logo
    Application of IP102 Dataset in Pest Detection by using Deep Learning Techniques
    1
    Citation
    7
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Citation Trend
    Abstract:
    To ensure high biomass yields and reduce operating risks for farmers, lightning-fast and precise agricultural pest detection is essential. Conventional pest detection techniques, such as manual inspection and visual examination, take a lot of time, require a lot of work, and are prone to human mistake. Deep learning methods have become a potential tool for crop pest identification in recent years. An abstract of a work on agricultural pest identification using deep learning algorithm is presented here. The suggested method employs You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm to evaluate crop photos and accurately detect the presence of pests and their damage patterns. The model can identify pests in real time and notify farmers to immediately implement the necessary pest management measures. The method has the potential with precision of 87% to boost the effectiveness of pest identification and management while decreasing reliance on human labour, improving agricultural yields and enhancing food security. The problems and promise for future development of deep learning-based agricultural pest identification are covered in the paper's conclusion.
    Keywords:
    Identification
    Mistake
    This chapter assesses situations in which one or both parties enter into a contract on the basis of a mistake that is so serious that it negates their consent to a contract; or, it means they did not consent to the agreement in the first place. Following such an ‘operative’ mistake, the contract will be void from the start and therefore treated as though a valid contract never existed. The chapter then considers the law on mistake. It starts with mistakes that prevent the formation of an agreement. The most significant mistake of this type is known as a ‘unilateral mistake’, which is where one party appears to have entered the contract on the basis of a mistake. The next significant issue is known as ‘common mistake’, which is where, at the time of creating the contract, both parties appear to be making the same mistake about the existence of an essential state of affairs. Finally, the chapter addresses the related remedy of equitable rectification before finally turning to the highly exceptional defence of non est factum.
    Mistake
    The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions. Each book includes typical questions, answer plans and suggested answers, author commentary, and other features. This chapter discusses the three broad classifications of mistake: common, mutual and unilateral. In common mistake (sometimes confusingly referred to as mutual mistake) both parties share the same mistake about a fundamental fact of the contract. With mutual mistake the parties are at cross-purposes but neither realizes it. In unilateral mistake only one of the parties is mistaken and the other party either knows of the mistake or possibly is deemed to know.
    Mistake
    The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions. Each book includes typical questions, answer plans and suggested answers, author commentary and other features. This chapter discusses the three broad classifications of mistake: common, mutual and unilateral. In common mistake (sometimes confusingly referred to as mutual mistake) both parties share the same mistake about a fundamental fact of the contract. With mutual mistake the parties are at cross-purposes but neither realizes it. In unilateral mistake only one of the parties is mistaken and the other party either knows of the mistake or possibly is deemed to know.
    Mistake
    The language representative form of correcting mistake in classroom mainly includes the dominant, recessive and compound mistake-corrections, each of which has a certain pragmatic function. Only when teachers make a positive and appropriate use of mistake-correcting method, can their teaching aim be achieved.
    Mistake
    Citations (0)
    Abstract The concept of mistake permeates various areas of private law and performs a similar function in relieving errors in each. This article reviews the operation of the doctrine of mistake in different substantive areas of law, including contract, unjust enrichment and equity, and argues that the similarities in terms of the requirements for establishing a mistake and the role of assumption of risk in negating a mistake should not be overstated. It further argues that the distinction between gifts and bargains, as well as the proprietary consequences of equitable mistakes, makes it premature to postulate a unified doctrine of mistake.
    Mistake
    Equity
    Citations (0)
    Chapter 39 concerns the effect of mistake in contract law. Traditionally, contract law has recognized four categories of mistake: misunderstanding, unilateral mistake, mutual mistake, and mistranscription. The names of these categories fail to describe contractual mistakes according to their functional characteristics, and many of the rules that govern these categories turn on elements that are of only limited functional significance, easy to manipulate, or both. The first step in developing a functional analysis of mistake is to analyze contractual mistakes on the basis of their character. The second step is to analyze the rules that should govern each type of mistake based on policy, morality, and experience. This chapter sets out the general parameter of these analyses.
    Mistake
    This chapter contains sections titled: Mistake #1: Running Out of Money During a Repositioning Mistake #2: Leasing Up Too Soon Mistake #3: Not Using Licensed Contractors Mistake #4: Not Getting Three Bids Mistake #5: Assuming the Lowest Bid is the Best Bid Mistake #6: Not Going after Private Money Sooner Mistake #7: Not Marketing Consistently Mistake #8: Discriminating Mistake #9: Not Having Signing Authority on Bank Accounts Mistake #10: Buying a Property with Environmental Issues Mistake #11: Inspecting the Property Yourself Mistake #12: Managing the Property Yourself Mistake #13: Using Fill-in-the-Blank Legal Forms Mistake #14: Dealing with Tenants Mistake #15: Thinking You Know it All In the Next Chapter
    Mistake
    His study attempts to describe a mistake in doing the students based problems by using the theory newman.This kind of research with a qualitative approach, is descriptive the data collected by providing about based the written material. set of problemsThe subject of this research is a student junior high school class vii.The results of the data in get according to the theory newman students made a mistake classed in some kind of mistake of them read error, a mistake, understand the problems a mistake, transformation a mistake skills, process and a clerical error. final answerStudents who have made a mistake to the process at first would be wrong too when going to keep the next process.If you see from the fact this research can be inferred students most often made a mistake the skills of the process of it is a major influence on the writing of the final answer.
    Mistake
    Citations (0)
    This chapter contains sections titled: Mistake # 1: Thinking Any Investment Is a Good Investment Mistake # 2: Investing Where There's No Real Employment Base Mistake # 3: Being Too Late to the Party Mistake # 4: Neglecting to Go into Every Unit Mistake # 5: Getting Mired in Pollution Problems Mistake # 6: Over-Paying for a Property Mistake # 7: Tying up All Your Money in Only One Market Mistake # 8: Ignoring Overbuilding Mistake # 9: Selling Too Late Mistake # 10: Paying Too Much in Taxes
    Mistake
    Tying
    Investment
    Citations (0)
    This chapter deals with three topics: ‘mistake’, ‘duress’ (physical and economic) and ‘undue influence’ by one party over another. A mistake could be a common mistake, mutual mistake, or a unilateral mistake. A unilateral mistake may be a mistake about the terms of the contract or a mistake as to the identity of one of the parties to the contract. Traditionally a person would act under duress when he was being threatened with death or injury to himself or to his family or friends, or to his freedom. In a more recent development, wrongful or illegitimate threats to a victim's economic interests have also been accepted as a form of duress. The equitable doctrine of undue influence covers a loose group of different types of behaviour, including the use of relationships of trust or personal influence to persuade or bully a vulnerable individual into entering into a disadvantageous contract.
    Mistake