Microaxial Circulatory Support for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sophie A. LeonMelissa A. AustinJake L. RosenDanial AhmadAlec VishnevskyIndranee RajapreyarNicholas RuggieroJ. Eduardo RameJohn W. EntwistleH. Todd MasseyVakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
0
Citation
0
Reference
10
Related Paper
Keywords:
Impella
Ventricular assist devices (VADs) and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) are important tools that provide hemodynamic support to patients in cardiogenic shock. The Impella Recover 2.5 is a percutaneous VAD that provides temporary circulatory support. We report the case of a patient who required the combined support of both an IABP and the Impella device.
Impella
Intra-aortic balloon pump
Cite
Citations (21)
Cardiogenic shock remains a serious complication of acute myocardial infarction as it is associated with very poor prognosis. Despite the historical clinical benefits of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), in some patients additional mechanical cardiac support is necessary. The recent introduction of the percutaneous Impella® 2.5 mechanical circulatory support system (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) represents a major advancement and has been used in these circumstances. Nevertheless, the data supporting the use of this technology alone, after, or in combination with the IABP in patients with cardiogenic shock is limited and the clinical benefits remain unproven. We herein provide an updated comprehensive overview of the literature supporting the use of the Impella 2.5 system compared to the use of IABP in patients with cardiogenic shock. We also discuss the potential role for combination therapy for a patient with refractory shock. We describe a case in which an IABP was used as a bail-out strategy to provide additional haemodynamic support in a patient with refractory cardiogenic shock after the Impella 2.5 system was in place. In selected cases of refractory cardiogenic shock, the use of combined therapy with both the the Impella 2.5 and IABP can provide enhanced circulatory support and could be considered an option to maintain haemodynamic support in these patients.
Impella
Intra-aortic balloon pump
Cite
Citations (19)
Impella
Refractory (planetary science)
Fulminant
Cite
Citations (16)
For patients in cardiogenic shock, several devices can serve as a “bridge,” ie, provide circulatory support and allow the patient to live long enough to recover or to receive a heart transplant or a long-term device. Options include an intraaortic balloon pump, TandemHeart, Impella, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and CentriMag. Which device to use depends on individual patient needs, local expertise, and anatomic and physiologic considerations.
Impella
Cite
Citations (25)
Impella
Cite
Citations (1)
Impella
Cite
Citations (1)
Use of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) in combination with Impella has been described as an alternative strategy for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). We provide a systematic review aimed to explore the effectiveness of this paired MCS approach.
Impella
Intra-aortic balloon pump
Cite
Citations (2)
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not.The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés. Surgical technique for the implantation of mechanicalcirculatory support with the Impella 5.0 pump in a patient with post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
Impella
Cite
Citations (0)
Impella
Cite
Citations (0)