Privacy and Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Lifecycle Perspective
3
Citation
11
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
The advent of Generative AI has marked a significant milestone in artificial intelligence, demonstrating remarkable capabilities in generating realistic images, texts, and data patterns. However, these advancements come with heightened concerns over data privacy and copyright infringement, primarily due to the reliance on vast datasets for model training. Traditional approaches like differential privacy, machine unlearning, and data poisoning only offer fragmented solutions to these complex issues. Our paper delves into the multifaceted challenges of privacy and copyright protection within the data lifecycle. We advocate for integrated approaches that combines technical innovation with ethical foresight, holistically addressing these concerns by investigating and devising solutions that are informed by the lifecycle perspective. This work aims to catalyze a broader discussion and inspire concerted efforts towards data privacy and copyright integrity in Generative AI.Keywords:
Futures studies
Differential Privacy
Milestone
Scope (computer science)
Privacy Protection
Cite
Citations (2)
The development of a frontier-free internal market and of the so-called 'information society' have resulted in an increase in the flow of personal data between EU member states. To remove potential obstacles to such transfers, data protection legislation was introduced. One of the underpinning principles of Directive 95/46/EC is the protection of privacy. Yet, the legislation does not provide a conclusive understanding of the terms 'privacy' or 'private' data. Rather, privacy protection is to be achieved through the regulation of the conditions under which personal data may be processed. An assessment of whether, 10 years after the enactment of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998), a coherent understanding of the concept of personal data exists, necessitated an analysis of the decisions in Durant v. FSA ([2003] EWCA Civ 1746) and CSA v. SIC ([2008] 1 WLR 1550, [2008] UKHL 47). Furthermore, in order to examine the effectiveness of the legislation, this article examines whether the term 'personal' is synonymous with the term 'private' data and whether control over processing of personal information protects privacy. By drawing on interviews with privacy and data protection experts, and from the findings of a survey of bloggers, it will be shown that a review of the assumptions and concepts underpinning the legislation is necessary.
Underpinning
Directive
Cite
Citations (1)
Privacy Protection
Cite
Citations (4)
In the information society, in particular in the context of e-commerce, personal data plays a central role. Two different legal concepts, both fundamental rights, are data protection and privacy. The national legislation based on Directive 95/46 is still in force, but it will be replaced by the General Data Protection Regulation, published in Spring 2016. Tijmen Wisman (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) covers this broad area, including data breach notification, cookies, behavioural targetting and data subject rights. Keywords: data protection, privacy, right to be forgotten, behavioural targetting
Directive
Privacy Protection
Cite
Citations (4)
Chapter 8 is a comprehensive overview of EU privacy laws. It includes both the old but still valid Data Protection Directive and the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The second part of the chapter covers data transfer to third states, data retention and the E-Privacy Directive. Privacy, data protection, GDPR, data transfer, data retention, e-privacy
Data retention
Directive
Privacy Protection
Cite
Citations (4)
DECIPHER
Cite
Citations (64)
The quality protection of the fundamental right to privacy cannot be achieved without sufficient protection of personal data. The General Data Protection Regulation provides special rules for the processing of health data as a special category of personal data which is considered to be sensitive by its nature. In this article we aim to investigate the legal regulation for the processing oh health data and to show the connection of this legal regulation with the individual‘s fundamental right to privacy. And vice versa – it‘s important to determine what impact the right to privacy has had on the law of personal data protection. In order to achieve those goals, there will be discussed the origins of the right to privacy and it‘s enshrining into the international and local law. The article will analyze not only the legal regulation of health data protection, but also reveal the connection between individual‘s right to privacy and the personal data protection system.
Right to privacy
Privacy Protection
Cite
Citations (0)
The incentive behind artificial intelligence is to develop computers that can perform complex tasks that could only be performed by humans. One of the embodiments is facial recognition that is utilised in a commercial context to law enforcement. This technology could endanger the fundamental rights of an individual; the right to privacy and the right for personal data protection. The terms privacy and data protection should not be used interchangeably since privacy refers to what extent interferences against an individual can be justified, whereas data protection covers protection against unlawful processing of one’s personal data. In Indonesia, the regulatory frameworks on privacy and data protection are still widely fragmented. European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union have become prime examples for privacy and data protection frameworks. Therefore, this paper uses a doctrinal methodology to analyse the regulatory gaps in the current Indonesian privacy and data protection frameworks, by taking into account the ECHR and GDPR. It can be concluded that facial recognition highlights the pacing problem in Indonesia data governance. There should be exhaustive lists for limitations against interferences on privacy and newly unified regulation on data protection.
Cite
Citations (0)
In the digital age, data privacy protection is facing legal challenges and countermeasures. Traditional privacy protection laws have limitations and cannot fully adapt to the era of big data. The illegal collection and utilization of personal information, the failure to meet ethical standards for privacy protection under new technologies, and the lagging legislative practice of personal information protection are all issues that need to be addressed. This article adopts a series of measures and advocates public awareness to enhance citizens' awareness and participation in personal information protection. From an international perspective, the experience of the EU's "data protection" system is worth learning from, while personal information protection involves basic human rights and should be ensured by legislation. In the future, it is necessary to design a path that balances information freedom and privacy protection, explore technology and incentive paths, industry self-discipline and rights building paths, in order to ensure effective protection of data privacy.
Lagging
Information protection policy
Privacy Protection
Cite
Citations (0)
Data protection and privacy law have never been important as they are today. Data protection and privacy ensure that data is safeguarded from unlawful access by unauthorised third parties and misappropriation of the same. A successful data protection strategy will be helpful to prevent data loss, theft, or corruption of data. It is evident that information and communication technology is developing daily and privacy issues or the threats against personal data of the persons also equally increasing. Responsibility of a government to provide effective privacy and data protection laws/policies cannot be disregarded at any point. Until very recent Sri Lanka did not have a separate legislation to deal with data protection and privacy and it was identified as a major lacuna in our law. At present, in addition to the Personal Data Protection Act No. 09 of 2022 there are several other legislations that may be applied to regulate certain aspects of data protection and privacy. In this research, researcher is aiming to assess whether existing legal framework on data protection and privacy in Sri Lanka is adequate and effective. This will be done by comparing the Sri Lankan legal framework with UK and Singapore, countries that are known as pioneers of data protection and privacy. Ultimate goal of the researcher is to contribute towards assurance of data protection and privacy right of the individuals in Sri Lanka.
Keywords: Data protection, Privacy, Information Communications Technology, Personal data
Misappropriation
Privacy software
Cite
Citations (1)