logo
    Trans-ancestry genome-wide study of depression identifies 697 associations implicating cell types and pharmacotherapies
    Mark J. AdamsFabian StreitXiangrui MengSwapnil AwasthiBrett N. AdeyKarmel W. ChoiV. Kartik ChundruJonathan R. I. ColemanBart FerwerdaJerome C. FooZachary GerringOlga GiannakopoulouPriya GuptaAlisha S. M. HallArvid HarderDavid M. HowardChristopher HübelAlex S. F. KwongDaniel LeveyBrittany L. MitchellGuiyan NiVanessa Kiyomi OtaOliver PainGita A. PathakEva C. SchulteXueyi ShenJackson G. ThorpAlicia WalkerShuyang YaoJian ZengJohan ZvrskovecDag AarslandKy’Era V. ActkinsMazda AdliEsben AgerboMareike AichholzerAllison E. AielloTracy AirThomas D. AlsErik AnderssonTill F. M. AndlauerVolker AroltHelga AskJulia BäckmanSunita BadolaClive BallardKarina BanasikNicholas BassAartjan T.F. BeekmanSíntia BelangeroTim B. BigdeliElisabeth B. BinderOttar BjerkesetGyða BjörnsdóttirSigrid BørteEmma BrännAlice BraunThorsten BrodersenTanja BrücklSøren BrunakMie Topholm BruunMargit BurmeisterPichit BuspavanichJonas Bybjerg‐GrauholmEnda M. ByrneJianwen CaiArchie CampbellMegan L. CampbellAdrián I. CamposEnrique CastelaoJorge A. CervillaBoris ChaumetteChia-Yen ChenHsi‐Chung ChenZhengming ChenSven CichonLucía Colodro‐CondeAnne CorbettElizabeth C. CorfieldBaptiste Couvy‐DuchesneNick CraddockUdo DannlowskiGail DaviesEco J. C. de GeusIan J. DearyFranziska DegenhardtAbbas DehghanJ. Raymond DePauloMichael DeuschleMaria DidriksenKhoa Manh DinhNeşe DirekSrdjan DjurovicAnna R. DochertyKatharina DomschkeJoseph DowsettOle Kristian DrangeErin C. DunnWilliam W. EatonGuðmundur EinarssonThalia C. EleySamar S.M. ElsheikhJan B. EngelmannMichael E. BenrosChristian ErikstrupValentina Escott‐PriceChiara FabbriYu FangSarah FinerJosef FrankRobert C. FreeLinda GalloHe GaoMichael GillMaria GillesFernando S. GoesScott D. GordonJakob GroveDaníel F. GuðbjartssonBlanca GutiérrezTim HahnLynsey S. HallThomas Fritz HansenMagnús HaraldssonCatharina A. HartmanAlexandra HavdahlCaroline HaywardStefanie Heilmann‐HeimbachStefan HermsIan B. HickieHenrik HjalgrimJens Hjerling‐LefflerPer HoffmannGeorg HomuthCarsten HornJouke-Jan HottengaDavid M. HougaardIiris HovattaQin HuangDonald HucksFloris HuiderKaren A. HuntNicholas S. IalongoMarcus IsingErkki IsometsäRick JansenYunxuan JiangIan JonesLisa JonesLina JönssonMasahiro KanaiRobert KarlssonSiegfried KasperKenneth S. KendlerRonald C. KesslerStefan KloiberJames A. KnowlesNastassja KoenJulia KraftHenry R. KranzlerKristi KrebsTheodora Kunovac KallakZoltán KutalikElisa LahtelaMarilyn T. LakeMargit Hørup LarsenEric J. LenzeMelissa LewinsGlyn LewisLiming LiBochao LinKuang LinPenelope A. LindYu‐Li LiuDonald J. MacIntyreDean F. MacKinnonBrion S. MaherWolfgang MaierVictoria S. MarsheGabriela Ariadna Martínez-LevyKoichi MatsudaHamdi MbarekPeter McGuffinSarah E. MedlandSusanne MeinertSusan MikkelsenSusan MikkelsenYuri MilaneschiIona Y. MillwoodEsther MolinaFrancis M. MondimorePreben Bo MortensenBenoit H. MulsantJoonas NaamankaJake M. NajmanMatthias NauckIgor NenadićKasper NielsenIlja M. NoltMerete NordentoftMarkus M. NöthenMette NyegaardMichael O’DonovanÁsmundur OddssonAdrielle M. OliveiraCatherine M. OlsenHögni ÓskarssonSisse Rye OstrowskiMichael J. OwenRichard PackerTeemu