logo
    Integrated Approaches for COVID-19 Case Finding and Their Impact on Timeliness for Disease Containment — Changning District, Shanghai Municipality, China, January–July, 2020
    1
    Citation
    7
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Citation Trend
    Abstract:
    What is already known on this topic? The demand for containing the virus and protecting the economy is high on the agenda of policymakers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Modelling studies indicated that highly effective contact tracing and case isolation were enough to contain the spread of COVID-19 at the early stages, but this has not been validated in real world contexts. What is added by this report? Integrated case finding approaches, including outpatient monitoring, exposed people quarantining, and contact tracing, effectively contained the spread of COVID-19 in a densely populated district in Shanghai Municipality, China. Active case-finding involving quarantine of exposed persons and contact tracing could reduce the time from symptom onset to COVID-19 diagnosis, thus reducing the risk of local transmission. What are the implications for public health practice? Active case-finding should be prioritized as an effective approach to minimize the risk of local transmission in future pandemics. Integrated COVID-19 case finding approaches applied in Shanghai may inform public health policy in other regions where strict lockdown is not applicable.
    Keywords:
    Contact tracing
    Pandemic
    Isolation
    Containment (computer programming)
    2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
    Abstract We report on the public health response generated by an outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) that occurred during March 2020 at Bach Mai Hospital (BMH) in Hanoi, northern Vietnam's largest hospital complex. On March 18, a total of 3 distinct clusters of COVID-19 cases were identified at BMH. Diagnosis of the initial 3 COVID-19 cases led to contact tracing, symptom screening, and testing of 495 persons and limited quarantine of affected institutes or departments. When 27 staff members in the catering company tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, the entire BMH staff (7,664 persons) was put under quarantine. Contact tracing in the community resulted in an additional 52,239 persons being quarantined. After 3 weeks, the hospital outbreak was contained; no further spread occurred in the hospital. Rapid screening of cases, extensive testing, prompt quarantine, contact tracing, and social distancing contributed to prevent community transmission in Hanoi and northern Vietnam.
    Contact tracing
    Communicable disease
    Social distance
    2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
    Citations (36)
    Australian states and territories used test–trace–isolate–quarantine (TTIQ) systems extensively in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021. We report on an analysis of Australian case data to estimate the impact of test–trace–isolate–quarantine systems on SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Our analysis uses a novel mathematical modelling framework and detailed surveillance data on COVID-19 cases including dates of infection and dates of isolation. First, we directly translate an empirical distribution of times from infection to isolation into reductions in potential for onward transmission during periods of relatively low caseloads (tens to hundreds of reported cases per day). We then apply a simulation approach, validated against case data, to assess the impact of case-initiated contact tracing on transmission during a period of relatively higher caseloads and system stress (up to thousands of cases per day). We estimate that under relatively low caseloads in the state of New South Wales (tens of cases per day), TTIQ contributed to a 54% reduction in transmission. Under higher caseloads in the state of Victoria (hundreds of cases per day), TTIQ contributed to a 42% reduction in transmission. Our results also suggest that case-initiated contact tracing can support timely quarantine in times of system stress (thousands of cases per day). Contact tracing systems for COVID-19 in Australia were highly effective and adaptable in supporting the national suppression strategy from 2020–21, prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant in November 2021. TTIQ systems were critical to the maintenance of the strong suppression strategy and were more effective when caseloads were (relatively) low.
    Contact tracing
    Pandemic
    Isolation
    Tracing
    TRACE (psycholinguistics)
    Abstract We sought to assess the proportion of elicited close contacts diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 at the start of and before exiting quarantine in San Francisco. From June 8 to August 31, 6946 contacts were identified: 3008 (46.3%) were tested, 940 (13.5%) tested positive, and 90% tested positive in the first 9 days of quarantine.
    Contact tracing
    2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
    Coronavirus
    Pandemic
    Citations (7)
    To separate and isolate the ill have been important goals in medicine, in cultural practices, and in the resulting architectural forms when faced with the urgent problem of infection in society. In history, the isolation settings that have been designed and built were almost universally well distanced from the daily life of the community. The lazaretto, the pesthouse, the monastery infirmary, and the fever hospital are early examples of architects answering the call of science (of the time) and society to provide that all-important separation and isolation. Buildings that were specifically designed to isolate and treat difficult diseases include the Paimio Hospital by Alvaar Alto in 1932 and the Saranac Cure Cottages, such as the 1915 Trudeau Sanatorium that addressed tuberculosis, the massive general hospitals of Europe in the late 19th and early 20th century, and the so-called plague hospitals in North America that resulted from an imperfect understanding of the worldwide influenza pandemic of 1918. As knowledge grew, and especially as the germ theory of disease displaced the miasma theory of disease, designers collaborated with the medical world to create life-sustaining health care environments that call on different approaches to prevent the spread of infectious disease.
