Characteristics of MYC Amplification and Their Association with Clinicopathological and Molecular Factors in Patients with Breast Cancer
Li CaoChongyang RenGuochun ZhangXuerui LiBo ChenKai LiCheukfai LiHsiaopei MokYulei WangLingzhu WenMinghan JiaGuangnan WeiJiali LinNing Liao
4
Citation
42
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
MYC amplification is detected in ∼15% of breast tumors and is associated with poor prognosis by mediating acquired resistance to anticancer therapies. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of MYC amplifications in Chinese women with breast cancer (BRCA) and investigate the correlation between MYC amplification and clinicopathological and molecular characteristics and its clinical implications. We analyzed MYC alterations in tissue specimens from 410 women diagnosed with BRCA in our hospital from June 1, 2017 to September 27, 2018. We compared our results with publicly available data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) BRCA cohort (n = 1079). MYC amplification was identified in 12.4% (51/410) of our cohort, with mean copy number (CN) of 4.42 (range: 2.84-11.27). In TCGA cohort, MYC amplification was identified in 21.2% (229/1079) and was associated with age, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, and molecular subtype, whereas in our cohort, MYC amplification was associated with smaller tumor size (T1-2, p = 0.023) and higher Ki-67 levels (≥20%; p = 0.031). Analysis of molecular profiles revealed that MYC-amplified breast tumors had significantly more concurrent CN variations compared with MYC nonamplified BRCA in both Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH) and TCGA cohorts (p < 0.001). Pathway mapping analysis demonstrated that MYC-amplified tumors had more mutations involved in 15 different but interrelated pathways critical in DNA repair, cell cycle, and cell proliferation. Patients in TCGA cohort with MYC-amplified hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-positive BRCA (p = 0.038) and MYC nonamplified triple-negative BRCA (p = 0.027) had significantly shorter overall survival. In conclusion, this study contributes to a better understanding that MYC-amplified breast tumors had distinct clinicopathological and molecular features compared with MYC nonamplified breast tumors. Further research with a larger sample size is necessary to further elucidate the clinical and survival implications of MYC amplifications.Keywords:
Progesterone receptor
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer, especially for HER2-positive or triple negative breast cancer which shows good response to chemotherapy. However, because a result of biomarkers is, occasionally, changed after NAC, the treatment strategy should be differently applied for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. We compared the results of biomarkers before and after NAC to evaluate the association with disease prognosis and oncologic results.Fifty-seven patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent NAC and the immunohistochemical (IHC) staining results were compared between before and after NAC. And the association between oncologic outcomes and biomarkers was analyzed.Negative status of estrogen receptor (ER) was associated with locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis both before and after NAC (p = 0.021, 0.019; p = 0.018, 0.036). And the negative status of progesterone receptor (PR) and triple negative status before neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also associated with death and distant metastasis, respectively. However, the changes of biomarkers after NAC in breast cancer were not directly associated with any oncologic outcomes.The absence of ER in breast cancer before and after NAC would be a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence and distant metastasis. Therefore, the absence of ER should be considered as important factor in determining the treatment strategy.
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Cite
Citations (8)
BACKGROUND: Bcl-2 interacting mediator of cell death (Bim) appears to have contradictory roles in cancer. It is uncertain whether Bim show prognostic significance in patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between Bim expression and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer and to evaluate Bim's effect on overall survival (OS). METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry (IHC) technique to detect the expression of Bim via tissue microarray in 275 breast cancer samples, Kaplan-Meier analysis to perform survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression model to explore the risk factors of breast cancer. RESULTS: The results revealed that Bim expression was significantly correlated with age, estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) and Ki67 expression (P< 0.05). Bim expression was significantly different in the four molecular subtypes (P= 0.000). Survival analysis showed that Bim positive expression contributed to a shorter OS (P= 0.034), especially in patients with luminal A tumors (P= 0.039). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis showed that Bim was an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bim may serve as an effective predictive factor for lower OS in breast cancer patients, especially in those with luminal A tumors.
