We have studied the effects of both hypertension and streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus on α1-adrenoceptor mediated vasoconstriction, endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation. The experiments were performed in perfused mesenteric vascular bed preparations taken from age-matched SHR, WKY, diabetic SHR and diabetic WKY. For the α1-adrenoceptor agonist methoxamine, the mesenteric preparations from SHR and diabetic SHR yielded significantly (p < 0.05) stronger maximal responses than preparations taken from WKY and diabetic WKY, respectively. The diabetic state significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the responsiveness to methoxamine in arteries from SHR and WKY. Hypertension does not significantly change the concentration response-curves for (acetyl-β) methacholine, histamine, adenosine diphosphate and sodium-nitroprusside. However, the sensitivity to endothelium-dependent vasodilation decreased in preparations from diabetic animals (< 0.05). It is concluded that mesenteric resistance arteries from SHR and diabetic SHR are more reactive to α1-adrenoceptor stimulation, whereas diabetes reduces the responsiveness to methoxamine in WKY and SHR. Hypertension does not affect the endothelium-dependent relaxation in mesenteric arteries. However, diabetes decreases the sensitivity to endothelium-dependent relaxation without altering the sensitivity to sodium-nitroprusside. These findings are indicative of a diabetes-induced endothelial dysfunction in mesenteric resistance arteries. In preparations from diabetic hypertensive rats the reduced response to methoxamine and the endothelial dysfunction seem to run parallel.
Leaving graduate school and entering the workforce can be intimidating. The competition for postdoctoral fellowships, tenure-track professorships, and research associate positions creates a challenging environment for recent graduates interested in pursuing a career in academia, causing many to consider changing sectors (Cyranoski et al., 2011; Main et al., 2021; Nerad et al., 2022). However, students are often unprepared to make this professional change because graduate programs are typically designed to prepare them for continuing in academic careers, and mentors are often less familiar with career choices in the non-academic world.
We evaluated the antiischemic effects of nifedipine in isolated working rat hearts from age-matched normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY), diabetic WKY, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), and diabetic SHR. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin. First, we constructed concentration-response curves for the negative inotropic effect of nifedipine in every group. After 15 min of pretreatment with nifedipine (EC60), low-flow ischemia (30 min) was induced by reducing the afterload from 51.5 to 11.0 mm Hg and nifedipine was infused simultaneously. The six measured parameters were left ventricular pressure (LVP), maximum rate of pressure increase (+dP/dtmax), maximum rate of pressure decrease (-dP/dtmax), aortic output (AO), coronary flow (CF), and cardiac output (CO), determined after 15-min equilibration in the working heart mode and at the end of the experiment. From these data, the recovery percentages were calculated. There were no significant differences in sensitivity to nifedipine (as measured by the EC50 concentration) between the four groups with respect to LVP, +dP/dtmax, -dP/dtmax, CF, and CO. However, hearts from SHR were less sensitive to nifedipine than those from diabetic SHR and nondiabetic WKY with regard to AO. In isolated hearts from nondiabetic WKY and SHR, there were no significant differences between vehicle-treated organs and nifedipine-treated preparations. In hearts from diabetic WKY and diabetic SHR, however, the nifedipine-treated group (LVP 87.1 +/- 3.3 and 60.5 +/- 12.1%, respectively) recovered significantly (p < 0.05) better from ischemia as compared with the control group (LVP 35.7 +/- 14.7 and 10.7 +/- 9.8%, respectively) (n = 6 for each group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Improving our understanding of how the ocean absorbs carbon dioxide is critical to climate change mitigation efforts. We, a group of early career ocean professionals working in Canada, summarize current research and identify steps forward to improve our understanding of the marine carbon sink in Canadian national and offshore waters. We have compiled an extensive collection of reported surface ocean air–sea carbon dioxide exchange values within each of Canada's three adjacent ocean basins. We review the current understanding of air–sea carbon fluxes and identify major challenges limiting our understanding in the Pacific, the Arctic, and the Atlantic Ocean. We focus on ways of reducing uncertainty to inform Canada's carbon stocktake, establish baselines for marine carbon dioxide removal projects, and support efforts to mitigate and adapt to ocean acidification. Future directions recommended by this group include investing in maturing and building capacity in the use of marine carbon sensors, improving ocean biogeochemical models fit-for-purpose in regional and ocean carbon dioxide removal applications, creating transparent and robust monitoring, verification, and reporting protocols for marine carbon dioxide removal, tailoring community-specific approaches to co-generate knowledge with First Nations, and advancing training opportunities for early career ocean professionals in marine carbon science and technology.
Summary: We evaluated the antiischemic effects of nifedipine in isolated working rat hearts from age-matched normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY), diabetic WKY, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), and diabetic SHR. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin. First, we constructed concentration-response curves for the negative inotropic effect of nifedipine in every group. After 15 min of pretreatment with nifedipine (EC60), low-flow ischemia (30 min) was induced by reducing the afterload from 51.5 to 11.0 mm Hg and nifedipine was infused simultaneously. The six measured parameters were left ventricular pressure (LVP), maximum rate of pressure increase (+ dP/dtmax), maximum rate of pressure decrease (− dP/dtmax), aortic output (AO), coronary flow (CF), and cardiac output (CO), determined after 15-min equilibration in the working heart mode and at the end of the experiment. From these data, the recovery percentages were calculated. There were no significant differences in sensitivity to nifedipine (as measured by the EC50 concentration) between the four groups with respect to LVP, + dP/dtmax, − dP/dtmax, CF, and CO. However, hearts from SHR were less sensitive to nifedipine than those from diabetic SHR and nondiabetic WKY with regard to AO. In isolated hearts from nondiabetic WKY and SHR, there were no significant differences between vehicle-treated organs and nifedipine-treated preparations. In hearts from diabetic WKY and diabetic SHR, however, the nifedipine-treated group (LVP 87.1 ± 3.3 and 60.5 ± 12.1%, respectively) recovered significantly (p < 0.05) better from ischemia as compared with the control group (LVP 35.7 ± 14.7 and 10.7 ± 9.8%, respectively) (n = 6 for each group). Hearts from diabetic rats treated with nifedipine recovered much better from ischemia than did hearts derived from nondiabetic rats.