    Isolation
    Citations (0)
    Summary Previous work has indicated that contact tracing and isolation of index case and quarantine of potential secondary cases can, in concert with physical distancing measures, be an effective strategy for reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (1). Currently, contacts traced manually through the NHS Test and Trace scheme in the UK are asked to self-isolate for 14 days from the day they were exposed to the index case, which represents the upper bound for the incubation period (2). However, following previous work on screening strategies for air travellers (3,4) it may be possible that this quarantine period could be reduced if combined with PCR testing. Adapting the simulation model for contact tracing, we find that quarantine periods of at least 10 days combined with a PCR test on day 9 may largely emulate the results from a 14-day quarantine period in terms of the averted transmission potential from secondary cases (72% (95%UI: 3%, 100%) vs 75% (4%, 100%), respectively). These results assume the delays from testing index cases’ and tracing their contacts are minimised (no longer than 4.5 days on average). If secondary cases are traced and quarantined 1 day earlier on average, shorter quarantine periods of 8 days with a test on day 7 (76% (7%, 100%)) approach parity with the 14 day quarantine period with a 1 day longer delay to the index cases’ test. However, the risk of false-negative PCR tests early in a traced case’s infectious period likely prevents the use of testing to reduce quarantine periods further than this, and testing immediately upon tracing, with release if negative, will avert just 17% of transmission potential on average. In conclusion, the use of PCR testing is an effective strategy for reducing quarantine periods for secondary cases, while still reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, especially if delays in the test and trace system can be reduced, and may improve quarantine compliance rates.
    Contact tracing
    Index case
    Pcr test
    Isolation
    Incubation period
    Citations (27)
    To limit SARS-CoV-2 spread, quarantine and isolation are obligatory in several situations in Norway. We found low self-reported adherence to requested measures among 1,704 individuals (42%; 95% confidence interval: 37–48). Adherence was lower in May–June–July (33–38%) compared with April (66%), and higher among those experiencing COVID-19-compatible symptoms (71%) compared with those without (28%). These findings suggest that consideration is required of strategies to improve people’s adherence to quarantine and isolation.
    Isolation
    2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
    Social Isolation
    Pandemic
    Patient isolation
    The pandemic of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a severe threat to public health. The policy of close contract tracing quarantine is an effective strategy in controlling the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak. In this paper, we developed a mathematical model of the COVID-19 epidemic with confirmed case-driven contact tracing quarantine, and applied the model to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy of contact tracing and quarantine. The model is established based on the combination of the compartmental model and individual-based model simulations, which results in a closed-form delay differential equation model. The proposed model includes a novel form of quarantine functions to represent the number of quarantine individuals following the confirmed cases every day and provides analytic expressions to study the effects of changing the quarantine rate. The proposed model can be applied to epidemic dynamics during the period of community spread and when the policy of confirmed cases-driven contact tracing quarantine is efficient. We applied the model to study the effectiveness of contact tracing and quarantine. The proposed delay differential equation model can describe the average epidemic dynamics of the stochastic-individual-based model, however, it is not enough to describe the diverse response due to the stochastic effect. Based on model simulations, we found that the policy of contact tracing and quarantine can obviously reduce the epidemic size, however, may not be enough to achieve zero-infectious in a short time, a combination of close contact quarantine and social contact restriction is required to achieve zero-infectious. Moreover, the effect of reducing epidemic size is insensitive to the period of quarantine, there are no significant changes in the epidemic dynamics when the quarantine days vary from 7 to 21 days.
    Contact tracing
    Tracing
    Epidemic model
    Pandemic
    Citations (8)
    Information on the effectiveness of COVID-19 contact tracing is lacking. We proposed 2 measures for evaluating the effectiveness of contact tracing and applied them in a public health unit in northern Portugal.This retrospective cohort study included the contacts of people with COVID-19 diagnosed July 1-September 15, 2020. We examined 2 measures: (1) number needed to quarantine (NNQ), as the number of quarantine person-days needed to prevent 1 potential infectious person-day; and (2) proportion of prevented infectious days by quarantine (PPID), as the number of potential infectious days prevented by quarantine divided by all infectious days. We assessed these measures by sociodemographic characteristics, types of contacts, and intervention timings (ie, time between diagnosis or symptom onset and intervention). We considered 3 scenarios for infectiousness periods: 10 days before to 10 days after symptom onset, 3 days before to 3 days after symptom onset, and 2 days before to 10 days after symptom onset.We found an NNQ of 19.8-41.8 person-days and a PPID of 19.7%-38.2%, depending on the infectiousness period scenario. Effectiveness was higher among cohabitants and symptomatic contacts than among social or asymptomatic contacts. NNQ and PPID changed by intervention timings: the effectiveness of contact tracing decreased with time from diagnosis to quarantine of contacts and with time from symptom onset of the index case to contacts' quarantine.These proposed measures of contact tracing effectiveness of communicable diseases can be important for decision making and prioritizing contact tracing when resources are scarce. They are also useful measures for communication with the general population, policy makers, and clinicians because they are easy to understand and use to assess the impact of health interventions.
    Contact tracing
    Citations (1)
    Models of contact tracing often over-simplify the effects of quarantine and isolation on disease transmission. We develop a model that allows us to investigate the importance of these factors in reducing the effective reproduction number. We show that the reduction in onward transmission during quarantine and isolation has a bigger effect than tracing coverage on the reproduction number. We also show that intuitively reasonable contact tracing performance indicators, such as the proportion of contacts quarantined before symptom onset, are often not well correlated with the reproduction number. We conclude that provision of support systems to enable people to quarantine and isolate effectively is crucial to the success of contact tracing.
    Contact tracing
    Isolation
    Tracing
    2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
    Basic reproduction number
    Pandemic