PalviainenPedro Mário PanCarlos N. PatoMichele T. PatoNancy L. PedersenOle Birger PedersenWouter J. PeyrotJames B. PotashMartin PreisigMichael PreußJorge QuirozMiguel E. RenteríaCharles F. ReynoldsJohn P. RiceSaori SakaueMarcos SantoroRobert A. SchoeversAndrew J. SchorkThomas G. SchulzeTabea SendJianxin ShiEngilbert SigurðssonKritika SinghGrant SinnamonLea SirignanoOlav B. SmelandDaniel J. SmithTamar SoferErik SørensenSundararajan SrinivasanHreinn StefánssonKari StefanssonPéter StraubMei‐Hsin SuAndré TadićHenning TeismannAlexander TeumerAnita ThaparPippa A. ThomsonLise Wegner ThørnerApostolia TopaloudiShih‐Jen TsaiIoanna TzoulakiGeorge R. UhlAndré G. UitterlindenHenrik UllumDaniel UmbrichtRobert J. UrsanoSandra Van der AuweraAlbert M. van HemertAbirami VeluchamyAlexander ViktorinHenry VölzkeG. Bragi WaltersXiaotong WangAgaz H. WaniMyrna M. WeissmanJürgen WellmannDavid C. WhitemanDerek E. WildmanGonneke WillemsenAlexander T. WilliamsBendik S. WinsvoldStephanie H. WittXiong YingLea ZillichJohn‐Anker ZwartTwenty-Three and Me Research TeamChina Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative GroupEstonian Biobank Research TeamGenes Health Research TeamHUNT All-In PsychiatryThe Biobank Japan ProjectVA Million Veteran ProgramOle A. AndreassenBernhard T. BauneKlaus Peter BergerMarcus DörrAnders D. BørglumGerome BreenNa CaiHilary CoonWilliam CopelandByron CreeseCarlos S. Cruz-FuentesDarina CzamaraLea K. DavisEske M. DerksEnrico DomeniciPaul ElliottAndreas J. ForstnerMicha GawlikJoel GelernterHans J. GrabeSteven P. HamiltonKristian HveemCatherine JohnJaakko KaprioTilo KircherMarie‐Odile KrebsPo‐Hsiu KuoMikael LandénKelli LehtoDouglas F. LevinsonQingqin S. LiKlaus LiebRuth J. F. LoosYi LuSusanne LucaeJurjen J. LuykxHermine H. MaesPatrik K. E. MagnussonHilary C. MartinNicholas G. MartinAndrew McQuillinChristel M. MiddeldorpLili MilaniOle MorsDaniel J. MüllerBertram Müller‐MyhsokYukinori OkadaAlbertine J. OldehinkelSara A. PacigaNicholette D. PalmerPeristera PaschouBrenda W.J.H. PenninxRoy H. PerlisRoseann E. PetersonGiorgio PistisRenato PolimantiDavid J. PorteousDanielle PosthumaJill A. RabinowitzTed Reichborn‐KjennerudAndreas ReifFrances RiceRoland RickenMarcella RietschelMargarita RiveraChristian RückGiovanni Abrahão SalumCatherine SchaeferSrijan SenAlessandro SerrettiAlkistis SkalkidouJordan W. SmollerDan J. SteinFrederike SteinMurray SteinPatrick F. SullivanMartin TesliThorgeir E. ThorgeirssonHenning TiemeierNicholas J. TimpsonMonica UddinRudolf UherDavid A. van HeelKarin J. H. VerweijRobin G. WaltersSylvia Wassertheil‐SmollerJens R. WendlandThomas WergeAeilko H. ZwindermanKaroline KuchenbaeckerNaomi R. WrayStephan RipkeCathryn M. LewisAndrew M. McIntosh
    0
    Citation
    89
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Keywords:
    Genome-wide Association Study
    Depression
    Genetic genealogy
    現在,統合失調症を含んだcommon disease のゲノムワイド相関研究(genome-wide association study:GWAS) が盛んに行われている.統合失調症に関しては,七つのGWAS が施行された.その後,さらに対象を増やしたGWAS のfollow-up 研究も行われた.これらのGWAS とfollow-up により,統合失調症と以下の遺伝子の相関が検出された:1) 12 番染色体上のCACNA1C 遺伝子(P=1.2×10-8),2) 2 番染色体上のZNF804A 遺伝子(P=4.1×10-13).1) は対象数57,213 人,2) は対象数59,949 人で確認された.今後は,GWAS とfollow-up で得られた所見を基に,さらなる研究が進められていくと思われる.
