Chemical Depletion of Lower Stratospheric Ozone in the 1992-1993 Northern Winter Vortex
G. L. ManneyL. FroidevauxJ. W. WatersRichard W. ZurekW. G. ReadL. S. ElsonJ. B. KumerJ. L. MergenthalerA. E. RocheA. O’NeillR. S. HarwoodI. MacKenzieRichard Swinbank
9
Citation
0
Reference
20
Related Paper
Abstract:
Satellite observations of ozone and chlorine monoxide in the Arctic lower stratosphere during winter 1992-1993 are compared with observations during other winters, observations of long-lived tracers and the evolution of the polar vortex. Chlorine in the lower stratospheric vortex during February 1993 was mostly in chemically reactive forms.Keywords:
Ozone Depletion
Sudden stratospheric warming
Cite
Abstract In the Arctic winter/spring of 2019/2020, stratospheric temperatures were exceptionally low until early April and the polar vortex was very stable. As a consequence, significant chemical ozone depletion occurred in the Arctic polar vortex in spring 2020. Here, we present simulations using the Chemical Lagrangian Model of the Stratosphere that address the development of chlorine compounds and ozone in the Arctic stratosphere in 2020. The simulation reproduces relevant observations of ozone and chlorine compounds, as shown by comparisons with data from the Microwave Limb Sounder, Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment‐Fourier Transform Spectrometer, balloon‐borne ozone sondes, and the Ozone Monitoring Instrument. Although the concentration of chlorine and bromine compounds in the polar stratosphere has decreased by more than 10% compared to peak values around the year 2000, the meteorological conditions in winter/spring 2019/2020 caused unprecedented ozone depletion. The lowest simulated ozone mixing ratio was about 40 ppbv. Because extremely low ozone mixing ratios were reached in the lower polar stratosphere, chlorine deactivation into HCl occurred as is normally observed in the Antarctic polar vortex. The depletion in partial column ozone in the lower stratosphere (potential temperature from 350 to 600 K, corresponding to about 12–24 km) in the vortex core was calculated to reach 143 Dobson Units, which is more than the ozone loss in 2011 and 2016, the years which —until 2020— had seen the largest Arctic ozone depletion on record.
Ozone Depletion
Microwave Limb Sounder
Polar night
Mixing ratio
Cite
Citations (53)
The Airborne Arctic Stratospheric Expedition (AASE) carried out measurements from Jan. 3 to Feb. 15, 1989. Enhanced levels of chlorine compounds were found in the Arctic stratosphere, and on two single flights ozone decrease of 17% were measured, interpreted as essential features of the Arctic stratosphere, caused by a combined effect of enhanced amounts of chlorine compounds and the presence of polar stratospheric clouds. Related model calculations also indicate extended ozone depletion maximizing in late March 1989 and amount to 5 - 8% in column at 70 degree(s) N. Ground-based ozone measurements, however, show that the most characteristic features during this period are temporal variations and a strong enhancement of ozone, probably due to an extended stratospheric warming. From these measurements it is hard to see any effect of an eventual enhanced burden of stratospheric chlorine, which might show up as an extended and long-lasting decrease of stratospheric ozone, but its eventual existence is masked by the temporal variations.
Ozone Depletion
Cite
Citations (0)
Abstract Recent studies have found a shift of the Arctic stratospheric polar vortex toward Siberia during late winter since 1980, intensifying the zonally asymmetric ozone (ZAO) depletion in the northern middle and high latitudes with a stronger total column ozone decline over Siberia compared with that above other regions at the same latitudes. Using observations and a climate model, this study shows that zonally asymmetric stratospheric ozone depletion gives a significant feedback on the position of the polar vortex and further favors the stratospheric polar vortex shift toward Siberia in February for the period 1980–99. The polar vortex shift is not significant in the experiment forced by zonal mean ozone fields. The February ZAO trend with a stronger ozone decline over Siberia causes a lower temperature over this region than over the other regions at the same latitudes, due to shortwave radiative cooling and dynamical cooling. The combined cooling effects induce an anomalous cyclonic flow over Siberia, corresponding to the polar vortex shift toward Siberia. In addition, the ZAO depletion also increases the meridional gradient of potential vorticity over Siberia, which is favorable for the upward propagation of planetary wave fluxes from the troposphere over this region. Increased horizontal divergence of planetary waves fluxes over the region 60°–75°N, 60°–90°E associated with ZAO changes accelerates the high-latitude zonal westerlies in the middle stratosphere, further enhancing the shift of the stratospheric polar vortex toward Siberia. After 2000, the ZAO trend in February is weaker and induces a smaller polar vortex shift than that in the period 1980–99.
