718: EVOLUTION OF CLINICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AFTER SWITCHING FROM INTRA-VENOUS TO SUBCUTANEOUS INFLIXIMAB IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE : THE REMSWITCH STUDY
Anthony BuissonMaria NachuryMaud ReymondClara YzetPauline WilsLéa PayenLuc ManlayBruno PereiraMathurin Fuméry
1
Citation
0
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
This study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with infliximab describes prospectively the course of (anti)infliximab levels within an infusion cycle to assess at what moment patients develop low/no infliximab trough levels and/or detectable anti-infliximab levels.Infliximab treated RA patients were included in this descriptive open-label cohort study. During one infusion cycle (anti-)infliximab levels were assessed just before and one hour after infusion, and subsequently at 50%, 75% and at the end of the infusion cycle (pre-infusion).27 patients were included. The median infliximab levels decreased from 77.0 mg/l (p25-p75: 65-89) one hour after the infusion to pre-infusion levels of 0.0 mg/l (p25-p75: 0.0-3.1). In 7 (26%) patients pre-infusion anti-infliximab antibodies were detected; these antibodies were already present halfway through the infusion cycle in 5 of the 7 individuals. Patients with detectable pre-infusion anti-infliximab antibodies have significantly more often low/no infliximab levels (< 1 mg/l) halfway trough the infusion cycle (in 5/7 patients) compared to patients without detectable pre-infusion anti-infliximab antibodies (0/20 patients, p < 0.001).Most anti-infliximab forming patients have detectable anti-infliximab antibodies halfway through an infusion cycle, which implies that these patients are exposed to nontherapeutical infliximab levels during more than half of their infusion cycle. As none of the patients without anti-infliximab antibodies had no/low-infliximab levels halfway through the infusion cycle, the presence of pre-infusion anti-infliximab antibodies seems a sensitive and specific predictor for no/low infliximab-levels.
Cite
Citations (41)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Cite
Citations (0)
Crohn’s disease (CD) is an idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease and has no known cure. CD symptoms are treated using an array of medicines, including biological agents such as infliximab. However, infliximab therapy is expensive; therefore, identifying variables that can help predict response to infliximab is worthwhile. The present article reviews the impact of tobacco smoking on the efficacy of infliximab in CD. Earlier studies have speculated that smoking has a negative effect on the response to infliximab in CD, but the current literature is largely unable to identify a significant relationship between the two. Although smoking is known to have a negative effect on the course of CD, as well as other organ systems, presently, a CD patient’s smoking status should not influence treatment decisions regarding infliximab therapy.
Cite
Citations (22)
OBJECTIVES: To review the frequency with which infliximab loses its effect and dose “intensification” is required for Crohn's disease treatment. METHODS: Bibliographical searches were performed in MEDLINE, and European (ECCO) and American (DDW) Congresses. Studies evaluating loss of efficacy and requirement of infliximab dose intensification—defined either as an increase of the infliximab dose (generally from 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg) or as a decrease in the frequency of infusion (to as often as every 4 weeks)—in Crohn's disease patients were included. RESULTS: Sixteen studies evaluating the incidence of loss of response to infliximab in Crohn's disease patients were found. A total of 2,236 patients were included (the majority of them receiving a three-dose induction regimen at weeks 0, 2, and 6, followed by maintenance therapy every 8 weeks), providing 6,284 patient-years of follow-up. The mean percentage of patients with loss of infliximab response was 37%. However, as the follow-up time varied markedly among studies, the risk of losing response to infliximab is better expressed as the incidence of this complication per patient-year of follow-up. Therefore, the annual risk for loss of infliximab response was calculated to be 13% per patient-year. CONCLUSIONS: A variable but relevant proportion of Crohn's disease patients on long-term infliximab treatment lose response. This may be interpreted in two different but compatible ways: a positive view, highlighting that infliximab therapy is relatively durable, with the majority of patients predicted to continue infliximab treatment at least during the first year; or a negative view, interpreting that a significant proportion of Crohn's disease patients—more than 10% per patient-year of infliximab treatment—on long term will lose response and will require an increase in dose and/or decrease in infusion interval.