    Genome-wide Association Study
    Genetic Association
    Citations (0)
    <p>Supplemental Figure 1. Quantified genetic ancestry in TCGA participants by self-reported race. Using published ancestry annotations from Carrot-Zhang et al1, quantified genetic ancestry was compared to self-reported race (SRR). For 111/112 TCGA samples used in our study, genetic ancestry consensus was concordant with SRR. Genetic ancestry consensus classification of African or admixed African ancestry captured 100% of TCGA participants who self-identified as “Black or African American”. Genetic ancestry consensus classification of EUR ancestry captured 98.7% of TCGA participants who self-identified as “White”; in one case, a participant that self-identified as White demonstrated a higher proportion of admixed American genetic ancestry. Among TCGA participants who self-identified as Black or African American, the average percentage of African ancestry was 83.2%, which is comparable to the quantified genetic ancestry estimates for the human cell lines used in this study that were classified as African American-derived (average African ancestry of 79.5%). Among TCGA participants who self-identified as White, the average percentage of European ancestry was 96.7%, which is comparable to the quantified genetic ancestry estimates for the human cell lines used in this study that were classified as European American-derived (average European ancestry of 93.0%).</p>
    Genetic genealogy
    Genetic admixture
    Ancestry-informative marker
    White (mutation)
    Abstract In livestock, genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) are usually conducted in a single population (single‐GWAS) with limited sample size and detection power. To enhance the detection power of GWAS, meta‐analysis of GWAS (meta‐GWAS) and mega‐analysis of GWAS (mega‐GWAS) have been proposed to integrate data from multiple populations at the level of summary statistics or individual data, respectively. However, there is a lack of comparison for these different strategies, which makes it difficult to guide the best practice of GWAS integrating data from multiple study populations. To maximize the comparison of different association analysis strategies across multiple populations, we conducted single‐GWAS, meta‐GWAS, and mega‐GWAS for the backfat thickness of 100 kg (BFT_100) and days to 100 kg (DAYS_100) within each of the three commercial pig breeds (Duroc, Yorkshire, and Landrace). Based on controlling the genome inflation factor to one, we calculated corrected p ‐values ( p C ). In Yorkshire, with the largest sample size, mega‐GWAS, meta‐GWAS and single‐GWAS detected 149, 38 and 20 significant SNPs ( p C < 1E‐5) associated with BFT_100, as well as 26, four, and one QTL, respectively. Among them, p C of SNPs from mega‐GWAS was the lowest, followed by meta‐GWAS and single‐GWAS. The correlation of p C among the three GWAS strategies ranged from 0.60 to 0.75 and the correlation of SNP effect values between meta‐GWAS and mega‐GWAS was 0.74, all showing good agreement. Collectively, even though there are differences in the integration of individual data or summary statistics, integrating data from multiple populations is an effective means of genetic argument for complex traits, especially mega‐GWAS versus single‐GWAS.
    Genome-wide Association Study
    Genetic Association
    SNP
    Citations (3)
    Background Alcohol dependence (AD) is a complex psychiatric disorder and a significant public health problem. Twin and family-based studies have consistently estimated its heritability to be approximately 50%, and many studies have sought to identify specific genetic variants associated with susceptibility to AD. These studies have been primarily linkage or candidate gene based and have been mostly unsuccessful in identifying replicable risk loci. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have improved the detection of specific loci associated with complex traits, including AD. However, findings from GWAS explain only a small proportion of phenotypic variance, and alternative methods have been proposed to investigate the associations that do not meet strict genome-wide significance criteria. Methods This review summarizes all published AD GWAS and post-GWAS analyses that have sought to exploit GWAS data to identify AD-associated loci. Results Findings from AD GWAS have been largely inconsistent, with the exception of variants encoding the alcohol-metabolizing enzymes. Analyses of GWAS data that go beyond standard association testing have demonstrated the polygenic nature of AD and the large contribution of common variants to risk, nominating novel genes and pathways for AD susceptibility. Conclusions Findings from AD GWAS and post-GWAS analyses have greatly increased our understanding of the genetic etiology of AD. However, it is clear that larger samples will be necessary to detect loci in addition to those that encode alcohol-metabolizing enzymes, which may only be possible through consortium-based efforts. Post-GWAS approaches to studying the genetic influences on AD are increasingly common and could greatly increase our knowledge of both the genetic architecture of AD and the specific genes and pathways that influence risk.
