Over the past decade, there has been continual improvement in both ablative and surgical technologies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The efficacy of ablative therapy compared to surgical resection for HCC has not been thoroughly evaluated using multiple large-scale randomized controlled trials. By international consensus, if a patient is eligible, surgery is the primary curative treatment option, as it is believed to confer superior oncologic control.to determine the efficacies of percutaneous ablative therapies and surgical resection (SR) in the treatment of HCC. Data sources, study appraisal, and synthesis methods: A meta-analysis using 5 online databases dating back to 1989 with more than 31,000 patients analyzing patient and tumor characteristics, median follow-up, overall survival, and complication rate was performed.Ablative therapies are suitable alternatives to surgical resection in terms of survival and complication rates for comparable patient populations. For the entire length of the study from 1989-2019, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) produced the highest 5-year survival rates (59.6%), followed by microwave ablation (MWA) (50.7%) and surgical resection (SR) (49.9%). In the most recent era from 2006 to 2019, surgical resection has produced the highest 5-year survival rate of 72.8%, followed by RFA at 61.7% and MWA at 50.6%. Conclusions and key findings: Depending on the disease state and comorbidities of the patient, one modality may offer superior overall survival rates over the other available techniques. Interventional ablative methods and surgical resection should be used in conjunction for the successful treatment of small-sized HCC.
32 Background: Trimodality treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery is a standard treatment for esophageal/GEJ (E/GJ) cancers. Following esophagectomy, there is no strong consensus about optimal surveillance and routine imaging. At our institution, patients have surveillance CT scans every 4-6 months for the first 2 years post-surgery and every 6-12 months for the next 3 years. Methods: An IRB-approved chart review was performed identifying patients who underwent surgical resection for locally advanced E/GJ cancer between January 2011 and December 2015 at the University of Rochester. Study objectives were to describe timing of and methods used to detect recurrence as well as their impact on patient outcomes. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were graphed via the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 138 patients underwent surgical resection for E/GJ cancer during the study period: 107 (77.5%) were male, median age was 64, and 116 patients (84.1%) had adenocarcinoma. 111 patients (80.4%) received neoadjuvant CRT. Median OS for entire cohort was 43.4 months. 65 patients (47.1%) relapsed with a median RFS of 19.8 months. Recurrence was detected by routine imaging in 34 patients (52.3%), imaging triggered by symptoms in 25 patients (38.5%), and symptoms alone in 6 patients (9.2%). Median OS post-relapse was 1.5 months when detected based on symptoms alone, 5.0 months when detected by imaging triggered by symptoms, and 13.5 months when detected by routine scans (Log-rank p = 0.046). There were no significant associations between baseline patient /tumor characteristics and subsequent method of recurrence detection. Conclusions: 47.1% of patients suffered relapse after trimodality therapy for E/GJ cancer, consistent with published literature. Almost half of these were detected based on symptoms despite routine imaging. Increased OS for patients with relapse detected by routine scans is likely related to lead time bias, but may be related to increased treatment intensity, or due to less aggressive tumors. Prospective randomized trials are needed to determine the true benefit of regular surveillance scans among esophageal cancer survivors.