Regimen
Cite
Citations (645)
Cite
Citations (16)
Abstract Background Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against TNFα, is a drug widely used for the treatment of inflammatory diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, etc.). Therapeutic drug monitoring is currently proposed to provide useful information to clinicians to improve the efficacy of the treatment. Theradiag has just developed the innovative i-TRACKER Infliximab and i-TRACKER Anti-Infliximab kits: fast quantifications of Infliximab and Anti-Infliximab antibodies fully automated on the random access i-TRACK10 chemiluminescent analyser. Methods Analytical performances were assessed using two types of serum samples: human serum spiked with Infliximab or Anti-Infliximab antibodies, and samples from inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with Infliximab (n = 41). On one hand, Infliximab from serum sample was captured by TNFα coupled magnetic microparticles and Anti-Infliximab polyclonal antibodies conjugated to acridinium ester were used for the detection of Infliximab. On the other hand, Anti-Infliximab antibodies were captured according to Infliximab coupled magnetic microparticles and detected with the use of Infliximab conjugated to acridinium ester. Light emission was linked to the quantity of Infliximab, or anti-Infliximab antibodies, presents in the sample. Results Infliximab measurement showed high accuracy (recovery was comprised between 80% and 107%). High precisions were reached for both assays (intra-precision CV were below 8.1% and 2.7% for Infliximab and Anti-Infliximab assays; inter-precision CV were below 11.7% and 4.8% for Infliximab and Anti-Infliximab assays) and no interferences were seen with biologic agents (bilirubin, haemoglobin, lipids, biotin and rheumatoid factors). The dynamic ranges of the assays were 0.3–24 µg/ml for Infliximab quantification and 10–2000 ng/ml for Anti-Infliximab antibodies quantification. i-TRACKER Infliximab and i-TRACKER anti-Infliximab assays were compared with respective LISA-TRACKER assays and showed excellent correlation (R² = 0.94, Slope = 1.04 for Infliximab assay; Spearman’s coefficient correlation was 0.98 for Anti-Infliximab assay). Conclusion i-TRACKER kits are innovative assays which exhibit fast (time to results <40 min), accurate (standardised with NIBSC/WHO international standard Infliximab) and reproducible results for the quantification of princeps and biosimilar molecules (CT-P13, SB2). Excellent agreements were observed with respective LISA-TRACKER assays. i-TRACKER kits are valuable tools for the monitoring of patients treated with Infliximab.
Cite
Citations (4)
Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal anti TNFa whose effectiveness during IBD has been demonstrated especially in Crohn's disease and more recently in the course of ulcerative colitis. However, a significant number of patients estimated to be between 20 to 30% of patients with crohn's disease and 30 to 40% with ulcerative colitis, not responding to treatment with infliximab, thus the failure of infliximab is a real problem which the clinician should resolve quickly. This review aimed to describe predictif factors and mecanique of infliximab failure during MICI treatment and to precise differents therapeutique options.Literature reviewThe definition of failure of infliximab during inflammatory bowel disease is not consensual; it is very varied from one study to another. However, we define two types of non response to infliximab as either primary or secondary. Factors predisposing to failure of infliximab have been reported. Some alternative therapies may be recommended. The sequential treatment comparing to the episodic treatment by infliximab is better in obtaining an endoscopic and clinical response of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The injection of infliximab should be preceded by the taking of immunosuppressive and concomitant use of these during treatment significantly improves the clinical response of patients. Also, the increased time of exposure to infliximab, either by increasing doses or shorter intervals of infusion therapy is a considerable therapy alternative. Moreover, thanks to the advent of new molecular anti TNFa, a relay by adalinumab or certolizumab may be proposed.The failure of infliximab is a common situation but not so easily solved by the clinician. The alternative therapies are aimed at strengthening; improve the action of infliximab or to change the therapeutic molecule. The efficacy of infliximab, being dependent on the rate of infliximab antibody, a therapeutic strategy based on the serum concentration of infliximab is proposed. If the serum concentration is low or undetectable suggesting a high rate of antibody, a change of molecule should be promoted. As if against the serum concentration is high or intermediate, increased time of exposure to infliximab or the addition of immunosuppressive can be proposed.
