The effect of technique on loading at the knee during common sporting manoeuvres
0
Citation
0
Reference
20
Related Paper
Cite
ACL injury
Internal Rotation
Cite
Citations (0)
Cite
Citations (0)
Chronic athletic groin pain (AGP) is common in field sports and has been associated with abnormal movement control and loading of the hip and pelvis during play. A single-leg squat (SLS) is commonly used by clinicians to assess movement control, but whether it can provide insight into control during more dynamic sporting movements in AGP patients is unclear.To determine the relationships between biomechanical measures in an SLS and the same measures in a single-leg drop landing, single-leg hurdle hop, and a cutting maneuver in AGP patients.Cross-sectional study.Biomechanics laboratory.40 recreational field-sports players diagnosed with AGP.A biomechanical analysis of each individual's SLS, drop landing, hurdle hop, and cut was undertaken.Hip, knee, and pelvis angular displacement and hip and knee peak moments. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to examine relationships between SLS measures and equivalent measures in the other movements.There were no significant correlations between any hip or pelvis measure in the SLS with the same measures in the drop landing, hurdle hop, or cut (r = .03-.43, P > .05). Knee frontal- and transverse-plane angular displacement were related in the SLS and drop landing only, while knee moments were related in the SLS, drop-landing, and hurdle hop (r = .50-.67, P < .05).For AGP patients, an SLS did not provide meaningful insight into hip and pelvis control or loading during sporting movements that are associated with injury development. The usefulness of an SLS test in the assessment of movement control and loading in AGP patients is thus limited. The SLS provided moderate insight into knee control while landing and therefore may be of use in the examination of knee-injury risk.
Squat
Groin
Biomechanics
Cite
Citations (6)
Background: Prophylactic taping is commonly used to prevent ankle injuries during sports. However unnatural constraint of the ankle joint may increase the risk of injury to proximal joints such as the knee. Any association between the use of ankle tape and knee joint loading has not previously been investigated. Purpose: To determine changes in ankle and knee kinetics and kinematics associated with use of ankle taping during athletic activities. Thereby, both the prophylactic benefits and the potential of taping to be an isolated mechanism for a ligamentous injury of the knee will be examined. Methods: A kinematic and inverse dynamics model was used to determine ankle and knee joint motion and loading in 22 healthy male participants undertaking running and sidestepping tasks. Both tasks were randomized to planned and unplanned conditions, and undertaken with and without the use of ankle tape. Results: Taping reduced the range of motion at the ankle in all three planes (p Conclusion: By limiting motion at the ankle, taping increased the mechanical stability of this joint. Ankle taping also provided protective benefits to the knee via reduced internal rotation moments and varus impulses, although the effects were task-specific. Medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligament injuries may, however, occur through increased valgus impulse during sidestepping undertaken with ankle tape.
Biomechanics
Cite
Citations (0)
Biomechanics
Cite
Citations (45)
Tensile forces on the ACL increase when the knee is in an extended posture and required to accommodate applied moments in flexion, varus, valgus and/or internal rotation. However, the loading of knee joint support structures during sporting actions that are related to non-contact injuries are largely unknown. We studied external loading of the knee during running, side-stepping and cross-over cutting in 10 male subjects under both pre-planned and unanticipated conditions. Soft tissue structures of the knee were exposed to high FE, VV and IE applied moments during the cutting tasks, especially when performed in the unanticipated condition. Whilst muscle activation could accommodate some of this applied load, soft tissue structures were particularly vulnerable during the cross-over cut task where the residual loads were high.
Knee flexion
Cite
Citations (2)
Proprioception
Cite
Citations (34)
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries commonly occur during landing maneuvers. Prophylactic knee braces were introduced to reduce the risk of ACL injuries, but their effectiveness is debated. Hypotheses: We hypothesized that bracing would improve biomechanical factors previously related to the risk of ACL injuries, such as increased hip and knee flexion angles at initial contact and at peak vertical ground-reaction force (GRF), increased ankle plantar flexion angles at initial contact, decreased peak GRFs, and decreased peak knee extension moment. We also hypothesized that bracing would increase the negative power and work of the hip joint and would decrease the negative power and work of the knee and ankle joints. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Three-dimensional motion and force plate data were collected from 8 female and 7 male recreational athletes performing double-leg drop landings from 0.30 m and 0.60 m with and without a prophylactic knee brace. GRFs, joint angles, moments, power, and work were calculated for each athlete with and without a knee brace. Results: Prophylactic knee bracing increased the hip flexion angle at peak GRF by 5.56° ( P < .001), knee flexion angle at peak GRF by 4.75° ( P = .001), and peak hip extension moment by 0.44 N·m/kg ( P < .001). Bracing also increased the peak hip negative power by 4.89 W/kg ( P = .002) and hip negative work by 0.14 J/kg ( P = .001) but did not result in significant differences in the energetics of the knee and ankle. No differences in peak GRFs and peak knee extension moment were observed with bracing. Conclusion: The application of a prophylactic knee brace resulted in improvements in important biomechanical factors associated with the risk of ACL injuries. Clinical Relevance: Prophylactic knee braces may help reduce the risk of noncontact knee injuries in recreational and professional athletes while playing sports. Further studies should investigate different types of prophylactic knee braces in conjunction with existing training interventions so that the sports medicine community can better assess the effectiveness of prophylactic knee bracing.
Bracing
Ground reaction force
Biomechanics
Cite
Citations (21)
Cite
Citations (0)
The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries may be decreased through the use of intervention programs that focus on increasing the knee flexion angle during jump landing, which decreases strain on the ACL.To investigate whether intervention training designed to change the knee flexion angle during landing causes secondary changes in other known measures associated with the risk of ACL injuries and to examine the time points when these secondary measures change.Controlled laboratory study.A total of 39 healthy recreational athletes performed a volleyball block jump task in an instrumented gait laboratory. The participants first completed the jumps without any modification to their normal landing technique. They were then given oral instruction to land softly and to increase their knee flexion angle during landing. Lower body kinematics and kinetics were measured before and after the modification using an optoelectronic motion capture system.The knee flexion angle after the modification significantly increased from 11.2° to 15.2° at initial contact and from 67.8° to 100.7° at maximum flexion, and the time between initial contact and maximum flexion increased from 177.4 to 399.4 milliseconds. The flexion modification produced a substantial reduction in vertical ground-reaction force (243.1 to 187.8 %BW) with a concomitant reduction in the maximum flexion moment. Interestingly, the flexion modification only affected the abduction angle and abduction moment for the group of participants that landed in an initial adducted position before the modification and had no significant effect on the group that landed in an abducted position.Increasing the knee flexion angle during jump landing may be an effective intervention to improve knee biomechanical risk factors associated with an ACL injury. However, the fact that the flexion modification only influenced critical risk factors (the abduction angle and abduction moment) in participants who initially landed in an adducted position suggests that the selection of interventions to prevent ACL injuries should account for patient-specific characteristics.The study helps elucidate how increasing the knee flexion angle affects lower body biomechanics and provided evidence for the need to introduce patient-specific strategies for preventing ACL injuries.
Knee flexion
ACL injury
Ground reaction force
Cite
Citations (34)