Allostery and protein substrate conformational change during GroEL/GroES-mediated protein folding
43
Citation
49
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Keywords:
Chaperonin
GroES
Chaperone (clinical)
Foldase
Folding (DSP implementation)
Conformational change
The chaperonin 60 (Cpn60) is present in all three kingdoms of life and is one of the most conserved proteins in living organisms. The Escherichia coli Cpn60 (GroEL) is the best studied representative of the huge Cpn60 family. It is an essential protein because in conjunction with the chaperonin 10 (Cpn10 or GroES) it forms a protein-folding machine required for correct folding of many proteins and for recycling of misfolded proteins. As many other chaperones, GroEL and GroES are also known as heat-shock proteins (HSPs), since heat stress leads to a strong induction of their expression, a measure to counteract the increase in misfolded proteins as a result of a high nonphysiological temperature. A large amount of literature is available which is dedicated to the elucidation of how protein folding is assisted by this molecular chaperone. However, apart from this primary task, additional so-called 'moonlighting' functions of GroEL proteins unrelated to their folding activity have emerged in the past years. In fact, it becomes apparent that GroEL proteins have diverse functions in particular in mutualistic and pathogenic microorganism-host interactions. In this brief review, we describe some of these recent findings focusing on the importance of GroEL for microorganism-insect interactions.
Chaperonin
GroES
Chaperone (clinical)
Foldase
Folding (DSP implementation)
Cite
Citations (62)
GroES
Chaperonin
Foldase
Chaperone (clinical)
Folding (DSP implementation)
Cite
Citations (14)
GroES
Chaperonin
Foldase
Chaperone (clinical)
Folding (DSP implementation)
Cite
Citations (288)
GroES
Chaperonin
Foldase
Chaperone (clinical)
Cite
Citations (8)
The Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL is an essential molecular chaperone that mediates protein folding in association with its cofactor, GroES. It is widely accepted that GroEL alternates the GroES-sealed folding-active rings during the reaction cycle. In other words, an asymmetric GroEL–GroES complex is formed during the cycle, whereas a symmetric GroEL–(GroES)2 complex is not formed. However, this conventional view has been challenged by the recent reports indicating that such symmetric complexes can be formed in the GroEL–GroES reaction cycle. In this review, we discuss the studies of the symmetric GroEL–(GroES)2 complex, focusing on the molecular mechanism underlying its formation. We also suggest that GroEL can be involved in two types of reaction cycles (asymmetric or symmetric) and the type of cycle used depends on the concentration of non-native substrate proteins.
Chaperonin
Cite
Citations (10)
GroES
Chaperonin
Foldase
Chaperone (clinical)
Folding (DSP implementation)
HSP60
Cite
Citations (57)
The chaperonin GroEL is an essential molecular chaperone that assists protein folding in the cell. ATP-dependent conformational change of GroEL leads to the stable binding of cochaperonin GroES, forming a cage-shaped complex that accommodates a substrate protein to complete the folding. After the elucidation of the outline of the molecular mechanism over the last decade, now we are ready to answer the important questions; how GroEL encapsulate the substrate protein? How the substrate protein influences the functional cycle of GroEL? What is the role of ATP hydrolysis in the GroEL-assisted folding? Is the folding in the GroEL-ES cavity is same as that in the bulk solution? Here I review the recent progress on the GroEL study and discuss the essential role of chaperonin GroEL.
Chaperonin
GroES
Foldase
Chaperone (clinical)
Folding (DSP implementation)
Cite
Citations (1)
A key constraint on the growth of most organisms is the slow and inefficient folding of many essential proteins. To deal with this problem, several diverse families of protein folding machines, known collectively as molecular chaperones, developed early in evolutionary history. The functional role and operational steps of these remarkably complex nanomachines remain subjects of active debate. Here we present evidence that, for the GroEL-GroES chaperonin system, the non-native substrate protein enters the folding cycle on the trans ring of the double-ring GroEL-ATP-GroES complex rather than the ADP-bound complex. The properties of this ATP complex are designed to ensure that non-native substrate protein binds first, followed by ATP and finally GroES. This binding order ensures efficient occupancy of the open GroEL ring and allows for disruption of misfolded structures through two phases of multiaxis unfolding. In this model, repeated cycles of partial unfolding, followed by confinement within the GroEL-GroES chamber, provide the most effective overall mechanism for facilitating the folding of the most stringently dependent GroEL substrate proteins.
GroES
Chaperonin
Foldase
Folding (DSP implementation)
Chaperone (clinical)
Cite
Citations (31)
Chaperonin
GroES
Foldase
Folding (DSP implementation)
Chaperone (clinical)
Cite
Citations (77)
The bacterial chaperonin GroEL functions with its cofactor GroES in assisting the folding of a wide range of proteins in an ATP-dependent manner. GroELGroES constitute one of the main chaperone systems in the Escherichia coli cytoplasm. The chaperonin facilitates protein folding by enclosing substrate proteins in a cage defined by the GroEL cylinder and the GroES cap where folding can take place in a protected environment. The in vivo role of GroEL has recently been elucidated. GroEL is found to interact with 1015% of newly synthesized proteins, with a strong preference for proteins in the molecular weight range of 2060 kDa. A large number of GroEL substrates have been identified and were found to preferentially contain proteins with multiple αβ domains that have α-helices and β-sheets with extensive hydrophobic surfaces. Based on the preferential binding of GroEL to these proteins and structural and biochemical data, a model of substrate recognition by GroEL is proposed. According to this model, binding takes place preferentially between the hydrophobic residues in the apical domains of GroEL and the hydrophobic faces exposed by the β-sheets or α-helices in the αβ domains of protein substrates.Key words: chaperone, folding, binding, hydrophobic interaction, structure.
GroES
Chaperonin
Foldase
Chaperone (clinical)
Folding (DSP implementation)
Cite
Citations (21)