137 Background: IBTR after breast conservation encompasses true recurrence (TR) and new primary cancer (NP). No clear criteria distinguish TR from NP, but there is agreement that NP tumors have better outcomes than TR. Prior studies have used distance of IBTR from index cancer (IC), time to IBTR, histological, immunohistochemical (IHC) and genetic differences, but all data are not often available. We have examined IBTR patterns with the goal of identifying the simplest, most robust determinants of outcomes following IBTR. Methods: We reviewed records of breast cancer patients diagnosed with IBTR at the Lynn Sage Breast Center from 8/1992 to 6/2010. Data for the IBTR and IC were reviewed for histology, IHC, location, time between IC and IBTR, follow-up status, and cause of death. Parameters were scored as 1 if IBTR and IC were similar, and 0 if different (location=1 if ≤3cm; IHC=1 if hormone receptors and HER2 similar; interval=1 if ≤ 4 years). Univariate and multivariate proportional hazard models were used to determine impact on overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) and local recurrence (LR). The multivariate model included significant univariate parameters. Results: We identified 161 patients with IBTR and complete data on ≥3 parameters; post-IBTR median follow up was 25 months. Data were missing on location in 13%, histology in 9%, IHC in 26%, and time interval in 0%. In univariate analysis, short interval to IBTR significantly decreased OS (HR 2.56, p=0.04), DSS (HR 4.31, p=0.009), RFS (HR 2.25, p=0.01), DRFS (HR 2.53, p=0.02), LR (HR 2.28, p=0.02); close location of IBTR decreased OS (HR 2.68, p=0.04). Histology and receptor status had no significant impact on the outcomes. Multivariate analysis included time and location, time ≤ 4 years was shown to decrease DSS (HR 4.00, p= 0.04), RFS (HR 2.32, p=0.03) and LR (HR 2.41, p=0.03). Conclusions: A short time interval between IC and IBTR is the most important prognostic parameter; location of IBTR within 3 cm of the IC also increases HR of subsequent events. These are the most easily available parameters when evaluating patients with IBTR, and therefore the most useful for distinction of TR versus new primary.
Infantile myofibromatosis, both solitary and multicentric types, is discussed with emphasis on the importance of diagnosing this condition correctly. Its distinctive clinical and histological characteristics are described, as are the hazards of overhasty and overly ambitious surgical intervention. Other similarly presenting fibromatous diseases of infancy and childhood are discussed, including aplasia cutis, infantile fibrosarcoma, recurring infantile digital fibromatosis, and juvenile aponeurotic fibromatosis. A case of infantile myofibromatosis, solitary type, is reported, and the two surgical procedures carried out over a 4-year period are described. The importance of histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of lesions present during the neonatal period is stressed.
Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype accounting for 15% of all breast cancer cases. It is characterized by larger tumor size, higher grade, early peak of recurrence, and a worse 5-year overall survival rate compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Chemotherapy serves as the backbone for the treatment of metastatic TNBC. Treatment with immunotherapy in combination with Abraxane, a taxane-based chemotherapy, is of benefit only in PD-L1 positive tumors, which represents a minority of the patients. Pelareorep, a proprietary isolate of the unmodified, replication competent reovirus type 3 Dearing (T3D), has been shown to upregulate PD-L1 expression in tumor and inflammatory cells and downregulate intra-tumoral regulatory T-cells in the tumor microenvironment in pre-clinical and early clinical studies. Retifanlimab is a PD-1 inhibitor currently in development. The rationale for this clinical study is that the administration of pelareorep will prime the tumor microenvironment for enhanced tumor response to PD-1 inhibitor retifanlimab.Trial design: This is a phase II multi-site single-arm clinical trial to study the combination of PD-1 inhibitor retifanlimab and the oncolytic virus Pelareorep in metastatic triple negative breast cancer who have progressed on chemotherapy. Eligible patients will receive pelareorep 4.5x1010 TCID50 /day IV, on Days 1, 2, 15 and 16 and retifanlimab 500mg IV on day 3 of every 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patient will be monitored clinically and radiologically for response to treatment. Tumor tissue, stool and blood samples will be collected while on treatment to evaluate changes in PD-L1 expression, gut microbiome and inflammatory cells induced by the study drugs. