logo
    Defining Misinformation and Related Terms in Health-Related Literature: Scoping Review (Preprint)
    Ibrahim K El MikatiReem HoteitTarek HarbOla El ZeinThomas PiggottJad MelkiReem A. MustafaElie A. Akl
    0
    Citation
    72
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND Misinformation poses a serious challenge to clinical and policy decision-making in the health field. The COVID-19 pandemic amplified interest in misinformation and related terms and witnessed a proliferation of definitions. OBJECTIVE We aim to assess the definitions of misinformation and related terms used in health-related literature. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of systematic reviews by searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Epistemonikos databases for articles published within the last 5 years up till March 2023. Eligible studies were systematic reviews that stated misinformation or related terms as part of their objectives, conducted a systematic search of at least one database, and reported at least 1 definition for misinformation or related terms. We extracted definitions for the terms misinformation, disinformation, fake news, infodemic, and malinformation. Within each definition, we identified concepts and mapped them across misinformation-related terms. RESULTS We included 41 eligible systematic reviews, out of which 32 (78%) reviews addressed the topic of public health emergencies (including the COVID-19 pandemic) and contained 75 definitions for misinformation and related terms. The definitions consisted of 20 for misinformation, 19 for disinformation, 10 for fake news, 24 for infodemic, and 2 for malinformation. “False/inaccurate/incorrect” was mentioned in 15 of 20 definitions of misinformation, 13 of 19 definitions of disinformation, 5 of 10 definitions of fake news, 6 of 24 definitions of infodemic, and 0 of 2 definitions of malinformation. Infodemic had 19 of 24 definitions addressing “information overload” and malinformation had 2 of 2 definitions with “accurate” and 1 definition “used in the wrong context.” Out of all the definitions, 56 (75%) were referenced from other sources. CONCLUSIONS While the definitions of misinformation and related terms in the health field had inconstancies and variability, they were largely consistent. Inconstancies related to the intentionality in misinformation definitions (7 definitions mention “unintentional,” while 5 definitions have “intentional”). They also related to the content of infodemic (9 definitions mention “valid and invalid info,” while 6 definitions have “false/inaccurate/incorrect”). The inclusion of concepts such as “intentional” may be difficult to operationalize as it is difficult to ascertain one’s intentions. This scoping review has the strength of using a systematic method for retrieving articles but does not cover all definitions in the extant literature outside the field of health. This scoping review of the health literature identified several definitions for misinformation and related terms, which showed variability and included concepts that are difficult to operationalize. Health practitioners need to exert caution before labeling a piece of information as misinformation or any other related term and only do so after ascertaining accurateness and sometimes intentionality. Additional efforts are needed to allow future consensus around clear and operational definitions. CLINICALTRIAL

    Keywords:
    Misinformation
    Disinformation
    Pandemic
    Topics:
    Misinformation and Its Impacts
    Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
    Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
    PDF
    Susceptibility to mis- and disinformation and the effectiveness of fact-checkers: Can misinformation be effectively combated?
    Studies in Communication and Media (2019)
    Michael Hameleers
    The online dissemination of mis- and disinformation may pose vexing problems on democracy. The factual basis of (political) information may be challenged by opposed partisans or issue publics, and misinformation may impact decision-making as confirmation biases may outweigh accuracy motivations. In this setting, fact-checkers that refute the false claims of misinformation may be regarded as an important tool to combat misinformation. Yet, the effectiveness of corrective information may be contingent upon partisan lenses, or the framing used in misinformation. In this study, the effectiveness of fact-checkers that refute different forms of misinformation on the polarizing issue of crime rates related to anti-immigration framing was assessed in the US and Netherlands. The main findings indicate that exposure to fact-checkers can correct misperceptions on immigration, and lowers the credibility of misinformation. Fact-checkers are more effective in the Netherlands than the US. These findings have important ramifications for understanding citizens’ susceptibility to (partisan) misinformation and rebuttals.
    Misinformation
    Disinformation
    Framing (construction)
    False accusation
    Citations (5)
    An Analysis on COVID-19 Disinformation Triangle in Indonesia
    Komunikator (2020)
    Senja YustitiaPanji Dwi Ashrianto
    Misinformation and disinformation are widespread in society, as well as during the outbreak of COVID-19. Much of this information is partly accurate, but the others are not, making it difficult for people to find reliable sources and guides. This study aims to see the tendency of misinformation and disinformation related to COVID-19, which has been fact-checked by Mafindo in January - July 2020 period using quantitative content analysis. The misinformation and disinformation criteria refer to the seven UNESCO types. They were analyzed using the disinformation triangle model by Victoria L. Rubin. The results showed that the highest intensity of COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation was in March, April, and May. Misinformation and disinformation are mostly disseminated through the platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. The types of content that are most widely shared are misleading content, fabricated content, and false context. Besides, personal opinions are also the source of the most common COVID-19 misinformation during January-July 2020.
