohol use in the long term (P = .042). In addition, the increase of risk after surgery in pre-LSG moderate-risk category (n = 21) turned out to be higher than pre-LSG low-risk category (n = 162). Conclusions: This study showed reduction in AUDIT scores in the first 3-year follow-up after LSG and increase in the 4–6 years follow-up. High pre-LSG AUDIT score, a potential risk for future alcohol use disorder, was one of the key findings of our study. Screening of LSG candidates before and after surgery by AUDIT scoring according to risk categories with larger samples will provide useful input for relevant guidelines.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which can be seen in up to 30% in postoperative series, is perhaps the most important complication of sleeve gastrectomy(SG). The general trend for patients who are planning to have bariatric surgery and have symptomatic GERD, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most common choice. A 42-year-old female patient with a body mass index of 36 kg/m2 presented to our clinic with obesity and symptomatic GERD. She had been using proton pump inhibitör (PPI) regularly for 1 year. Preoperative endoscopy showed hiatal hernia but no esophagitis. The patient underwent ambulatory pH study and GERD was confirmed. The patient was scheduled to have laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair plus combined partial posterior fundoplication and sleeve gastrectomy. Hiatal hernia was repaired, gastric fundus was passed behind the esophagus and partial posterior fundoplication was performed, and than SG was completed. She stopped using PPI in the early postoperative period and her reflux symptoms disappeared completely. The patient lost 20 kg in the 3rd month (%40 ewl) and underwent controlled ambulatory pH moniterization and no reflux was detected. İn some cases this technique can be proposed to obese patients with GERD as a primary treatment modality. High numbers of patients and longer follow up care are needed to assess the long term efficacy and safety of this technique.
Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of intraoperative awereness (IA) in our patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and the factors affecting the formation of this complication. Methods: Four hundred ten patients who underwent LSG between March 2018 and September 2020 were included in the study. By April 2019, we started using the Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring, which measures the depth of anesthesia in all of our LSG cases (n = 167). Patients with and without BIS monitorization were divided into two groups and compared. Results: In our series, IA was seen in 3 patients (2 males) in two different hospitals (0.7%; n = 410). They were all in the non BIS group (n = 243). The median duration of anesthesia was 120 minutes (ranging 90-180) in the non-BIS, and 113 minutes (ranging, 90-140) in the BIS group (p < 0.001). Hypotension developed in 63 patients in non-BIS and 12 patients in BIS group at the beginning of the operation (< 90/60 mm Hg). The total remifentanil infusion dose administered during the anesthesia period in the BIS group was 1310 ± 351 mcg, and 1330 ± 270 mcg in the non BIS group (p = 0.002). The effect of BIS monitorization between groups on IA, did not show statistical significance (p = 0.27). Conclusions: Anesthesia techniques that work well for patients with normal weight may not be safe and appropriate for obese patients. Especially in patients with intraoperative hypotension, it is necessary to be more careful about dose adjustment of anesthetic drugs.
Aim: Few adverse effects may occur after bariatric surgery, one being the formation of gallstones. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of cholelithiasis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and whether ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment reduces gallstone formation. Materials and Methods: Gall bladders of all patients planned for LSG were preoperatively checked by ultrasonography (USG). Patients who had no documented gallbladder pathology before LSG and who had USG at 12th month and 2 years follow-up after LSG were included in the study. The incidences of newly developed cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requirement in patients who did not receive any UDCA treatment (pre-2015 protocol, n = 128) was compared with the corresponding numbers in patients who regularly used 500 mg/day oral UDCA for 6 months after the LSG (post-2015 protocol, n = 152). Results: Between January 2012 and October 2018, 717 LSGs were performed in two centers and after exclusions, 280 patients were eligible for evaluation. Sixty-four of 280 (23%) patients developed cholelithiasis after LSG and cholecystectomy was performed in 24 patients (8.6%) for symptomatic cholelithiasis. In the non-UDCA group, 48 patients developed cholelithiasis (n = 48/128, 37.5%) compared with 16 patients in the UDCA group (n = 16/152, 10.5%) (P < .001). Compared with 5 patients in the UDCA group, 19 patients underwent cholecystectomy (39.6%) in the non-UDCA group due to symptomatic cholelithiasis (P = .55) and 5 of these patients also required an ERCP. No ERCP became necessary in the UDCA group (P = .2). Conclusions: An almost fourfold decrease in the rate of new gall stone formation with 500 mg daily UDCA treatment was impressive and may suggest routine UDCA treatment after LSG. Given the rate of exclusions and follow-up differences among the groups, certainly, randomized trials, with less exclusion are needed to provide conclusive evidence.