logo
    9 Clinical governance of unwarranted variation in hospital care – findings from a regional audit in Norway
    0
    Citation
    0
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Abstract:

    Objectives

    There has been an increasing focus over the past decades on defining, identifying and reducing unwarranted variation in clinical practice. Several attempts to monitor and reduce unwarranted variation in utilization rates and outcomes have shown mixed results. An audit was performed to evaluate the compliance of the regional strategy for reducing unwarranted variation in outcome and utilization rates in the hospitals of South-Eastern Norway Health Authority (HSO).

    Method

    Seventy-five mid- to senior-division and department leaders (level 2 and 3) from 8 hospital trusts in South-Eastern Norway Regional Authority were invited to participate in evaluating the compliance of the regional strategy for reducing unwarranted variation in outcome and utilization rates.

    Results

    The audit revealed that the aim of reducing unwanted variation was not always clearly communicated by senior management. There is varying uses of data from the national quality registers and health atlases for quality improvement. Many clinical leaders experience lack of scrutiny of their work and were insufficiently aware of HSO's top-management and hospital boards strategic expectations on the importance of reducing unwarranted hospital utilization variation.

    Conclusions

    In conclusion, hospital top management and boards should focus on reducing unwarranted variation in hospital outcomes and utilization rates of medical interventions. The hospitals included in the audit need to strengthen their efforts to reduce their unwarranted variation in utilization rates as a key element in improving health care quality and patient safety. We believe that the findings of the audit may be relevant for other healthcare organizations when trying to improve quality and reduce unnecessary interventions.
    Keywords:
    Clinical Governance
    Scrutiny
    Variation (astronomy)
    Clinical audit
    Clinical audit is the component of clinical governance used to assess the quality of care within the NHS. All NHS organizations are required to have a comprehensive programme of quality improvement activity. Clinical audit is defined as ‘the systematic and critical analysis of the quality of clinical care, including the procedures for the diagnosis, treatment and care, the associated use of resources and the resulting outcome and quality of life for the patient’ (National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2002).
    Clinical Governance
    Nice
    Clinical audit
    Excellence
    Foundation (evidence)
    Audit is the process by which clinical staff collectively review, evaluate and improve their clinical practice with the common aim of improving standards. Modern audit has developed from the initial concept promoted in the 1980s and is now part of the concept of clinical governance. Clinical governance is a framework through which health service organizations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services. Clinicians have always been accountable for maintaining high quality care; clinical governance merely imposes structure in this and makes it explicit. The features of this are: (i) full participation in audit by all hospital doctors; (ii) support and use evidence‐based practice, including risk management, quality assurance and clinical effectiveness; and (iii) continuing professional development.
    Clinical Governance
    Clinical audit
    Clinical Practice
    Audits and quality improvement projects are vital aspects of clinical governance and continual service improvement in medicine. In this article we describe the process of clinical audit and quality improvement project. Guidance is also provided on how to design an effective audit and bypass barriers encountered during the process.
    Clinical Governance
    Quality audit
    Clinical audit
    Performance audit
    Clinical audit is a crucial tool for ensuring improvements in the quality of patient care. One of the key components of clinical governance is for all clinicians to participate in clinical audit systems. Clinical audit will provide a comprehensive framework for quality improvement and the monitoring of clinical care using effective information and clinical record systems.
    Clinical Governance
    Clinical audit
    Clinical Practice
    Audit plan
    Information technology audit
    Patient Care
    This article explores the concept of compression bandaging for venous leg ulcer management within the framework of clinical governance. It considers areas, such as clinical evidence, clinical audit, clinical risk-management, quality assurance and professional development, and relates this to everyday practice in the management of venous leg ulcers using compression-bandaging. It acknowledges that the elements of clinical governance are not new to nurses, but provide the relevant information that brings together clinical issues with nursing policy and government directives.
    Clinical Governance
    Clinical audit
    Clinical Practice
    Clinical governance is the centrepiece of the Government's healthcare quality improvement strategy and therefore affects all nurses directly. A key report just published by the National Audit Office (NAO, 2003) shows that some trusts are failing to implement clinical governance properly and are falling down in important areas such as clinical audit and clinical risk management. Many nurses are involved in these areas and are in the position to influence change.
    Clinical Governance
    Clinical audit
    Position (finance)
    Falling (accident)
    Introduction Organisational framework for clinical governance Patient expectations of clinical governance Clinical effectiveness and EBM Clinical audit and clinical governance Clinical risk management Claims management Learning from complaints The role of the medical director Legal aspects of clinical governance Information, data, quality and clinical governance Integrated care and clinical governance Guide to sources Continuous professional development.
    Clinical Governance
    Information governance
    Clinical audit
    Project governance
    Citations (55)
    Clinical audit has been defined as the systematic, critical analysis of the quality of dental care, including the procedures and processes used for diagnosis, intervention and treatment, the use of resources and the resulting outcome and quality of life as assessed by both professionals and patients. The aim of clinical audit is to encourage dentists to self-examine different aspects of their practices, to implement improvements where the need is identified and to reexamine, from time to time, those areas that have been audited to ensure that a high quality of service is being maintained or further improved. Since 1st April 2001, all general dental practitioners (principals and assistants) working in the General Dental Services (GDS) have been required to participate in a rolling programme of at least 15 hours of clinical audit or peer review every three years. The first three-year cycle ended on 31st March 2004. By the end of December 2003, 96% of dentists had either under- taken or committed to undertake clinical audit/peer review activities. This initiative, in conjunction with the voluntary clinical audit and peer review schemes which preceded it, has provided opportunities for dentists and their practices to use these activities to assist in quality improvements in their practices, for the benefit of their patients. However, there are other methods for carrying out clinical audit and, in the NHS, there is a need to link it to clinical governance. This paper gives a progress report on an approach that has been piloted by Southend Primary Care Trust (PCT). It deals with the rationale for the project and outlines the methods used. It does not report results. These will follow in a subsequent paper.
    Clinical Governance
    Clinical audit
    Citations (6)
    Clinical audit is a crucial tool for ensuring improvements in the quality of patient care. One of the key components of clinical governance is for all clinicians to participate in clinical audit systems. Clinical audit will provide a comprehensive framework for quality improvement and the monitoring of clinical care using effective information and clinical record systems.
    Clinical Governance
    Clinical audit
    Information technology audit
    Audit plan
    Quality audit
    Clinical audit received a mixed press when it was formalized as part of the health-care reforms in the early 1990's, and has continued to mixed reviews ever since. However, the latest governmental stipulations on clinical governance envisage a revitalized role for clinical audit. This paper advises on avoiding some of the pitfalls that await the unwary in developing effective clinical audit projects.
    Clinical Governance
    Clinical audit