Concomitant
Cite
Citations (4)
A proportion of patients receiving infliximab have antibodies toward infliximab (ATI), which are associated with increased risk of infusion reaction and reduced response to treatment. We studied the association of infliximab concentration at treatment initiation and development of ATI as well as the association of the presence of ATI and maintenance of infliximab. All patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) receiving infliximab beginning in December 2005 were retrospectively followed until January 2009 or until infliximab discontinuation. Trough serum infliximab and ATI concentrations were measured at each visit. The patients were separated into two groups: ATIpos if ATI were detected at least once during the follow-up period and ATIneg otherwise. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to study the association of infliximab concentration at treatment initiation and the development of ATI. Maintenance of infliximab in the two groups was studied by using Kaplan-Meier curves. We included 108 patients: 17 with RA and 91 with SpA. ATI were detected in 21 patients (19%). The median time to ATI detection after initiation of infliximab was 3.7 months (1.7 to 26.0 months). For both RA and SpA patients, trough infliximab concentration during the initiation period was significantly lower for ATIpos than ATIneg patients. RA patients showed maintenance of infliximab at a median of 19.5 months (5.0 to 31.0 months) and 12.0 months (2.0 to 24.0 months) for ATIneg and ATIpos groups, respectively (P = 0.08). SpA patients showed infliximab maintenance at a median of 16.0 months (3.0 to 34.0 months) and 9.5 months (3.0 to 39.0 months) for ATIneg and ATIpos groups, respectively (P = 0.20). Among SpA patients, those who were being treated concomitantly with methotrexate had a lower risk of developing ATI than patients not taking methotrexate (0 of 14 patients (0%) vs. 25 of 77 patients (32%); P = 0.03). High concentrations of infliximab during treatment initiation reduce the development of ATI, and the absence of ATI may be associated with prolonged maintenance of infliximab. Thus, trough serum infliximab concentration should be monitored early in patients with rheumatic diseases.
Discontinuation
Cite
Citations (156)
To determine whether the need to use doses of infliximab greater than 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks to achieve or maintain clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with differences in baseline clinical characteristics or anti-infliximab antibodies.Baseline clinical characteristics and anti-infliximab levels were evaluated retrospectively in a cohort of 51 consecutive patients with RA treated with infliximab at a single center. Patients were divided into 2 groups for comparison: Group 1 patients achieved and maintained clinical responses with infliximab 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks; Group 2 patients required higher doses.Thirty-two (63%) patients required infliximab dose escalation (Group 2). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline or clinical characteristics between Group 1 and Group 2 patients. Anti-infliximab antibodies occurred in 47% of Group 2 versus 27% of Group 1 patients, with higher anti-infliximab antibody concentrations in Group 2 patients (mean +/- SD: 18.3 +/- 8.9 g/ml vs 7.5 +/- 4.8 g/ml; p = 0.02). Patients who developed anti-infliximab antibodies were younger and receiving less prednisone at the time of infliximab initiation than patients who did not.Finding higher anti-infliximab antibody concentrations in patients who needed dose escalation of infliximab to achieve or maintain clinical responses with lower serum trough levels of infliximab suggests that development of anti-infliximab antibodies may reduce clinical efficacy of infliximab in some patients with RA.
Cite
Citations (102)
Infliximab is effective for the treatment of refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nevertheless, up to 40% of patients lose response to infliximab over time. The aim was to assess the clinical value of measuring infliximab trough levels and antibodies to infliximab (ATI) concentrations in IBD patients who lost response to infliximab therapy.We retrospectively studied records of IBD patients who lost response to infliximab therapy. We first assessed clinical responses of different therapeutic strategies that were applied when patients lost response to infliximab and then we looked at the correlation between clinical response and infliximab trough levels and ATI concentrations.Seventy-six IBD patients were included. 31/76 patients (41%) continued infliximab therapy without any modification, 39 patients (51%) had an intensification of infliximab therapy, five patients (7%) had switched to adalimumab therapy, and one patient (1%) underwent surgery. Clinical response was observed in 27 patients (69%) with an intensification of infliximab therapy. There was no significant difference in mean infliximab trough level at inclusion in patients who responded to intensification of infliximab therapy (3.3 ± 4.1 μg/mL) as compared with patients who did not respond (2.3 ± 2.2 μg/mL, P = 0.85). In all, 16/76 patients (22.4%) presented detectable ATI in the serum. Ten ATI-positive patients had an intensification of infliximab therapy and six (60%) demonstrated a clinical response. After intensification of infliximab therapy the ATI concentration decreased in five patients.In patients with IBD who lose response to infliximab, clinical improvement may occur upon intensification of infliximab therapy, irrespective of infliximab serum concentration or presence of ATI.
Trough level
Cite
Citations (111)