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04445844) Eligibility criteria: Eligible patients will include premenopausal/postmenopausal women with metastatic TNBC who have previously received 1-2 prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. ECOG PFS 0-2. Specific aims: Primary endpoint will be objective response rate (ORR) and safety, determined by the number, frequency, duration, and severity of AEs using CTCAE v5.0. The secondary end-points will be progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and duration of response (DOR) and quality of life measures using EORTC QLQ-C30. Statistical methods: Simon’s optimal 2-stage design will be used to calculate sample size. In the first stage, 14 patients will be accrued. If there are 1 or fewer responses in these 14 patients, the study will be stopped. Otherwise, 11 additional patients will be accrued for a total of 25. The null hypothesis will be rejected if 4 or more responses are observed in 25 patients. The first 6 patients will be enrolled in a staggering interval for the safety run-in phase of the study. Accrual: The study will enroll up to 25 patients at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Contact information: Mridula George, MD Email: mridula@cinj.rutgers.edu Citation Format: Mridula George, Nicole Williams, Maryam Lustberg, Coral Omene, Nancy Chan, Nisha Ohri, Maria Kowzun, Lindsay Potdevin, Firas Eladoumikdachi, Shicha Kumar, Robert Wesolowski, Grey Wilkinson, Danielle Tang, Sinae Kim, Shridar Ganesan, Bruce Haffty, Deborah Toppmeyer. Irene study: Phase 2 study of incmga00012 (retifanlimab)and the oncolytic virus pelareorep in metastatic triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-32-02.
ABS TRACT Ultrasound and mammogram are two imaging tools used to determine breast cancer diagnosis. One prognostic factor measured by these technologies is tumor size and also can be used in the prediction of recurrence. Which technology offers better determination of diagnosis and gives better measurements of prognostic factors is an ongoing debate among clinicians. Examining the performance of these tools by the association between tumor size and recurrence could depend on the amount and nature of missing data, however. The purpose of this work is two-fold. The first purpose is to determine any relationship between recurrence and tumor size via ultrasound and mammogram by employing complete case analysis. The second purpose involves applying multiple imputation to determine the significance of any indicative associations found in the complete case analyses. In taking these approaches, we aim to show how multiple imputation can aid investigators in further understanding how to discern associations in their data relevant in clinical applications as predicting recurrence.
Importance Cancer screening deficits during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic were found to persist into 2021. Cancer-related deaths over the next decade are projected to increase if these deficits are not addressed. Objective To assess whether participation in a nationwide quality improvement (QI) collaborative, Return-to-Screening, was associated with restoration of cancer screening. Design, Setting, and Participants Accredited cancer programs electively enrolled in this QI study. Project-specific targets were established on the basis of differences in mean monthly screening test volumes (MTVs) between representative prepandemic (September 2019 and January 2020) and pandemic (September 2020 and January 2021) periods to restore prepandemic volumes and achieve a minimum of 10% increase in MTV. Local QI teams implemented evidence-based screening interventions from June to November 2021 (intervention period), iteratively adjusting interventions according to their MTVs and target. Interrupted time series analyses was used to identify the intervention effect. Data analysis was performed from January to April 2022. Exposures Collaborative QI support included provision of a Return-to-Screening plan-do-study-act protocol, evidence-based screening interventions, QI education, programmatic coordination, and calculation of screening deficits and targets. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the proportion of QI projects reaching target MTV and counterfactual differences in the aggregate number of screening tests across time periods. Results Of 859 cancer screening QI projects (452 for breast cancer, 134 for colorectal cancer, 244 for lung cancer, and 29 for cervical cancer) conducted by 786 accredited cancer programs, 676 projects (79%) reached their target MTV. There were no hospital characteristics associated with increased likelihood of reaching target MTV except for disease site (lung vs breast, odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.7). During the preintervention period (April to May 2021), there was a decrease in the mean MTV (slope, −13.1 tests per month; 95% CI, −23.1 to −3.2 tests per month). Interventions were associated with a significant immediate (slope, 101.0 tests per month; 95% CI, 49.1 to 153.0 tests per month) and sustained (slope, 36.3 tests per month; 95% CI, 5.3 to 67.3 tests per month) increase in MTVs relative to the preintervention trends. Additional screening tests were performed during the intervention period compared with the prepandemic period (170 748 tests), the pandemic period (210 450 tests), and the preintervention period (722 427 tests). Conclusions and Relevance In this QI study, participation in a national Return-to-Screening collaborative with a multifaceted QI intervention was associated with improvements in cancer screening. Future collaborative QI endeavors leveraging accreditation infrastructure may help address other gaps in cancer care.
