Abstract Background The Drosophila brain is an ideal model system to study stem cells, here called neuroblasts, and the generation of neural lineages. Many transcriptional activators are involved in formation of the brain during the development of Drosophila melanogaster . The transcription factor Drosophila Retinal homeobox (DRx), a member of the 57B homeobox gene cluster, is also one of these factors for brain development. Results In this study a detailed expression analysis of DRx in different developmental stages was conducted. We show that DRx is expressed in the embryonic brain in the protocerebrum, in the larval brain in the DM and DL lineages, the medulla and the lobula complex and in the central complex of the adult brain. We generated a DRx enhancer trap strain by gene targeting and reintegration of Gal4, which mimics the endogenous expression of DRx. With the help of eight existing enhancer-Gal4 strains and one made by our group, we mapped various enhancers necessary for the expression of DRx during all stages of brain development from the embryo to the adult. We made an analysis of some larger enhancer regions by gene targeting. Deletion of three of these enhancers showing the most prominent expression patterns in the brain resulted in specific temporal and spatial loss of DRx expression in defined brain structures. Conclusion Our data show that DRx is expressed in specific neuroblasts and defined neural lineages and suggest that DRx is another important factor for Drosophila brain development.
ABSTRACT Signaling by the secreted hedgehog, decapentaplegic and wingless proteins organizes the pattern of photoreceptor differentiation within the Drosophila eye imaginal disc; hedgehog and decapentaplegic are required for differentiation to initiate at the posterior margin and progress across the disc, while wingless prevents it from initiating at the lateral margins. Our analysis of these interactions has shown that initiation requires both the presence of decapentaplegic and the absence of wingless, which inhibits photoreceptor differentiation downstream of the reception of the decapentaplegic signal. However, wingless is unable to inhibit differentiation driven by activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. The effect of wingless is subject to regional variations in control, as the anterior margin of the disc is insensitive to wingless inhibition. The eyes absent and eyegone genes encode members of a group of nuclear proteins required to specify the fate of the eye imaginal disc. We show that both eyes absent and eyegone are required for normal activation of decapentaplegic expression at the posterior and lateral margins of the disc, and repression of wingless expression in presumptive retinal tissue. The requirement for eyegone can be alleviated by inhibition of the wingless signaling pathway, suggesting that eyegone promotes eye development primarily by repressing wingless. These results provide a link between the early specification and later differentiation of the eye disc.
We have isolated a cDNA clone, called Dmyd for Drosophila myogenic determination gene, from a 0-16 hour Drosophila embryo library that encodes a protein with structural and functional characteristics similar to the members of the vertebrate MyoD family (Paterson et al 1991). Dmyd encodes a polypeptide of 332 amino acids with 82% identity to MyoD in the 41 amino acids of the putative helix-loop-helix region and 100% identity in the 13 amino acids of the basic domain proposed to contain the essential recognition code for muscle specific gene activation. The gene is unique and maps to 95A/B on the right arm of the third chromosome. Low stringency hybridizations indicate Dmyd is not a member of a multigene family, similar to MyoD in vertebrates. Dmyd is a nuclear protein in Drosophila, consistent with its role as a nuclear gene regulatory factor, and is proposed to be a transiently expressed marker for a unique subset of muscle founder cells. We have used an 8kb promoter fragment from the gene, which contains the first 55 amino acids of the Dmyd protein, joined to lac Z to follow myogenic precursor cells into muscle fibers using antibodies to beta-galactosidase and Dmyd. Unlike the myogenic factors in vertebrate muscle cells, Dmyd appears to be expressed at a much lower level in differentiated Drosophila muscles so it cannot be followed continuously as a muscle marker. This is reflected in the loss of expression of Dmyd RNA in 12-24 hour embryos, a major period of early myogenesis, as well as in the undetectable level of the nuclear antigen in primary cultures of embryonic and adult Drosophila muscle. Functional differences between Dmyd and CMD1 are described and explained in terms of a model which may give insight to the nature of homo and heterodimer formation in the bHLH family of proteins.
In Drosophila melanogaster, the decrease in protein synthesis that accompanies aging is preceded by a decrease in elongation factor EF-1 alpha protein and mRNA. Here we show that Drosophila transformed with a P-element vector containing an EF-1 alpha gene under control of hsp70 regulatory sequences have a longer life-span than control flies.
Abstract An induction process occurring between the mesodermal and the endodermal germ layers has recently been described in the regulation of the Drosophila homeotic gene labial (lab). We report here that proper spatial regulation of the Drosophila POU box gene pdm-1 products also involves interaction between these two germ layers. pdm-1 transcripts are initially present in both the anterior and the posterior endodermal midgut primordia. Upon fusion of the two primordia, transcripts disappear from two regions in the endoderm, a central domain and an anterior domain. The anterior repression domain of pdm-1 is independent of the expression of known homeotic genes and genes encoding secreted signalling molecules in the visceral mesoderm, both for its positioning and its repression. Repression in the central domain requires both the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and the decapentaplegic (dpp) gene, which encodes a secreted protein. Both of these genes are also required for lab induction. However, the analysis of pdm-1 expression in various mutant backgrounds indicates that the regulation of lab and pdm-1 across germ layers is controlled by different genetic cascades. Our study indicates that dpp is not the signal that dictates central pdm-1 repression across germ layers and suggests that in the same midgut region, different signalling pathways result in the differential activation or repression of potential transcription factors.
Screening a cDNA library of 2- to 3-day-old flies with poly(A) + RNA from male and female flies, we were able to isolate a small number of clones hybridizing preferentially with RNA from female flies. Four cDNA clones, derived from a single mRNA species, proved to be highly abundant in female flies. When we screened a genomic library with the longest cDNA, we obtained two genomic clones, F1 and F2 ; F1 was a direct copy of the cDNA and F2 was obtained by cross-hybridization. A detailed analysis of these genomic clones revealed two independent genes coding for proteins of 50 kDa that are >90% homologous. RNA analysis with gene-specific probes from the 3′ untranslated region showed an expression of F1 in all stages of development with a 5- to 10-fold overexpression of this RNA in female flies compared with males. In contrast to F1, F2 is mainly expressed in late pupae and is expressed only at low levels in adult flies.
