Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
0
Citation
0
Reference
10
Related Paper
Abstract:
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is noninvasive intraductal carcinoma of the breast and is defined as a malignant proliferation of ductal epithelial cells that are confined to the milk ducts. It is a nonobligate precursor of invasive breast cancer, but at present, there is no reliable method of predicting which lesions will invade in a given time frame. Historically, DCIS was an uncommon lesion; however, widespread use of screening mammography has resulted in a significant increase in the rate of detection, and DCIS now accounts for about 20% of all breast cancers in the United States. Current treatment options for DCIS include breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone, BCS with radiotherapy (RT), BCS with endocrine therapy, BCS with both RT and endocrine therapy, mastectomy, and even bilateral mastectomy. There is currently concern about overtreatment of this lesion, but there are no reliable data regarding outcomes without treatment. Although survival is excellent with all standard treatments, local recurrence rates vary widely with various treatment options. Given the variety of options available, the goal of treatment is to tailor the management plan to the individual and optimize the balance of risks and benefits according to the values and priorities of the woman herself. This review contains 10 figures, 6 tables and 54 references. Key words: active surveillance, breast conservation, ductal carcinoma in situ, endocrine therapy, intraductal carcinoma, margins, mastectomy, radiation, recurrence, risk factorsKeywords:
Carcinoma in situ
Breast-conserving surgery
The goal in breast conserving surgery (BCS) of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is removal of the tumor with a clear surgical margin. However, re-excision rates are regrettably high. To date, there are no adequate procedures for intraoperative margin assessment of DCIS. A multicenter, single arm study was conducted to evaluate the benefit of a novel device (MarginProbe®) in intraoperative margin assessment during BCS of DCIS, the associated reduction of re-excisions and the cosmetic outcome of the treated patients. We present results of 42 patients enrolled in 3 German institutions. The device was used as an adjunctive tool to standard of care. The device use was associated with a reduction in re-excision rates by 56%, from 39% to 17% (p = 0.018).
Breast-conserving surgery
Margin (machine learning)
Surgical margin
Cite
Citations (40)
The advent of mammographic breast screening has increased the detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which now accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancer. While symptomatic DCIS has been treated satisfactorily by mastectomy, this may be an overtreatment of smaller screen-detected lesions. Although local excision, with or without radiotherapy, is associated with a significant risk of local recurrence of DCIS or invasive cancer, salvage surgery is usually successful. The long-term breast-specific mortality rate of treatment by mastectomy and local excision are similar. Whereas mastectomy is still appropriate for women with lesions > 30 mm in diameter or centrally placed and for those women who demand the best possible disease-free survival, local surgery should otherwise be considered.
Wide local excision
Carcinoma in situ
Cite
Citations (5)
Wide local excision
Carcinoma in situ
Cite
Citations (5)
Wide local excision
Cite
Citations (223)
Wide local excision
Carcinoma in situ
Cite
Citations (0)
Cite
Citations (33)
The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography to determine the presence and extent of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Retrospective review of medical records of women who underwent MRI and mammographic examination during a 23-month period revealed 39 sites of pure DCIS in 33 breasts of 32 women. No invasive or microinvasive tumor was found. Women ranged in age from 34 to 79 years (mean age 53 years). In these 33 breasts, both MRI and mammography were done before surgery. Reports and images of mammography and MRI were reviewed to determine if each study was positive for the presence of single or multiple sites of DCIS and the imaging patterns associated with these sites. Of 33 breasts involved, DCIS was discovered by MRI alone in 21 (64%), by both MRI and mammography in 8 (24%), and by mammography alone in 1 (3%); in 3 breasts (9%), DCIS was found at mastectomy without findings on mammography or MRI. MRI had significantly higher sensitivity than mammography for DCIS detection (29/33=88% versus 9/33=27%, p<0.00001). Multiple sites of disease were present in five breasts; these were better demonstrated with MRI in three, mammography in one, and equally by both in one. The predominant enhancement pattern of DCIS on MRI was linear/ductal in 18 of 29 breasts (62%); mammography found calcifications associated with DCIS in 8 of 9 (89%). The nuclear grade of DCIS found with MRI and mammography was similar; size of lesions was larger on MRI; breast density did not impact results. In this study, MRI was significantly more sensitive than mammography in DCIS detection. In women with known or suspected DCIS, MRI may have an important role to play in assessing the extent of disease in the breast.
Cite
Citations (208)
To analyze the mammographic and ultrasonographic findings of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and determine the sensitivity in Thai women.Mammograms and bilateral whole-breast ultrasonograms of 37 proven cases of DCIS were reviewed. The former was assessed for microcalcifications and soft tissue densities while the latter was evaluated for masses and thickened ducts. Ultrasonography was used to spot the areas to visualize soft tissue densities in mammogram.Mammography detected 22 cases of DCIS having pure microcalcifications, eight cases with mixed microcalcifications and soft tissue densities, six cases with pure abnormal soft tissue densities and one case showing negative finding. The ultrasonography detected 13 cases showing masses, seven cases as showing thickened ducts and 17 cases as negative findings.Microcalcifications are characteristic findings in mammogram accounting for 81% of DCIS in the present study. Ultrasonography shows abnormalities including mass and thickened duct lesions in 54% of DCIS. The combined modalities can give the detection of abnormalities in 97% of DCIS.
Breast tissue
Microcalcification
Cite
Citations (7)
Carcinoma in situ
Wide local excision
Cite
Citations (10)
Mastectomy has long been a standard option for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). It is preferentially chosen by some women and may be suggested for individuals with recurrent, multifocal, or multicentric disease. We chose to evaluate our recent experience with mastectomy for DCIS. A retrospective review was conducted of 83 patients (87 breasts) from 1995 to 2006 who underwent mastectomy for DCIS. Mastectomy for DCIS was performed in 49 postmenopausal, 33 premenopausal, and one male patient. The average age was 53 years and the mean follow up was 4.5 years. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was performed on 44 cases; positive nodes were identified in two. Intraoperative analyses of SLN were all negative. Only one patient had ipsilateral recurrence of the skin (1.1%). DCIS with microinvasion was noted in 32 per cent of the patients; none of these patients had ipsilateral recurrence. Three patients had positive microscopic margins; none have recurred to date. These results confirm the usefulness of mastectomy for patients with DCIS. We recommend SLN biopsy without intraoperative touch prep analysis. Additional treatment may not be required in patients with microinvasion, positive or close margins because our series shows no local recurrence in these patients.
Cite
Citations (18)