Ozone Depletion
Sudden stratospheric warming
Westerlies
Cite
Citations (15)
Abstract. The 2015/2016 Arctic winter was one of the coldest stratospheric winters in recent years. A stable vortex formed by early December and the early winter was exceptionally cold. Cold pool temperatures dropped below the nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) existence temperature of about 195 K, thus allowing polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) to form. The low temperatures in the polar stratosphere persisted until early March, allowing chlorine activation and catalytic ozone destruction. Satellite observations indicate that sedimentation of PSC particles led to denitrification as well as dehydration of stratospheric layers. Model simulations of the 2015/2016 Arctic winter nudged toward European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) analysis data were performed with the atmospheric chemistry–climate model ECHAM5/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) for the Polar Stratosphere in a Changing Climate (POLSTRACC) campaign. POLSTRACC is a High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO) mission aimed at the investigation of the structure, composition and evolution of the Arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS). The chemical and physical processes involved in Arctic stratospheric ozone depletion, transport and mixing processes in the UTLS at high latitudes, PSCs and cirrus clouds are investigated. In this study, an overview of the chemistry and dynamics of the 2015/2016 Arctic winter as simulated with EMAC is given. Further, chemical–dynamical processes such as denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter are investigated. Comparisons to satellite observations by the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (Aura/MLS) as well as to airborne measurements with the Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere (GLORIA) performed aboard HALO during the POLSTRACC campaign show that the EMAC simulations nudged toward ECMWF analysis generally agree well with observations. We derive a maximum polar stratospheric O3 loss of ∼ 2 ppmv or 117 DU in terms of column ozone in mid-March. The stratosphere was denitrified by about 4–8 ppbv HNO3 and dehydrated by about 0.6–1 ppmv H2O from the middle to the end of February. While ozone loss was quite strong, but not as strong as in 2010/2011, denitrification and dehydration were so far the strongest observed in the Arctic stratosphere in at least the past 10 years.
Microwave Limb Sounder
Ozone Depletion
Reactive nitrogen
Tropopause
Cite
Citations (53)
[1] The Arctic stratospheric winter of 2010/2011 was one of the coldest on record with a large loss of stratospheric ozone. Observations of temperature, ozone, nitric acid, water vapor, nitrous oxide, chlorine nitrate and chlorine monoxide from the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) onboard ENVISAT are compared to calculations with a chemical transport model (CTM). There is overall excellent agreement between the model calculations and MIPAS observations, indicating that the processes of denitrification, chlorine activation and catalytic ozone depletion are sufficiently well represented. Polar vortex integrated ozone loss reaches 120 Dobson Units (DU) by early April 2011. Sensitivity calculations with the CTM give an additional ozone loss of about 25 DU at the end of the winter for a further cooling of the stratosphere by 1 K, showing locally near-complete ozone depletion (remaining ozone <200 ppbv) over a large vertical extent from 16 to 19 km altitude. In the CTM a 1 K cooling approximately counteracts a 10% reduction in stratospheric halogen loading, a halogen reduction that is expected to occur in about 13 years from now. These results indicate that severe ozone depletion like in 2010/2011 or even worse could appear for cold Arctic winters over the next decades if the observed tendency for cold Arctic winters to become colder continues into the future.
Ozone Depletion
Montreal Protocol
Cite
Citations (129)
Sudden stratospheric warming
Ozone Depletion
Cite
Citations (3)
Three recent Arctic winters have been unusually warm or cold compared to the 1979-2001 mean, resulting in either a warm, disturbed vortex or a cold, quiet vortex. Interannual differences n ozone transport in the lower stratospheric Arctic vortex are investigated using data from the Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) III satellite instrument obtained between May 1998 and April 2001. Time series of probability distribution functions (PDFs) of the FOAM data are used to identify seasonal and interannual variations in the transport processes controlling polar ozone. A major warming occurred in December, 1998, that caused the middle stratospheric vortex to be displaced from the pole for nearly a month and dissipate. Ozone transport is inferred from the PDFs and supported by potential vorticity (PV) analyses. The vortex reformed in January, 1999, filled with high O3 air from lower latitudes, which then cooled and descended. As a result, by the end of winter 1999, ozone at 500K in the vortex was 0.5-1.0 ppm higher than in the cold winter of 2000. The winter of 2000-1 had frequent wave disturbances, beginning with a fairly large event in November. However, at the end of this wave activity, the high PV core of the vortex was still intact, and by February, 03 in the vortex looked the same as in 2000. This study demonstrates that interannual variability in the 03-PV relationship can be caused by transport, independent of 03 loss by polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs). Ozone in the vortex in a very disturbed winter does not necessarily represent'pre-PSC' O3 levels in other years.
Ozone Depletion
Sudden stratospheric warming
Arctic oscillation
Cite
Citations (0)
Ozone Depletion
Cite
Citations (0)
Abstract. For the winter 1999/2000 transport of air masses out of the vortex to mid-latitudes and ozone destruction inside and outside the northern polar vortex is studied to quantify the impact of earlier winter (before March) polar ozone destruction on mid-latitude ozone. Nearly 112 000 trajectories are started on 1 December 1999 on 6 different potential temperature levels between 500–600 K and for a subset of these trajectories photo-chemical box-model calculations are performed. We linked a decline of −0.9% of mid-latitude ozone in this layer occurring in January and February 2000 to ozone destruction inside the vortex and successive transport of these air masses to mid-latitudes. Further, the impact of denitrification, PSC-occurrence and anthropogenic chlorine loading on future stratospheric ozone is determined by applying various scenarios. Lower stratospheric temperatures and denitrification were found to play the most important role in the future evolution of polar ozone depletion.
Ozone Depletion
Chemical Transport Model
Middle latitudes
Cite
Citations (4)
Ozone Depletion
Sudden stratospheric warming
Cite
Citations (0)