Abstract Background: The addition of neoadjuvant platinums to standard chemotherapy regimens for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) improves rates of pathologic complete response (pCR). Our prior trial combining carboplatin (CAR) with liposomal doxorubicin (DOX) for metastatic TNBC showed good response rates with minimal side effects and allows for higher platinum dosing. We hypothesized that the doublet of DOX+CAR is effective and tolerable in the neoadjuvant setting for TNBC and tumor genomics may identify biomarkers of complete response and actionable targets. Methods: A phase II single arm trial was conducted for patients (pts) diagnosed with stage II-III TNBC. Patients received 4 cycles of neoadjuvant carboplatin (AUC 5) and liposomal doxorubicin (30mg/m2) administered every 28 days, then underwent definitive breast surgery followed by 12 weeks of adjuvant paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 administered weekly. Primary and secondary clinical endpoints were rate of pCR and two year recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively. Cardiac safety of the combination was assessed. Fresh residual tumor samples were obtained at time of surgery for generation of patient derived xenografts (PDX). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing will be performed to evaluate specific patterns of small-variant mutations and patterns of structural variants to identify which patients are likely to have pCR. Results: From 2/2015 to 6/2021, 62 pts were enrolled, 8 pts withdrew consent either prior to treatment or completion of neoadjuvant therapy and/or surgery. Median age of the cohort was 55.4 years. There was high participation by under-represented groups: 17.0% African American, 20.8% Asian, 13.2% Hispanic. Most histologies were invasive ductal carcinoma, but included apocrine, pleomorphic lobular, and metaplastic subtypes. 53 pts completed all 4 cycles of neoadjuvant DOX+CAR, followed by definitive surgery; 1 pt progressed after 1 cycle and proceeded to surgery thereafter. 30.2% (16) pts achieved pCR, and residual cancer burden (RCB) will be reported in patients with residual disease. Of the 53 pts who completed 4 cycles of treatment, 5 pts progressed (recurrence or death) within two years from time of surgery (4 distant and 1 local recurrence), yielding the 2-year recurrence-free-survival rate of 90.3% (95%CI 81.0%, 99.6%). The most common toxicities during DOX+CAR were grade 1 fatigue in 50 pts (92.6%), grade 1 anemia in 44 pts (81.5%), and grade 3/4 neutropenia in 16 pts (29.6%); these pts received GCSF support with subsequent cycles; febrile neutropenia occurred in 1 pt (1.9%) in this group. Only 10 pts (18.5%) had grade 1 alopecia, 5 pts (9.3%) had grade 2 alopecia, 2 pts (3.7%) had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. There were no delays in treatment due to cardiotoxicity or complications from surgical healing. Of the 37 pts who had residual disease, PDX was attempted in 21 pts, and 16 (76%) PDX were established, including those for 4 patients experiencing recurrence. WGS and RNA sequencing data from pre-treatment and residual disease samples will be analyzed and reported.Conclusion: 4 cycles of neoadjuvant DOX+CAR achieved rate of pCR similar to standard regimens and has good tolerability. Post chemotherapy PDX is feasible and may help identify targeted approaches for patients with resistant disease. These results warrant further evaluation of this combination for early stage TNBC. Citation Format: Nancy Chan, Shou-en Lu, Yue Wang, Gregory M Riedlinger, Coral Omene, Mridula George, Jyoti Malhotra, Maria Kowzun, Firas G Eladoumikdachi, Lindsay B Potdevin, Shicha Kumar, Kant Matsuda, Shruti Desai, Nayana Patel, Deborah L Toppmeyer, Shridar Ganesan, Kim Hirshfield. Neoadjuvant liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin is effective and tolerable for the treatment of early stage triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-15.
