In Brief Study Design. Method validation and in vivo motion segment study. Objective. To determine in healthy subjects in vivo intervertebral segmental kinematics and coupled motion behavior in all 3 planes simultaneously for 3 segments and to evaluate whether these results differ from those in the normal population according to the literature. Summary of Background Data. Few studies have provided a direct invasive approach to investigate segmental kinematics in vivo. Dynamic recordings of 3-dimensional segmental motion patterns of adjacent segments have rarely been reported. To date, no studies have examined the 3-dimensional segmental movements of the thoracolumbar junction in vivo in detail. Methods. K-wires were inserted into the Th11, Th12, L1, and L2 spinous processes of 21 healthy subjects. Ultrasound markers and sensors were attached to the k-wires. Real-time motion data were recorded during standardized ranging exercises. Errors caused by the k-wires, and the static and dynamic accuracy of the system, were considered. Results. Large intersubject variation was found in all of the exercises. The average ranges of motion from Th11 to L2 were 18.7° for flexion-extension, 13.5° for one-sided lateral bending, and 1.8° for one-sided axial rotation. Coupled-motion patterns among the subjects showed a coupled flexion in active lateral bending and a coupled extension in active rotation, but the results were inconsistent for active extension and flexion. Conclusion. This method offered accurate multisegmental dynamic-recording facilities. The dynamic exercises showed high reproducibility. The ranges of motion for extension/flexion and lateral bending differed from those reported in previous studies. The coupling patterns were only partly consistent because of large interindividual variation. The measurement error was comparable with that of other invasive methods. The aim of the current study was to determine in healthy subjects in vivo segmental kinematics and coupled motion behavior in all 3 planes simultaneously for 3 segments and to evaluate whether these results differ from those in the normal population according to the literature.
Abstract Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) require close monitoring to achieve the goal of sustained disease remission. Telehealth can facilitate continuous care while relieving scarce healthcare resources. In a mixed-methods proof-of-concept study, we investigated a hybrid telehealth care axSpA pathway in patients with stable disease over 6 months. Patients used a medical app to document disease activity (BASDAI and PtGA bi-weekly, flare questionnaire weekly). To enable a remote ASDAS-CRP (TELE-ASDAS-CRP), patients used a capillary self-sampling device at home. Monitoring results were discussed and a decision was reached via shared decision-making whether a pre-planned 3-month on-site appointment (T3) was necessary. Ten patients completed the study, and eight patients also completed additional telephone interviews. Questionnaire adherence was high; BASDAI (82.3%), flares (74.8%) and all patients successfully completed the TELE-ASDAS-CRP for the T3 evaluation. At T3, 9/10 patients were in remission or low disease activity and all patients declined the offer of an optional T3 on-site appointment. Patient acceptance of all study components was high with a net promoter score (NPS) of +50% (mean NPS 8.8 ± 1.5) for self-sampling, +70% (mean NPS 9.0 ± 1.6) for the electronic questionnaires and +90% for the T3 teleconsultation (mean NPS 9.7 ± 0.6). In interviews, patients reported benefits such as a better overview of their condition, ease of use of telehealth tools, greater autonomy, and, most importantly, travel time savings. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate a hybrid approach to follow-up axSpA patients including self-sampling. The positive results observed in this scalable proof-of-concept study warrant a larger confirmatory study.
Die digitale Transformation des Gesundheitssystems verändert den Beruf des Arztes. Data Literacy wird hierbei als eine der führenden Zukunftskompetenzen erachtet, findet jedoch derzeit weder in den implementierten Curricula des Medizinstudiums noch in den aktuell laufenden Reformprozessen (Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020 und Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog) Beachtung. Der Beitrag möchte zum einen die Aspekte beleuchten, die im Begriff der Data Literacy im medizinischen Kontext gebündelt werden. Zum andern wird ein Lehrkonzept vorgestellt, das Data Literacy im Zeichen der digitalen Transformation erstmals im Medizinstudium abbildet. Das Blended-Learning-Curriculum "Medizin im digitalen Zeitalter" adressiert in 5 Modulen den diversen Transformationsprozess der Medizin von digitaler Kommunikation über Smart Devices und medizinische Apps, Telemedizin, virtuelle/augmentierte und robotische Chirurgie bis hin zu individualisierter Medizin und Big Data. Diese Arbeit stellt Konzept und Erfahrungen der erstmaligen Implementierung des 5. Moduls dar, welches transdisziplinär und integrativ den Aspekt Data Literacy erläutert. Die Evaluation des Kurskonzepts erfolgte sowohl qualitativ als auch quantitativ und demonstriert einen Kompetenzgewinn in den Bereichen Wissen und Fertigkeiten sowie eine differenziertere Haltung nach Kursabschluss. Die curriculare Integration von Data Literacy ist eine transdisziplinäre und longitudinale Aufgabe. Bei der Entwicklung dieser Curricula sollten die hohe Geschwindigkeit des Veränderungsprozesses der digitalen Transformation beachtet und die curriculare Anpassung im Sinne eines Agility by Design bereits bei der Konzeption adressiert werden.
BACKGROUND Telehealth interventions have become increasingly important in health care provision, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Video calls have emerged as a popular and effective method for delivering telehealth services; however, barriers limit the adoption among allied health professionals and nurses. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to identify and map the perceived barriers to the use of video call–based telehealth interventions among allied health professionals and nurses. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed and CINAHL databases on June 22, 2022, and updated on January 3, 2023, following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Only original studies published in English or German since June 2017 that reported barriers to the use of video call–based telehealth interventions were eligible for inclusion. The studies had to involve interviews, focus groups, or questionnaires with physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, audiologists, orthoptists, dieticians, midwives, or nurses. Each publication was coded for basic characteristics, including country, health profession, and target group. Inductive coding was used to identify the patterns, themes, and categories in the data. Individual codings were analyzed and summarized narratively, with similarities and differences in barriers identified across health professions and target groups. RESULTS A total of 56 publications were included in the review, with barriers identified and categorized into 8 main categories and 23 subcategories. The studies were conducted in various countries, predominantly the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, Israel, and India. Questionnaires were the most commonly used evaluation method, with 10,245 health professionals involved. Interviews or focus groups were conducted with 288 health professionals. Most of the included publications focused on specific health care professions, with the highest number addressing barriers for physical therapists, speech and language therapists, and audiologists. The barriers were related to technology issues, practice issues, patient issues, environmental issues, attributions, interpersonal issues, policies and regulations, and administration issues. The most reported barriers included the lack of hands-on experience, unreliable network connection, the lack of technology access, diminished fidelity of observations and poor conditions for visual instructions, the lack of technology skills, and diminished client-practitioner interaction and communication. CONCLUSIONS This review identified key barriers to video call–based telehealth use by allied health professionals and nurses, which can foster the development of stable infrastructure, education, training, guidelines, policies, and support systems to improve telehealth services. Further research is necessary to identify potential solutions to the identified barriers.
Dataset to the publication Inflammation-controlled anti-inflammatory hydrogels Tina Helmecke, Dominik Hahn, Nadine Matzke, Lisa Ferdinand, Lars Franke, Sebastian Kühn, Gunter Fischer, Carsten Werner, Manfred F. Maitz Advanced Science 2022, 2206412. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206412
