Background/Objectives: The concepts of trust and distrust in health systems during health crises are significantly related to public adoption of health behaviors and health outcomes. The aim of this review is to examine trust and mistrust during times of health crisis, such as periods of viral pandemics and epidemics, and how these concepts relate to public health behaviors and, by extension, affect health outcomes. Methods: A focused search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus using a Boolean expression to identify relevant articles written in the English language and published between 2003 and 2023. The research methods comprised content analysis, thematic analysis, and a word cloud visualization to identify frequent themes related to trust and mistrust in healthcare systems. Results: The analysis included 57 studies and revealed that trust in healthcare systems, institutions, and professionals plays a significant role in shaping public health behaviors during health crises. The study also highlighted how mistrust leads to negative health outcomes, such as increased belief in conspiracy theories, vaccine hesitancy, and non-compliance with public health measures. Conclusions: The review emphasizes the importance of building and maintaining trust in healthcare systems to ensure better public health outcomes during crises. It calls for further research to better understand the nuances of trust and mistrust, aiming to inform public health strategies and interventions that could lead to more effective crisis management and improved health outcomes.
This study aims to identify and compare the prevalence and risk factors associated with psychosocial and psychological complaints, as well as life and study satisfaction, among Greek undergraduate students before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected in two phases: initially, from 2018 to 2019 (pre-COVID), through face-to-face surveys, and later, from October 2020 to June 2021 (COVID period), through online surveys. The study, conducted at Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH) in Greece, utilized a repeated descriptive and comparative cross-sectional design. The sample comprised 540 and 641 undergraduate students during the pre-COVID and COVID period, respectively. The following questionnaires were used: I. A socio-demographic characteristics form, II. Psychosocial Complaints List (PCL), and III. Satisfaction with Life and Studies Scale (SLSS). During the COVID period, there was an increase of 63% in psychosocial complaints (p < 0.001), as indicated by the PCL total, and a 25% decrease in satisfaction with life and studies (p = 0.001), according to the SLSS, compared to the pre-COVID period. Incidences of “suicidal thoughts”, “sexual problems”, and “extreme psychological distress” nearly doubled (61%, 67%, and 104%, respectively) during the pandemic. Females exhibited a 33% increase in the PCL total during the COVID period compared to males (p < 0.001). These findings highlight the profound impact of pandemic-induced changes on students’ mental health and quality of life. Female gender and the pandemic period itself emerged as significant factors influencing these outcomes. Universities should prioritize the development of comprehensive support services to mitigate these adverse effects.
In contrast to extensive research on psychiatric patients' dangerousness, very few studies have examined their victimization.The aim of our study is to record reported victimization of seriously mentally ill outpatients in Greece and compare them with healthy controls.We interviewed 150 severely mentally ill outpatients and a matched group of healthy controls using a semi-structured interview. This recorded incidents of victimization and perceived discrimination during the previous year. Logistic regression models were used to examine the influence of demographic parameters on both victimization and discrimination.In this study 59.3% of patients and 46.0 % of controls (p = .02) reported being victims of a criminal act at least once and 52.0% of patients and 24.0 % of controls (p < .001) reported experiencing discrimination during the previous year. Patients, in comparison to controls, were more likely to report being victims of any kind of victimization (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.07-3.21), of assault/threat (OR = 4.62, 95% CI = (2.32-9.19) and of discrimination (OR = 3.34, 95% CI = (2.1-5.62). In addition, patients reported experiencing higher distress in assault/threat crime compared to controls (p = .03).Patients with serious mental illness are more likely than the general population to report being victims of criminal acts and experiencing discrimination.