Cite
Citations (7)
Abstract Background Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, divided into subtypes based on the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Subtypes have different biology and prognosis, with accumulating evidence of different risk factors. The purpose of this study was to compare breast cancer risk factors across tumor subtypes in a large, diverse mammography population. Methods Women aged 40–84 without a history of breast cancer with a screening mammogram at three United States health systems from 2006 to 2015 were included. Risk factor questionnaires were completed at mammogram visit, supplemented by electronic health records. Invasive tumor subtype was defined by immunohistochemistry as ER/PR+HER2−, ER/PR+HER2+, ER, and PR−HER2+, or triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cox proportional hazards models were run for each subtype. Associations of race, reproductive history, prior breast problems, family history, breast density, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed. The association of tumor subtypes with screen detection and interval cancer was assessed using logistic regression among invasive cases. Results The study population included 198,278 women with a median of 6.5 years of follow‐up (IQR 4.2–9.0 years). There were 4002 invasive cancers, including 3077 (77%) ER/PR+HER2−, 300 (8%) TNBC, 342 (9%) ER/PR+HER2+, and 126 (3%) ER/PR−HER2+ subtype. In multivariate models, Black women had 2.7 times higher risk of TNBC than white women (HR = 2.67, 95% CI 1.99–3.58). Breast density was associated with increased risk of all subtypes. BMI was more strongly associated with ER/PR+HER2− and HER2+ subtypes among postmenopausal women than premenopausal women. Breast density was more strongly associated with ER/PR+HER2− and TNBC among premenopausal than postmenopausal women. TNBC was more likely to be interval cancer than other subtypes. Conclusions These results have implications for risk assessment and understanding of the etiology of breast cancer subtypes. More research is needed to determine what factors explain the higher risk of TNBC for Black women.
Cite
Citations (74)
To study the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2 expression in patients with breast cancer.From 59 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 33 without neoadjuvant therapy (control), core biopsy samples before the chemotherapy or surgery and surgical specimens were obtained for assay of ER, PR, and HER-2 expression.Quantitative alteration of ER expression occurred in 37.29% (22/59) of the patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in 15.15% (5/33) of the control patients, showing statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05), but the changes in ER expression status (conversion between positivity/negativity ratio) exhibited no significant difference. After the surgery, quantitative changes in PR expression was noted in 23.73% (14/59) of patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, without significant difference from those in the control group or changes in the expression status. Similarly, the changes in HER-2 expression seen in 13.56% (8/59) of the patients with chemotherapy was also comparable with the control group, without significant changes in the expression status.Significant changes occur in ER receptor expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer, but such changes do not affect the ER status. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has no significant effects on PR and HER-2 expression in breast cancer patients.
Progesterone receptor
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Cite
Citations (3)
Progesterone receptor
Cite
Citations (1)
In de novo metastatic breast cancer patients, the site of metastasis and prognosis are related to the molecular subtype of breast cancer. There are few relevant reports to explore the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of different single positive hormone receptor subtypes [estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)- and ER-/PR+] of metastatic breast cancer.Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015.We analyzed the metastatic patterns and prognosis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative breast cancer patients. Cox analysis was used to analyze the influence of ER+/PR- and ER-/PR+ on the prognosis of patients in different subgroups and the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with single hormone receptor positivity.We included 206,187 breast cancer patients, including 7,726 stage IV patients. The loss of ER was a protective factor against bone metastasis (P<0.001) and a risk factor for visceral metastasis (P<0.001). The ER-/PR+ subtype had a similar proportion of de novo metastatic breast cancer, and similar clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Single PR positivity was an independent risk factor for cancer specific survival (CSS) in multi-visceral metastasis subgroup comparing to TNBC. Meanwhile, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) between ER-/PR+ and ER-/PR- patients in all breast cancer patients or in stage IV breast cancer patients. Age [hazard ratio (HR) =2.16], grade (HR =2.36), T stage (T4: HR =3.24), lymph node metastasis (>10: HR =4.33), distant metastasis (HR =4.99), and no chemotherapy or an unknown (HR =1.65) were high-risk factors but surgery (HR <0.5) were protective factors for CSS in ER-/PR+ patients.ER-/PR+ subtype had a high proportion of stage IV patients. Meanwhile, such subtype breast cancer had similar clinicopathological characteristics, metastatic models (prefers to visceral metastasis), similar even worse prognosis compared with TNBC.