    Disinformation
    Misinformation
    Pandemic
    Citations (10)
    Misinformation: addressing the challenge
    DELETED (2022)
    Marcia McNutt
    Misinformation and disinformation prevent citizens from making choices that are in their own best interests. While scientists have little influence over the content and regulation of the social media channels that can encourage and amplify mis- and disinformation, there are some interventions from the scientific community that can mitigate the impacts of mis- and disinformation, such as communicating better how scientists build trust in research results and encouraging critical thinking skills.
    Disinformation
    Misinformation
    Fake News
    Citations (1)
    Strengthening scientific credibility in the face of misinformation and disinformation: Viable solutions
    Journal of Controlled Release (2023)
    Hsun‐Yu ChanChi‐Chuan WangWei JengYen‐Ming Huang
    Disinformation
    Misinformation
    Pandemic
    Citations (3)
    Misinformation in the Digital Age
    Monica StephensJessie PoonGordon Kuo Siong Tan
    Utilising a geographic lens to examine the adoption and dissemination of, and attention to ‘fake news’, this timely and important book explores how misinformation in the digital age calls attention to the multiple geographic dimensions of online fictions, conspiracy theories and political disinformation.
    Misinformation
    Disinformation
    Fake News
    Through-the-lens metering
    Citations (2)
    Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda
    Cambridge University Press eBooks (2020)
    Andrew M. GuessBenjamin Lyons
    The research literature on misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda is vast and sprawling. This chapter discusses descriptive research on the supply and availability of misinformation, patterns of exposure and consumption, and what is known about mechanisms behind its spread through networks. It provides a brief overview of the literature on misinformation in political science and psychology, which provides a basis for understanding the phenomena discussed here. It then examines what we know about the effects of misinformation and how it is studied. It concludes with a discussion of gaps in our knowledge and future directions in research in this area.
    Misinformation
    Disinformation
    Consumption
    Citations (156)
    COVID-19 Truths, Lies, and Consequences
    Oxford University Press eBooks (2021)
    Don L. Goldenberg
    Misinformation and disinformation, most often propagated on social media sites, became rampant during the pandemic, contributing to myths and conspiracy theories. Such falsehoods resulted in inappropriate treatments, such as happened with hydoxychloroquine, and has contributed to vaccine hesitancy. Disinformation and political interference in institutions such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) caused confusion for the American public and contributed to the poor pandemic performance in the United States. Anti-vaccine disinformation has interfered with the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Healthcare providers need to take an active role in combating medical misinformation.
    Misinformation
    Disinformation
    Pandemic
    Confusion
    Citations (0)
    Tackling Misinformation and Disinformation in the Context of COVID-19
    Stephanie Alice Baker
    Misinformation and disinformation have emerged as major public issues during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, I analyse how misinformation spreads online, the challenges of combatting misinformation and what interventions can be made to tackle false and misleading advice.
    Misinformation
    Disinformation
    Pandemic
    2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
    False accusation
    Citations (2)
    An Empirically Supported Taxonomy of Misinformation
    IGI Global eBooks (2020)
    Mark ChongMurphy Choy
    Fake news, which includes both disinformation and misinformation, has been a challenge for many countries in the last few years. Disinformation has been present in modern history as part of the tool kit of PSYOPS for the military. Likewise, misinformation has been part of human history for a long time. Hoaxes, rumors, and urban legends—all of which can be classified as differing types of misinformation, although they are not commonly addressed as such—have been exploited by adversarial organizations for their own benefit. This study will propose a comprehensive taxonomy to tackle fake news, disinformation, and misinformation and assess the level of threat they pose to society. A comprehensive comparison with existing typologies will also be included.
    Misinformation
    Disinformation
    Hoax
    Fake News
    Citations (4)
    Subject Guides: Resources for Studying and Teaching the January 6, 2021 U.S. Capitol Insurrection: Understanding "Fake News," Misinformation and Disinformation
    Raya Samet
    Library resources and links for studying and teaching the events which unfolded at the U.S. Capitol building on January 6, 2021. Sources about evaluating news and understanding how misinformation and disinformation works
    Disinformation
    Misinformation
    Fake News
    Citations (0)