Abstract Background: Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) signaling is important in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) biology, but little is known regarding IGF1R expression and patient characteristics and outcomes. Methods: In 365 patients with resected PDAC, we evaluated IGF1R protein expression using IHC on whole-slide sections and IGF1R genomic status using next-generation sequencing. Associations of IGF1R expression, measured by H-scores incorporating staining intensity and proportion of positive tumor cells, with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in 317 and 321 patients, respectively, using Cox regression adjusting for known prognostic factors. Results: Higher IGF1R expression in tumor cells was associated with worse DFS comparing highest versus lowest expression tertiles [median DFS, 10.8 vs. 16.1 months; adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24–2.44; Ptrend = 0.002] and worse OS (median OS, 17.4 vs. 25.8 months; HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.00–1.92; Ptrend = 0.046). The association between high IGF1R expression and reduced DFS was identified primarily among patients with a preoperative body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 (HR, 4.27; 95% CI, 2.03–8.96, comparing extreme tertiles; Pinteraction = 0.032). KRAS-mutant tumors had greater IGF1R expression, and IGF1R expression in tumor epithelium was inversely correlated with that in stromal cells. Mutations in IGF1R were infrequent, and no overt loss-of-function alterations were identified. Higher IGF1R expression was modestly associated with higher gene copy number (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.26, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Higher IGF1R protein expression was associated with worse patient outcomes in resected PDAC. Impact: IGF1R expression in PDAC represents a potential biomarker to guide patient selection for more aggressive, multidrug regimens in the adjuvant setting.
Abstract Background: The pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) microenvironment is characterized by highly abundant stromal fibroblasts that are hypothesized to influence tumor behavior. While recent studies have identified multiple populations of stromal fibroblasts with divergent roles in PDAC biology, stromal composition remains incompletely characterized in human tumors, including the landscape of fibroblast subtypes and their spatial organization. Design: We designed multiplex immunofluorescence assays to quantify tumor cells (cytokeratin), immune cells (CD45), fibroblasts (αSMA, CD74, FAP, LaminA), other cells (CD31, CD56, CALD1, NG2), and collagen I in fixed tissue sections. Combinatorial fibroblast marker expression identified myofibroblasts (myCAF), inflammatory fibroblasts (iCAF), antigen-presenting fibroblasts (apCAF), and other hybrid fibroblast subtypes. We characterized fibroblast populations in up-front resected and neoadjuvant-treated cohorts of patients with localized PDAC and in patients with biopsies of metastatic lesions. Using digital imaging, supervised machine learning, and spatial proximity metrics, we quantified cell phenotypes, fibroblast subtype composition and spatial organization at the single-cell level and in the context of tumor clinicopathologic features and patient outcomes. Results: Across 301 up-front resected tumors, we cumulatively analyzed 1.7 million cells, including 611,000 fibroblasts. Stromal fibroblast density ranged from 632 to 4150 cells/mm2. Five main fibroblast subtypes constituted more than 85% of the fibroblast population in these tumors: αSMA+ (myCAF), FAP+αSMA+ (FAP+ myCAF), LaminA+ (iCAF), αSMA+ LaminA+ (myCAF/iCAF), and FAP+ αSMA+ LaminA+ (FAP+ myCAF/iCAF). Unexpectedly, 39% of fibroblasts showed co-expression of markers previously considered distinct for major fibroblast subtypes. By unsupervised clustering of fibroblast subtype proportions, we identified 3 fibroblast-defined tumor subgroups, including tumors rich in FAP+ fibroblasts, hybrid fibroblasts, and single positive fibroblasts (myCAFs, iCAFs, and apCAFs), which were associated with patient survival. Furthermore, fibroblast subtypes were spatially organized, with preferential localization of FAP+ myCAFs near tumor cells and iCAFs more distant from tumor cells yet closer to immune cells. FAP+ myCAFs were more abundant in basal-like tumors than in classical tumors, and FAP+ myCAFs were located closer to basal-like tumor cells than classical tumor cells within individual tumors. Compared to up-front resected primary tumors, neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treated tumors and metastatic lesions harbored distinct fibroblast profiles. Conclusion: Fibroblasts in the PDAC microenvironment are heterogeneous both in abundance and subtype composition, exhibit distinct spatial organization and are associated with patient outcomes. Treatment with FOLFIRINOX alters the composition of fibroblast subtypes in primary PDAC, and metastatic PDAC lesions have a different fibroblast composition compared to primary tumors. Citation Format: Dalia Elganainy, Andressa Dias Costa, Alexander Jordan, Suryun Kim, Sara A. Väyrynen, Hannah L. Williams, Chen Yuan, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimberly Perez, Harshabad Singh, Richard F. Dunne, Thomas E. Clancy, David C. Linehan, Daniel T. Chang, Aram F. Hezel, Albert C. Koong, Andrew Aguirre, Brian M. Wolpin, Jonathan A. Nowak. Stromal composition, fibroblast heterogeneity and spatial organization in pancreatic adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A035.