Progesterone receptor
Triple-negative breast cancer
Cite
Citations (7)
There are few models predicting breast cancer prognosis among patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (luminal) breast cancer. We examined whether biological features (BFs) of residual tumors are prognostic factors following NAC.We enrolled patients with remnant tumors following NAC for luminal breast cancer and evaluated clinical stage, pathological stage, BFs prior to NAC, and BFs following NAC as prognostic factors. BFs were divided into high and low risk using the previously reported YR-IHC4 model calculated according to ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2, and the proliferation marker Ki-67.A total of 57 patients were enrolled in the current study. We observed a statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) between the BF risk categories via YR-IHC4 predictions following NAC (p=0.044). The 5-year RFS rates of the BF low- and high-risk groups following NAC were 84.2% and 52.5%, respectively.BFs of residual tumors following NAC may be important prognostic factors in luminal breast cancer.
Progesterone receptor
Cite
Citations (1)
Breast cancer risk is increased with current Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT) use, with higher risks reported for ER+ (Estrogen Receptor positive), and ER+/PR+ (Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor positive) breast cancers than those of ER- and ER-/PR- status, respectively. There is limited evidence to suggest MHT use is associated with the specific subtype characterised as ER+/PR+/HER2- (Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor positive and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor2 negative) status. This study aims to investigate the MHT-breast cancer relationship for breast cancer tumor receptor subtypes defined by ER expression alone, by ER and PR expression only and by joint expression of ER, PR, and HER2. Analyses compared 399 cancer registry-verified breast cancer cases with receptor status information and 324 cancer-free controls. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for current and past versus never MHT use, for subgroups defined by tumor receptor expression. Current, but not past, use of MHT was associated with an elevated risk of ER+ breast cancer (aOR = 2.04, 95%CI: 1.28-3.24) and ER+/PR+ breast cancer (aOR = 2.29, 1.41-3.72). Current MHT use was also associated with an elevated risk of the ER+/PR+/HER2- subtype (aOR = 2.30, 1.42-3.73). None of the other subtypes based on ER, ER/PR or ER/PR/HER2 expression were significantly associated with current MHT use in this analysis. Current, but not past, use of MHT increases the risk of breast cancer, with consistently higher risks reported for ER+ and ER+/PR+ subtypes and mounting evidence regarding the specific ER+/PR+/HER2- subtype. Our findings contribute to quantification of the effects of MHT, and support efforts to articulate the receptor-mediated mechanisms by which MHT increases the risk of breast cancer.
Hormone Therapy
Cite
Citations (17)
Objective: To explore the expression and its clinical significance of hormone receptor and cerbB-2 in breast cancer tissue received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: The estrogen receptor(ER), progesterone recepter(PR) and cerbB-2 in breast cancer tissue of 89 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were detected by immunohistochemical method, and analysed the relation with response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The overall response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer was 89. 9%, of which the complete response was 32. 6%, partial response was 57. 3%, pathological complete response was 17. 9%, disease stable 10. 5%. Hormonal receptor expressions was significantly related to treatment response,the pathological complete response rate was 27. 2% in ER/PR negative tumors,but it was 7.1% in the positive tumors (P0. 05). No correlation was observed between the treatment response and cerbb-2 expression. Conclusions: There has higher sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormonal receptor negative tumors. The hormone receptor of breast cancer in neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be provide important index in decision sensitivity of chemotherapy and clinical evaluation.
Progesterone receptor
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Clinical Significance
Hormonal Therapy
Cite
Citations (0)
This study is to determine the expression of estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) in breast cancer patients and to evaluate its relationship with clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer and its effects on the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Paraffin-embedded primary tumor tissue sections from 490 breast cancer patients were collected consecutively from January 2000 to December 2010. They had complete clinical data and follow-up records. Immunohistochemical staining was conducted to determine ERβ expression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Difference in survival was analyzed by the Log-Rank test. The Cox proportional hazard model was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of ERβ expression in breast cancer patients. The ERβ high and over expression rate in 490 breast patients was 22.4% (110/490). ERβ expression was not associated with clinicopathological parameters of breast cancer. The mean survival time in patients with ERβ negative expression, ERβ low expression, ERβ high expression and ERβ over expression was 9.9 years, 9.2 years, 8.6 years and 5.6 years. Statistically, patients with ERβ high and over expression had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) time compared with the patients with ERβ negative and low expression. The Cox multivariate analysis revealed that ERβ high and over expression, the pathologic stages of tumor and chemotherapy were the independent predictors for poor DFS in breast cancer patients. ERβ expression is an independent prognostic factor of breast cancer patients and its high and over expression indicates poor prognosis of breast cancer. There was no correlation between ERβ expression and clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer.
Progesterone receptor
Cite
Citations (12)