To determine the antitumor activity and safety of a combination of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), intermediate-dose cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (MIDAM) in patients with refractory or relapsed CD33(+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML).We treated 62 patients with refractory (n = 18) or relapsed (n = 44) CD33(+) AML. Median age was 55.5 years. Salvage regimen consisted of GO 9 mg/m(2) on day 4, cytarabine 1 g/m(2) every 12 hours on days 1 through 5, and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 through 3. Median follow-up time was 26.5 months.Thirty-one patients (50%) achieved complete remission (CR), and eight patients (13%) had CR with delayed platelet recovery (CRp); the overall response (OR; CR + CRp) rate was 63%. A significantly higher OR rate was achieved in patients who had relapsed versus refractory AML (73% v 39%, respectively; P = .007) and patients with CD33 expression more than 98% of the blast population versus less than 98% (79% v 52.3%, respectively; P = .03). The overall, event-free, and disease-free survival rates were 41%, 33%, and 53% at 2 years, respectively. Leukocytosis more than 20,000/microL at MIDAM therapy, high-risk cytogenetics, and absence of postremission therapy were adverse prognostic factors. Age, disease status, and/or CD33 expression did not influence survival parameters. Four early toxic deaths occurred; a grade 3 to 4 hyperbilirubinemia rate of 16% was observed, and two patients had veno-occlusive disease (3%).The MIDAM regimen seems to be an effective salvage regimen for refractory/relapsed CD33(+) AML patients. These encouraging results support the need for a randomized phase III trial before considering this combination of GO and chemotherapy as superior or the standard of care treatment for refractory/relapsed CD33(+) AML patients.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients has a poor prognosis. In an attempt to improve outcome for these patients, the prospective open-label phase III LAM-SA 2007 (Adding Lomustine to Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), and Allogeneic Transplantation for Patients From 60 to 65 Years Old) trial randomly assigned patients to a standard induction regimen with lomustine added or to a consolidation regimen with cytarabine and idarubicin.Adults age 60 years or older with previously untreated AML who were fit to receive intensive chemotherapy and who were without unfavorable cytogenetics received standard chemotherapy with lomustine (idarubicin, cytarabine, and lomustine [ICL]) or without (idarubicin and cytarabine [IC]). The primary objective of the study was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives were response rate, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), event-free survival (EFS), and safety.From February 2008 to December 2011, 459 patients were enrolled. Comparing patients in the IC and ICL arms, complete response or complete response with incomplete recovery was achieved in 74.9% versus 84.7% (P = .01). The proportional hazards assumption was rejected for OS (P = .02), which led us to consider two separate time intervals: during and after induction. There was no significant difference between the two arms during induction, although induction deaths were 3.7% versus 7.7%, respectively (P = .11). However, significantly better results were observed after induction with an improved 2-year OS of 56% in the ICL arm versus 48% in the IC arm (P = .02). At 2 years, EFS was improved at 41% in the ICL arm versus 26% in the IC arm (P = .01). The CIR at 2 years was 41.2% in the ICL arm versus 60.9% in the IC arm (P = .003). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities, mostly hematologic, were significantly higher in the ICL arm (P = .04), and fewer patients required a second treatment after ICL.Adding lomustine to standard chemotherapy significantly improved the outcome of elderly patients with AML.
To improve the results in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients, different strategies have been proposed. The intensification could concern the induction and early consolidation phases, the conditioning regimen before allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT), or both. We analyzed 2 consecutive trials for adult patients in first remission and with the same prognostic features. The Leucemie Aigue Lymphoblastique Paris-Ouest-France (LALPOF) protocol proposed alloBMT with standard conditioning after a classic induction and intensified consolidation scheme; the Groupe Ouest Est des Leucemies Aigues Lymphoblastiques (GOLEAL1) protocol tested an intensified induction and consolidation course before alloBMT with a reinforced conditioning regimen. The 4-year survival rates after alloBMT for LALPOF and GOELAL1 were, respectively, 71% +/- 12% and 36% +/- 13% ( P = .009). The 4-year disease-free survival reached 75% +/- 11% in the LALPOF study and 69% +/- 13% in the GOELAL1 study ( P = .30). The toxic death rate was significantly lower in the LALPOF (2/18) than in the GOELAL1 (6/15) group. Event-free survival at 4 years was significantly higher in LALPOF than in GOELAL1: 66% +/- 11% and 35% +/- 11%, respectively ( P = .02). For adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients in first remission, the intensification of chemotherapy before a reinforced conditioning regimen before alloBMT may lead to an increased toxic death rate.