10018 Background: CIPN is a dose-limiting toxicity with no established treatments and limited knowledge of risk factors. Exercise during chemotherapy may mitigate CIPN, but it is unknown whether pre-treatment physical activity protects against CIPN. This secondary analysis examines whether physical activity before paclitaxel predicts short- and long-term CIPN symptom severity. Methods: 200 women with non-metastatic breast cancer (52±10 years) receiving paclitaxel with curative intent rated their CIPN (0-10 severity of numbness/tingling in the past week) three times—within 1 week pre-paclitaxel, and within 1 month and 6 months post-paclitaxel. We used linear regression to test whether pre-paclitaxel patient-reported physical activity (Aerobic Center Longitudinal Study) predicted CIPN symptoms (either within 1 month or 6-months post-paclitaxel) controlling for pre-paclitaxel neuropathy, age, BMI, diabetes (yes/no), and cumulative paclitaxel dose. Results: CIPN symptom severity increased significantly from pre- to post-paclitaxel (+3.6 units; p< 0.001) and from pre- to 6-month follow-up (+2.08; p< 0.0001). This is a high level of development of CIPN considering that a 0.5-unit change is clinically significant. Each additional 15 min/day of physical activity pre-paclitaxel was associated significantly less severe CIPN symptoms at post-paclitaxel (-0.5; p= 0.0002) and 6 months follow-up (-0.25; p= 0.09). Each additional 10 years of age was associated with significantly more severe CIPN symptoms at post-paclitaxel (+0.8, p< 0.0001) and 6-month follow-up (+0.9; p< 0.0001) controlling for pre-paclitaxel neuropathy, physical activity, BMI, diabetes, and paclitaxel dose. Conclusions: Breast cancer patients who are more physically active pre-paclitaxel experience less severe CIPN immediately and 6 months post-paclitaxel. Physical activity may be especially important for older patients because CIPN severity increases with age. Clinicians prescribing paclitaxel should ask patients about pre-treatment physical activity levels because it may lead to greater treatment tolerability.
Objective Here, we evaluate the contribution of AT-rich interaction domain-containing protein 1A ( ARID1A ), the most frequently mutated member of the SWItch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex, in pancreatic homeostasis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) pathogenesis using mouse models. Design Mice with a targeted deletion of Arid1a in the pancreas by itself and in the context of two common genetic alterations in PDAC, Kras and p53 , were followed longitudinally. Pancreases were examined and analysed for proliferation, response to injury and tumourigenesis. Cancer cell lines derived from these models were analysed for clonogenic, migratory, invasive and transcriptomic changes. Results Arid1a deletion in the pancreas results in progressive acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM), loss of acinar mass, diminished acinar regeneration in response to injury and ductal cell expansion. Mutant Kras cooperates with homozygous deletion of Arid1a , leading to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). Arid1a loss in the context of mutant Kras and p53 leads to shorter tumour latency, with the resulting tumours being poorly differentiated. Cancer cell lines derived from Arid1a -mutant tumours are more mesenchymal, migratory, invasive and capable of anchorage-independent growth; gene expression analysis showed activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stem cell identity pathways that are partially dependent on Arid1a loss for dysregulation. Conclusions ARID1A plays a key role in pancreatic acinar homeostasis and response to injury. Furthermore, ARID1A restrains oncogenic KRAS-driven formation of premalignant proliferative IPMN. Arid1a -deficient PDACs are poorly differentiated and have mesenchymal features conferring migratory/invasive and stem-like properties.