Lnc00892 competes with c-Jun to block NCL transcription, reducing the stability of RhoA/RhoC mRNA and impairing bladder cancer invasion
Shuwei RenNing ZhangLiping ShenYongyong LuYi-Xin ChangZhenni LinNing SunYuanmei ZhangJiheng XuHaishan HuangHonglei Jin
12
Citation
62
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Keywords:
Nucleolin
RhoC
RhoC
RHOB
Cite
Citations (226)
Abstract RhoA and RhoC are highly related Rho GTPases, but differentially control cellular behaviour. We combined molecular, cellular, and biochemical experiments to characterise differences between these highly similar GTPases. Our findings demonstrate that enhanced expression of RhoC results in a striking increase in the migration and invasion of pancreatic carcinoma cells, whereas forced expression of RhoA decreases these actions. These isoform-specific functions correlate with differences in the cellular activity of RhoA and RhoC in human cells, with RhoC being more active than RhoA in activity assays and serum-response factor-dependent gene transcription. Subcellular localisation studies revealed that RhoC is predominantly localised in the membrane-containing fraction, whereas RhoA is mainly localised in the cytoplasmic fraction. These differences are not mediated by a different interaction with RhoGDIs. In vitro GTP/GDP binding analyses demonstrate different affinity of RhoC for GTP[S] and faster intrinsic and guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF)-stimulated GDP/GTP exchange rates compared to RhoA. Moreover, the catalytic domains of SopE and Dbs are efficacious GEFs for RhoC. mRNA expression of RhoC is markedly enhanced in advanced pancreatic cancer stages, and thus the differences discovered between RhoA and RhoC might provide explanations for their different influences on cell migration and tumour invasion.
RhoC
Cite
Citations (32)
To investigate the expression of RhoA, RhoC and their effector ROCK-1 in four ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro and their correlation with invasiveness.Expression of RhoA, RhoC and ROCK-1 mRNA and protein in four ovarian cancer cell lines SW626, Skov-3, A2780 and Caov-3 was detected by RT-PCR and Western blot assay. Invasion assay was done in Boyden chamber.The expression levels of RhoA, RhoC and ROCK-1 mRNA and protein varied in the four different cell lines examined. The expression level of RhoC, but not RhoA and ROCK-1, was significantly correlated with the invasive capability of these cells in vitro (r = 0.95, P < 0.01). Expression of RhoA at the level of transcription was not correlated with that at the translation level. The expression of RhoA and RhoC did not correlate with that of ROCK-1.Expression level of RhoC may serve as an independent parameter in evaluating metastasis and become a new target in inhibiting ovarian cancer metastasis.
RhoC
Cite
Citations (3)
Abstract Although the RhoA and RhoC proteins comprise an important subset of the Rho GTPase family that have been implicated in invasive breast carcinomas, attributing specific functions to these individual members has been difficult. We have used a stable retroviral RNA interference approach to generate invasive breast carcinoma cells (SUM-159 cells) that lack either RhoA or RhoC expression. Analysis of these cells enabled us to deduce that RhoA impedes and RhoC stimulates invasion. Unexpectedly, this analysis also revealed a compensatory relationship between RhoA and RhoC at the level of both their expression and activation, and a reciprocal relationship between RhoA and Rac1 activation.
