logo
    Education for Sustainable Development Country Status Reports: An evaluation of national implementation during the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development in East and Southeast Asia
    0
    Citation
    0
    Reference
    20
    Related Paper
    Drawing from research evaluation of the Fisheries Program of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Centre (ACIAR) in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Island Countries, this paper explores the link between Research for Development (R4D) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Specifically, it seeks to understand how Research Capacity Development (RCD) in fisheries, in the specific contexts of international development partnerships, may contribute to SDG 1 (no poverty), 2 (zero hunger), and 3 (good health and wellbeing). A high-level multi-path, RCD-to-impact approach is employed to assess the outcomes of the R4D program of the ACIAR Fisheries Program at the individual, organisational and systems levels. Both primary and secondary data were collected through document analysis, interviews, surveys, and case studies. The case studies illustrate that RCD in fisheries in partner countries can contributes to the SDGs in participating communities. The paper advances research on the link between R4D and the SDGs and proposes a high-level framework to assist researchers and international development practitioners in assessing the impacts of investing in RCD.
    Asia-Pacific
    Fisheries Research
    The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have become applicable since January 2016 and is expected to be fully implemented in 2030.This article examines how Indonesia, Malaysia, and Negara Brunei Darussalam (NBD) as three Muslim countries in Southeast Asia with different economic, social, and political conditions commit to respond to the SDGs.The study used content analysis method to analyze the long and medium-term development plan documents in three stages.The researchers interviewed the planners to get an overview of the process of achieving the SDGs.The results of this study showed that the three countries have their own specific institutional agencies that undertook similar steps in achieving the goals, i.e. aligning the existing plan documents with SDGs, examining the indicator and data availability for monitoring and evaluation, establishing communication, and building the capacity with all stakeholders.The three countries have already internalized the SDGs in their planning development.However, when it comes to SDGS targets and indicators, Malaysia and NBD have a lower score than Indonesia because as a country with a lower level of development, Indonesia has more desired outcomes with quantitatively explicit and specific indicators.
    Citations (7)