Data on all new breast cancer cases in the Auckland area during the nine years September 1976 to September 1985 were used to obtain epidemiological information on breast cancer in the Auckland region. Breast tumours were found in 2706 women (300 per year), yielding a lifetime risk of breast cancer of one in 15. No significant difference in breast cancer incidence was detected between European, Maori and Pacific Island Polynesian women. Confidence limits for incidence were wide in the later groups. Fifty-one percent of women presented with intermediate sized (2-5 cm) tumours, and most (66%) were node negative. Eleven percent had evidence of metastatic disease at presentation. When the relationships between race, tumour size, nodal status and metastases were examined, Pacific Island women more frequently presented with large tumours and metastases, whereas Maori women were more frequently node positive. Eighty-five percent of tumours were invasive ductal carcinomas, 55% grade II, 35% grade III, and 10% grade I. Sixty-seven percent of tumours were oestrogen receptor positive (ER+ve) and ER status was significantly related to age; the proportion of ER+ve tumours was greater in older women. Fifty-seven percent of tumours were progesterone receptor positive (PR+ve), and PR distribution was bimodal with age. These data from the Auckland region are similar to breast cancer figures from other western countries, with some ethnic differences in tumour size and frequency of metastatic disease at presentation.
Between September 1976 and May 1980, 135 patients with operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes received l-phenylalanine mustard, adjunct to surgery, 0.15 mg/kg for five days, six weekly, and were randomised prospectively to levamisole 150 mg for three days, two weekly, or a placebo. Treatment was continued for two years or until evidence of treatment failure, whichever was the sooner. At 4 1/2 years, for all patients, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.09), but in a subgroup of women ⩽50 with 1–3 positive nodes, levamisole had a negative effect (P = 0.05). Although an analysis of the same age group, independent of the nodal status, did not reach significance, there was a trend in favor of placebo (P = 0.08) which was also apparent in premenopausal women (P = 0.15). In postmenopausal patients, however, and in those with more advanced disease with four or more positive nodes, although the results also failed to reach significance the trend in these subgroups favored levamisole. The results of this study suggest that levamisole has no place in the primary therapy of breast cancer in younger women and those with more favorable disease. The value of this agent in older patients and those with more advanced primary disease, remains unproven, but the favorable trends are in accord with a number of other studies with levamisole in metastatic breast and resectable lung cancer. Retrospective analysis confined to those women who received 75% or more of the total dose of l-phenylalanine mustard showed no evidence for a dose-responsive effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the described pattern of results.
Background: Current evidence indicates that exercise therapy (ET) has a short and medium-term benefit for hip osteoarthritis (OA), but evidence is inconclusive regarding the effect of manual therapy (MT). The primary aim of this randomised controlled trial was to determine the effectiveness of ET with and without MT on clinical outcomes for individuals with hip OA. A secondary aim was to ascertain the effect of an 8-week waiting period on outcomes. Methods: 131 men and women with hip OA recruited in four hospitals were initially randomised to one of three groups: ET (n = 45), a combination of ET and MT (n = 43) and wait-list control (n = 43). The two intervention groups underwent individualised ET or ET/MT for 8 weeks. Patients in the control group waited 8 weeks and were randomised to receive either ET or ET/MT after 9 week follow-up, and pooled with original treatment group data: ET (n = 66) and ET/ MT (n = 65). All participants were followed up at 9 and 18 weeks and the control group was reassessed at 27 weeks (18 weeks post-treatment) by the same blinded assessor. The primary outcome measure was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Other outcomes included sit-to-stand, 50-foot walk test, pain severity, hip range of motion (ROM), anxiety, depression, quality of life (QOL), analgesic usage, physical activity, patient-perceived change and patient satisfaction. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed to determine within-group change and between-group differences for the three groups at baseline and 9 weeks, and the two treatment groups at baseline, 9 and 18 weeks. Results: Eight patients (6.1%) were lost to follow-up at 9 weeks and 19 (14.5%) were lost to follow-up by 18 weeks. Both ET (n = 66) and ET/MT groups (n = 65) showed significant within-group improvements in WOMAC, pain severity, sit-to-stand and HROM measures at 9 weeks, which were still evident at 18 weeks. There was no significant within-group change in anxiety, depression, QOL, analgesic usage, 50-foot walk test or physical activity. There was no significant difference between the two intervention groups for any of the outcomes. Regarding the results of the original ET, ET/MT and control group allocation, there was a significant improvement in one or both ET and ET/MT groups compared with the control group in the same outcomes, as well as patient perceived improvement at 9 weeks. There was no significant difference between the three groups in analgesic usage, WOMAC stiffness subscale, sit-to-stand and 50 foot walk tests, QOL and physical activity. There was an overall deterioration in anxiety and depression scores. Conclusions: The addition of MT to an 8 week programme of ET for hip OA resulted in similar improvements in pain, function and ROM at 9 and 18 weeks. The significant improvement which occurred in the same outcomes in the two treatment groups compared with a wait-list control of 8 weeks has implications for waiting list management Disclosure statement: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Survival in 38 patients with bilateral breast cancer has been studied. The tumours were synchronous in 14 patients and metachronous in 24. Survival was less than that predicted for either tumour on the basis of a previously developed index involving lymph node status, oestrogen receptor content, progesterone receptor content, and patient age. Simple addition of the indices for the two tumours gave a better predictor although this also overstated the prospects for survival for both synchronous and metachronous tumours. This experience suggests, therefore, that the prospects of survival for patients with synchronous or metachronous bilateral breast carcinoma is poor, and worse than might reasonably be anticipated.