RhoC
Breast carcinoma
RHOB
Cite
Citations (148)
A number of Rho family members have been shown to control tumor cell proliferation, survival and invasion. Rhophilin, an effector of both RhoA and RhoC, is amplified in glioblastoma and its expression strongly correlates with decreased patient survival. Importantly, rhophilin 2 has recently also been shown to be a critical driver gene of the mesenchymal phenotype in human glioblastoma. However, the cellular functions of RhoA and RhoC in glioblastoma largely remain to be characterized. Here we show that depletion of RhoA, but not RhoC, significantly inhibits glioblastoma cell proliferation. Conversely, depletion of RhoC, but not RhoA, significantly inhibits glioblastoma cell invasion into ex vivo brain slices. In line with this, depletion of RhoC, but not RhoA, also inhibits nuclear squeezing through a 3 mm pore size filter. In addition, we found that depletion of either RhoA or RhoC inhibit glioblastoma cell survival in clonogenic assays. Thus, RhoA and RhoC differentially regulate distinct aspects of the malignant behavior of glioblastoma. We also have identified PDZ-RhoGEF as a critical activator of both RhoA and RhoC in glioblastoma cells, as depletion of this guanine nucleotide exchange factor strongly diminishes serum-stimulated activation of both GTPases. In addition, consistent with the results of depleting either RhoA or RhoC, we showed that depletion of PDZ-RhoGEF, significantly inhibits glioblastoma cell proliferation, invasion and clonogenicity. We also showed that depletion of PDZ-RhoGEF significantly enhances mouse survival in a patient-derived xenograft model.
RhoC
RHOB
Cite
Citations (0)
RhoC
RHOB
Cite
Citations (53)
RhoA and RhoC GTPases share 92% amino acid sequence identity, yet play different roles in regulating cell motility and morphology. To understand these differences, we developed and validated a biosensor of RhoC activation (RhoC FLARE). This was used together with a RhoA biosensor to compare the spatio-temporal dynamics of RhoA and RhoC activity during cell protrusion/retraction and macropinocytosis. Both GTPases were activated similarly at the cell edge, but in regions more distal from the edge RhoC showed higher activation during protrusion. The two isoforms differed markedly in the kinetics of activation. RhoC was activated concomitantly with RhoA at the cell edge, but distally, RhoC activation preceded RhoA activation, occurring before edge protrusion. During macropinocytosis, differences were observed during vesicle closure and in the area surrounding vesicle formation.
RhoC
RHOB
Cite
Citations (51)
RhoA and RhoC GTPases are 92% identical and possess unique cellular functions. Phosphorylation of Ser188 has widely been reported to inhibit RhoA activity. RhoC retains a canonical PKA recognition sequence (KRR) at positions 185–187, but possesses Arg188 in place of Ser188. We report here that transiently expressed RhoC was more membrane associated than RhoA. Further, RhoC‐R188S was a PKA substrate in vitro and exhibited less GTP loading compared to wild‐type RhoC when expressed in cells. RhoC‐R188S was less membrane associated than RhoC regardless of GTP‐binding status (Q63L). Surprisingly, RhoC‐R188A shared a similar membrane fractionation profile as RhoC‐R188S. In accordance, RhoA‐S188R was more membrane associated than either RhoA or RhoA‐S188A regardless of GTP‐binding status (Q63L). Altogether, these data suggest that expansion of the polybasic carboxyl tract through divergent appearance of Arg188 contributes more to increased RhoC membrane stabilization than loss of phospho‐regulation. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by a research grant from the McElroy Trust Foundation
RhoC
Cite
Citations (0)
RhoC
Small GTPase
Cite
Citations (5)
RhoA and RhoC GTPases are 92% identical but demonstrate unique regulation and function. Phosphorylation of Ser188 has widely been reported to inhibit RhoA activity. RhoC possesses Arg188 in place of Ser188 but retains a canonical upstream PKA recognition sequence. We report here that RhoC-R188S was a PKA substrate in vitro and exhibited less GTP loading compared to wild-type RhoC when expressed in cells. Transiently expressed RhoC was found to be significantly more membrane associated than RhoA. Membrane association of RhoC-R188S and RhoC-R188A were similar to each other and wild-type RhoA, suggesting that Arg188 directly promotes RhoC membrane binding. The positive influence of Arg188 on RhoC membrane association was evident in a constitutively active (Q63L) background. In accordance, RhoA-S188R was significantly more membrane associated than either RhoA or RhoA-S188A. Altogether, these data suggest that swapping residue 188 identity effectively flips the membrane binding profile of wild-type RhoA and RhoC through positive arginine contribution rather than negative phosphoserine regulation.
RhoC
Cite
Citations (6)