Oncogenic alterations underlying B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in adults remain incompletely elucidated. To uncover novel oncogenic drivers, we performed RNA sequencing and whole-genome analyses in a large cohort of unresolved B-ALL. We identified a novel subtype characterized by a distinct gene expression signature and the unique association of 2 genomic microdeletions. The 17q21.31 microdeletion resulted in a UBTF::ATXN7L3 fusion transcript encoding a chimeric protein. The 13q12.2 deletion resulted in monoallelic ectopic expression of the homeobox transcription factor CDX2, located 138 kb in cis from the deletion. Using 4C-sequencing and CRISPR interference experiments, we elucidated the mechanism of CDX2 cis-deregulation, involving PAN3 enhancer hijacking. CDX2/UBTF ALL (n = 26) harbored a distinct pattern of additional alterations including 1q gain and CXCR4 activating mutations. Within adult patients with Ph- B-ALL enrolled in GRAALL trials, patients with CDX2/UBTF ALL (n = 17/723, 2.4%) were young (median age, 31 years) and dramatically enriched in females (male/female ratio, 0.2, P = .002). They commonly presented with a pro-B phenotype ALL and moderate blast cell infiltration. They had poor response to treatment including a higher risk of failure to first induction course (19% vs 3%, P = .017) and higher post-induction minimal residual disease (MRD) levels (MRD ≥ 10-4, 93% vs 46%, P < .001). This early resistance to treatment translated into a significantly higher cumulative incidence of relapse (75.0% vs 32.4%, P = .004) in univariate and multivariate analyses. In conclusion, we discovered a novel B-ALL entity defined by the unique combination of CDX2 cis-deregulation and UBTF::ATXN7L3 fusion, representing a high-risk disease in young adults.
Abstract Background Recently, the combination of venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent (HMA; azacitidine ordecitabine) or low‐dose cytarabine (LDAC) showed promise in Phase III trials in previously untreated AML. In France at the time of this study, venetoclax was not yet approved for AML and there were therefore no formal usage recommendations. Here we report the first study in a French cohort that assessed venetoclax in combination with existing treatments for AML under real‐life conditions. Method This retrospective, real‐life study collected data on venetoclax use and management in a French cohort with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Result Of 118 patients, 81 were in second line/beyond (71.6% also hypomethylating agent [HMA]; 23.5% lowdose cytarabine [LDAC]) and 37 in first line. For venetoclax initiation, 57.3% underwent ramp up and 74.6% were hospitalized. Median venetoclax duration was 2.5 months (range 0.03‐16.2). With all treatment lines and regimens, most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hematologic (overall 96.4% of patients) and infections (57.1%). Dosage adjustments for drug interactions and safety varied between centers. In second‐line/beyond, median progression‐free survival was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7‐12.8) with venetoclax‐HMA and 3.4 months (1.3‐8.9) with venetoclax‐LDAC; overall response rate was 51.9% and 41.2%, respectively. Thus, we showed that venetoclax‐based treatment yields promising findings in patients with AML, but to address treatment complexity, practice harmonization is needed.
ABSTRACT Lirilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody designed to block killer inhibitory receptors (KIR), which are major immune checkpoints involved in the regulation of NK cell-mediated killing of HLA-I-expressing tumors. EFFIKIR is a multicenter randomized double-blind 3-arm placebo-controlled phase II trial with lirilumab as single-agent as maintenance therapy of elderly patients with AML in first complete remission ( NCT01687387 ). Two dose schedules led to either continuous or intermittent KIR occupancy. 153 patients were randomized and 152 patients were treated after 3+7 induction therapy. The median follow-up was 36.6 months. Lirilumab was well tolerated, with no significant hematological toxicity. The median LFS were 17.6, 6.7 and 13.9 months in the 0.1mg/kg arm, 1mg/kg arm and placebo arm, respectively. An excess in early relapse led to early termination of treatment in the 1mg/kg arm. Extensive analysis of immune cell fate following KIR blockade evidenced a decrease of KIR + NK cell absolute counts following KIR blockade, associated with a decrease of Bcl-2. Lirilumab also bound antigen-experienced CD8 + T cells, and induced a transient decrease of CD69 expression. Besides, lirilumab bound vδ2 + γδT cells with a high cytotoxic potential, and induced a decrease of DNAM-1 and Bcl-2, the latter being associated with a decrease of KIR + γδT cell, and with a drastic reduction of time to relapse. Overall, the potentially deleterious effects on immune effectors may have resulted in the impairment of immune surveillance associated with an unexpected high rate of early relapse in the group of patients exposed to prolonged full KIR blockade. KEY POINTS Prolonged full KIR blockade leads to potentially deleterious effects on NK cells, CD8 + T cells and vδ2 + γδT cells Combined inhibitory effects of KIR blockade may have resulted in the impairment of immunosurveillance associated with high rate of relapse