    Genome-wide Association Study
    Genetic Association
    Missing heritability problem
    Citations (113)
    Abstract Trans-ancestry genetic research promises to improve power to detect genetic signals, fine-mapping resolution, and performances of polygenic risk score (PRS). We here present a large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) which includes 276,020 samples of five ancestral groups. We conducted a trans-ancestry meta-analysis and identified 124 loci ( P < 5 × 10 -8 ), of which 34 were novel. Candidate genes at the novel loci suggested essential roles of the immune system (e.g., TNIP2 and TNFRSF11A ) and joint tissues (e.g., WISP1 ) in RA etiology. Trans-ancestry fine mapping identified putatively causal variants with biological insights (e.g., LEF1 ). Moreover, PRS based on trans-ancestry GWAS outperformed PRS based on single-ancestry GWAS and had comparable performance between European and East Asian populations. Our study provides multiple insights into the etiology of RA and improves genetic predictability of RA.
    Genome-wide Association Study
    Genetic Association
    Genetic genealogy
    Genetic architecture
    Candidate gene
    Citations (14)
    Abstract Most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of major depression (MD) have been conducted in samples of European ancestry. Here we report a multi-ancestry GWAS of MD, adding data from 21 studies with 88,316 MD cases and 902,757 controls to previously reported data from individuals of European ancestry. This includes samples of African (36% of effective sample size), East Asian (26%) and South Asian (6%) ancestry and Hispanic/Latinx participants (32%). The multi-ancestry GWAS identified 190 significantly associated loci, 53 of them novel. For previously reported loci from GWAS in European ancestry the power-adjusted transferability ratio was 0.6 in the Hispanic/Latinx group and 0.3 in each of the other groups. Fine-mapping benefited from additional sample diversity: the number of credible sets with ≤5 variants increased from 3 to 12. A transcriptome-wide association study identified 354 significantly associated genes, 205 of them novel. Mendelian Randomisation showed a bidirectional relationship with BMI exclusively in samples of European ancestry. This first multi-ancestry GWAS of MD demonstrates the importance of large diverse samples for the identification of target genes and putative mechanisms.
    Genome-wide Association Study
    Genetic genealogy
    Genetic Association
    Ancestry-informative marker
    1000 Genomes Project
    Citations (4)
    Полногеномные исследования первичной открытоугольной глаукомы© Н
    Genome-wide Association Study
    Genetic Association
    <p>Supplemental Figure 1. Quantified genetic ancestry in TCGA participants by self-reported race. Using published ancestry annotations from Carrot-Zhang et al1, quantified genetic ancestry was compared to self-reported race (SRR). For 111/112 TCGA samples used in our study, genetic ancestry consensus was concordant with SRR. Genetic ancestry consensus classification of African or admixed African ancestry captured 100% of TCGA participants who self-identified as “Black or African American”. Genetic ancestry consensus classification of EUR ancestry captured 98.7% of TCGA participants who self-identified as “White”; in one case, a participant that self-identified as White demonstrated a higher proportion of admixed American genetic ancestry. Among TCGA participants who self-identified as Black or African American, the average percentage of African ancestry was 83.2%, which is comparable to the quantified genetic ancestry estimates for the human cell lines used in this study that were classified as African American-derived (average African ancestry of 79.5%). Among TCGA participants who self-identified as White, the average percentage of European ancestry was 96.7%, which is comparable to the quantified genetic ancestry estimates for the human cell lines used in this study that were classified as European American-derived (average European ancestry of 93.0%).</p>
    Genetic genealogy
    Genetic admixture
    Ancestry-informative marker
    White (mutation)