A Better Way to Care for Long Term Care (LTC) residents in Times of Medical Urgency: Improving Acute Care transfers for LTC Residents.
Leanna WyerAbraham MuneneTatiana PenconekShawna ReidEddy LangVivian EwaGreta G. CummingsPatrick McLaneEldon SpackmanPeter FarisMarian GeorgeJayna Holroyd‐Leduc
0
Citation
0
Reference
10
Related Paper
Abstract:
Background: Prior to the pandemic, every day approximately 28 long term care (LTC) residents were transferred to an emergency department (ED) in Alberta. This was placing increasing strain on healthcare resources and potentially negatively impacting the health and wellness of residents (e.g., exposure to iatrogenic harms). Many residents’ conditions could be managed within LTC if appropriate supports were provided. Poor communication between LTC and EDs can also lead to long ED lengths of stay, unnecessary resource utilization, sub-optimal health outcomes, and exposure to iatrogenic harms for LTC residents. Two INTERACT® tools (tools for early identification of acute medical issues) and a new care and referral pathway were implemented to help identify and address changes in health status among LTC residents sooner, improve communication between LTC and ED providers, and reduce unnecessary ED transfers. Methods: Between October 2019 and April 2022, 40 LTC homes and 4 EDs within the Calgary zone implemented the standardized LTC-to-ED care and referral pathway supported by a centralized telephone advice and transfer system for healthcare providers, community paramedics, and two INTERACT® tools (Stop and Watch for healthcare aides; Change in Condition Cards for nursing). Using a randomized stepped-wedge design, the pathway was implemented within 9 cohorts of (4-5) LTC facilities every 3 months, supported by an implementation coach. Three-hour train the trainer implementation sessions were conducted in-person or online with over 325 health practitioners in the enrolled LTC homes using strategies adapted to consider local context and barriers, as well as considering pandemic-related challenges. Evaluation Methods: Evaluation of the intervention involved both qualitative and quantitative methods. The primary study outcome is change in transfers from LTC to ED; secondary (quantitative) outcomes include hospital admissions, utilization of the centralized telephone advice and transfer system, and community paramedic visits. Analysis of these quantitative outcomes utilized negative binomial regression to estimate the incident rate with 95% confidence intervals (per 1000 residents), while adjusting for the different cohorts. The quantitative evaluation also included an economic analysis to determine potential cost savings. Interviews with healthcare providers were conducted to provide context to their experience with the intervention and ways it can be improved. These interviews will be interpreted with the involvement of members of our project resident and family advisory council. Results: Quantitative results demonstrate a reduction in the LTC-to-ED transfer rate [1.70 (95%CI 1.61-1.79) post-intervention) vs 1.91 (95%CI 1.84-2.00) pre-intervention], along with reduction in hospital admission rates [0.94 (95%CI 0.88-1.00) vs 1.08 (95%CI 1.03-1.14)]. There was an increase in utilization of the centralized telephone advice and transfer system [0.18 (95%CI 0.16-0.22) vs. 0.13 (95%CI 0.11-0.16)], but no increase in the number of community paramedic visits [2.05 (95%CI 1.94-2.16) vs 2.50 (95%CI 2.39-2.61)]. Cost and qualitative outcome data is pending. Advice and Lessons Learned: LTC staff education and use of early warning tools for identifying a change in resident health status (INTERACT® tools) and/or utilization of a centralized telephone advice and transfer system may have played a role in reducing ED transfers. We did not observe the expected relationship between community paramedic visits and reduced LTC-to-ED transfers, possibly as a result of the pandemic-related facility outbreak restrictions. Teams should tailor implementation sessions and materials to site specific needs and contexts to help address their unique barriers and facilitators. Partnerships with key stakeholders across the care continuum are essential to ensure adequate support and effective uptake and sustainability of the mutli-faceted change intervention.Keywords:
Acute care
Cite
Citations (0)
Cocaine use
Cite
Citations (25)
Cite
Citations (8)
Triage
Cite
Citations (54)
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread to nearly every continent, with over 2.6 m cases confirmed worldwide. Emergency departments care for a significant number of patients who are under investigation for COVID-19 or are COVID-19-positive. When patients present in the emergency department, there is an increased risk of spreading the virus to other patients and staff. We designed an emergency department telehealth program for patients physically in the emergency department, to reduce exposure and conserve personal protective equipment. While traditional telehealth is designed to be patient-specific and device-independent, our emergency department telehealth program was device-specific and patient-independent. In this article, we describe how we rapidly implemented our emergency department telehealth program, used for 880 min of contact time and 523 patient encounters in a 30-day period, which decreased exposure to COVID-19 and conserved personal protective equipment. We share our challenges, successes and recommendations for designing an emergency department telehealth program, building the technological aspects, and deploying telehealth devices in the emergency department environment. Our recommendations can be adopted by other emergency departments to create and run their own emergency department telehealth initiatives.
Telehealth
Pandemic
Personal Protective Equipment
Cite
Citations (12)
Accident and emergency
Police department
Cite
Citations (0)
Specialty
Acute care
Mental hygiene
Cite
Citations (44)
Polyembolokoilamania in the Emergency Department Polyembolokoilamania is a rare but serious medical condition that involves the presence of multiple foreign bodies in the patient's body [1]. This condition can be challenging to diagnose and manage in the emergency department. In this chapter, we will discuss the presentation, diagnosis, and management of polyembolokoilamania in the emergency department.
Presentation (obstetrics)
Cite
Citations (0)
To the Editor:—We would like to thank Dr. Gordon for his interest in our recent paper.1 We agree with Dr. Gordon that the facilities in their study2 were different than in ours and we did not mean to imply that the institutions or patient populations they described were identical to ours. Because there is such a paucity of information regarding the transfer of patients from long-term care facilities to acute care facilities, we felt it would be useful to include reference to work that was similar to, but not necessarily identical with, ours. We agree with Dr. Gordon that a close affiliation between a long-term care facility and an acute care facility will improve the care of the patients served by such a continuum. We hope similar studies will be conducted to further help in the clarification of the issues important in fostering improved relationships between acute hospitals and long-term care facilities.
Acute care
Continuum of care
Patient Care
Assisted Living Facility
Cite
Citations (0)
A Long-term Care Program was introduced throughout British Columbia, Canada, on January 1, 1978. This comprehensive community-based program emphasizes home care. A longitudinal study was started of all persons (N = 3518) admitted to the program that year in two health districts, one urban and one semirural. An examination of the relationship between acute-care hospitalization and long-term care (LTC) involved determining (1) the number of admissions (N = 364) to LTC directly from acute-care settings versus the number (N = 1287) entering directly from the community, (2) the number of LTC persons who were hospitalized at least once in the first 12 months after admission to LTC, and (3) the outcomes of these hospitalizations. Persons from the urban area who entered the LTC Program from an acute-care hospital were much more likely to be institutionalized than were those from the semirural area. In the LTC facility group, 388 persons (19.9 per cent) experienced at least one acute-care hospitalization during the first year of the program. More than 50 per cent of those transferred to an acute-care hospital for the first time returned to the same location and level of care afterward; 14 per cent died. These descriptive analyses may be of interest to health-care planners and to those who care for the LTC elderly either at home or in a facility.
Acute care
Skilled Nursing Facility
Cite
Citations (21)